Biology help!
1 SHM student slides pt 1(1).pdf
Welcome to Biology 105
Overview
What is science and why is it important?
How does science work?
Why should people believe science?
What’s the difference between science and pseudoscience?
What is science and why is it important? "Science is nothing but trained and organized
common sense." TH Huxley
"Science is a way of thinking much more than it is a body of knowledge."
Carl Sagan
Saturn’s moon Titan
“Science is the concerted human effort to understand… the history of the natural world and how [it]….works, with observable physical evidence as the basis of that understanding.”
Bruce Railsback
"Science is... one of the great human endeavors to be ranked with arts and religion as the guide and expression of man's fearless quest for truth."
Sir Richard Arman Gregory
Everyone needs basic knowledge of science
people who don’t understand science often reject it in favor of ancient practices, their feelings, or pseudoscience
People sometimes refuse science-based medicine without understanding how it differs from non-scientific or traditional medical practices
potentially life--threatening misunderstandings
Homeopathy: there is no medicine in homeopathic medications
Vaccine refusal: vaccinations have prevented many thousands of child deaths from disease, and are not associated with autism or other conditions
rates of vaccine-preventable disease are increasing in parts of the US, with possibly fatal results
Diphtheria, Tetanus, and Pertussis vs. DTap Vaccine
DISEASE
Diphtheria Death: 1 in 20
Tetanus Death: 2 in 10
Pertussis Pneumonia: 1 in 8 Encephalitis: 1 in 20 Death: 1 in 1,500
VACCINES DTaP Continuous crying, then full recovery: 1 in 1000
Convulsions or shock, then full recovery: 1 in 14,000
Acute encephalopathy: 0- 10.5 in 1,000,000
Death: None proven
Acupuncture: scientific studies show ‘sham acupuncture’ is generally as effective as actual acupuncture
Rejection of facts: People ignore or suppress science-based estimates of sea level rise because they don’t like the uncomfortable scientific facts and conclude that therefore they must be incorrect
Human civilization right now faces some of the greatest challenges to our survival that we have ever faced
non-scientists need to understand basic science, and can help by seeing that scientific solutions are accepted and implemented
Characteristics of science
Science is both a body of knowledge and the process by which that knowledge is acquired
http://www.theguardian.com/global
-development/2013/jan/21/african-
scientists-engineers-rise-shine
Science is evidence-based
It can’t be changed because of people’s feelings, preferences, beliefs, intuition, etc.
Science does not try to support pre- determined positions, but is open to all evidence
The methods, tests, and reasoning used by scientists should be completely open, explicit, and transparent
Science is the foundation of civilization and an important part of what separates humans from animals
Science defines and investigates the critical challenges to human existence and their solutions
Science expands our horizons in many ways
Science provides great, beautiful, inspiring, and thought-provoking experiences
The dwarf planet Pluto taken earlier this summer
Science helps people understand our place in the universe and what else the universe has to offer
Science is an ongoing global human endeavor with important contributions from all time periods and all societies
A brief history of science
Ancient people studied questions in biology,
medicine, astronomy, physics
they did not separate science from other belief systems
explanations of natural phenomena included elements of mythology, theology, philosophy
Classical Greeks like Aristotle began to develop science as a way of understanding nature
they made observations and did experiments, especially "thought experiments“ to answer questions about how the world worked
The Antikythira Calculator
they wrote textbooks on medicine, physics, and agriculture
in the 4th to 15th centuries, science stagnated in Europe
people still relied on the ancients for their understanding of nature
authority figures like Aristotle, Galen, and Dioscorides were studied
people did not make observations or do experiments; little growth in scientific knowledge
in the 8th to 13th centuries Arab scientists made enormous progress in medicine, astronomy, chemistry, and math, which was eventually shared with Europeans
Not until the Renaissance did Europeans realize that they could contribute to science, rather than repeat ancient ideas
demonstration of blood flow by Dr. William Harvey, 1628
Galileo is considered the "first scientist" because he developed the scientific method
new methodology and improvements in science technology and communication resulted in the scientific revolution
NASA Galileo video
The scientific revolution changed how people thought
They began to take a more rationalistic, mechanistic view of how life and the universe worked – things happen for understandable reasons
it improved lives through medical advances, progress in agriculture and food distribution, and the creation of new products
plow printing press
The scientific method seems obvious now, but Europeans prior to Galileo did not use it
Copernicus, famous for his hypothesis that the Earth moves around the sun, did not test his hypothesis with observations, although he could have easily done so
his ideas made sense and seemed correct
simplified calculations needed to predict the positions of the planets
The Royal Society of England (1660)
first scientific organization
members published research, exchanged ideas, formed the first community of scientists
rate of scientific progress increased when scientists could criticize and build upon each other's work light
members were doctors, bankers or businessmen who were curious about nature and enjoyed doing science in their spare time
Today, science is usually done by professionals paid by state or federal funds, or by corporations, to do research
applied research is done to achieve a specific goal, like a better way to control pests or treat diseases
basic research answers questions about the natural world which interest the scientist
Checks built into the system of science funding and publication ensure quality work
scientists compete for funding, and must convince other scientists that their question is important and their methods are good
scientists must publish their work
Publications are peer-reviewed: before publishing an experiment, the experimental design and results are checked by other scientists
this prevents shoddy or unprofessional work from being published
KEY POINT
European interest/ability in science has changed throughout history.
How does science work?
Assumptions
things we believe, but cannot really prove
help us understand the world
Natural Causality: things happening on earth have a natural cause, and can be understood scientifically and fit into known natural laws
anything with a supernatural explanation is not a part of science
Uniformity in Space and Time: natural laws and processes we observe here and now are not different than those in other times or places
biology is based on chemistry and physics
principles of those sciences cannot be violated in biological systems
Assumptions change over time; medieval Europeans would not have the same assumptions that we do
Scientific Method
a general set of activities which can be applied to many types of questions
Steps in the Scientific Method
ask a question or make an observation
do background research in peer-reviewed journals to see what others have discovered
develop one or more hypotheses, possible answers to the question or explanations for the observation
make a prediction based on your hypothesis
this takes the form of an if/then statement: if a certain condition is provided, then you can expect a certain result
test the prediction, often by designing an experiment
use the data generated by your experiment to draw a conclusion: was your hypothesis falsified or supported by your experiment?
if your hypothesis was falsified, revise it and repeat the procedure
Example: Why aren’t
small plants growing
under these pine trees?
Not every idea qualifies as a scientific hypothesis
hypotheses MUST be testable and falsifiable
no hypothesis involving magic or supernatural forces will be accepted by a scientist
Nothing that is true by definition or as a matter of faith qualifies as a scientific hypothesis
SHM Review Questions (1).docx
Science History and Methods Review Questions Use these to review before exams. For extra credit, turn in handwritten answers to the questions, at least one paragraph per question written in proper English spelling and grammar. You can get up to 5 extra credit points total per exam, one for each correct answer. You may turn in as many questions as you want, however. The questions you turn in can be mixed and matched from any of the units covered on each exam. Please indicate clearly which topic and question number each answer refers to. You do not have to copy the question in your answer.
1. How does Dr. Harvey’s demonstration of blood flow illustrate the change in Europeans’ understanding of and relationship to science?
3. Explain the difference between an experiment and a correlation, and why an experiment is better evidence in support of a claim. What type of conclusions can one correctly make from a correlation, and what type can one not?
4. Explain what a double-blind test is and why they are the best way to show whether or not a new medication is effective against a human disease.
5a. Look up the definition of a toxin (you can copy directly from the source for this question). b. How do you think a toxin might get into your body? c. How does your body get rid of toxins (look it up and paraphrase the answer.) d. Can you think of any way that consuming something, fasting, or applying something to your body (oil, for example) could remove toxins?