Here it is
Critical Analysis & Discussions Rubric
|
On-Time Posting |
On Time |
Late 1 Day |
Late 2 Days |
Late 3 Days |
No Posting |
|
Critical Analysis #1 |
10 points Posted first critical analysis of another student's Case Study before 11:59PM Eastern Time Thursday. |
7 points Posted first critical analysis of another student's Case Study before 11:59PM Eastern Time Friday. |
4 points Posted first critical analysis of another student's Case Study before 11:59PM Eastern Time Saturday. |
2 points Posted first critical analysis of another student's Case Study before 11:59PM Eastern Time Sunday. |
0 points Did not post first critical analysis of another student's Case Study before 11:59PM Eastern Time Sunday. |
|
Critical Analysis #2 |
10 points Posted Critical Analysis of a second student's Case Study before 11:59PM Eastern Time Thursday. |
7 points Posted Critical Analysis of a second student's Case Study before 11:59PM Eastern Time Friday. |
4 points Posted Critical Analysis of a second student's Case Study before 11:59PM Eastern Time Saturday. |
2 points Posted a critical analysis of a second student's Case Study before 11:59PM Eastern Time Sunday. |
0 points Did not post a Critical Analysis of a second student's Case Study before 11:59PM Eastern Time Sunday. |
|
Quality of Critical Analyses |
Excellent |
Good |
Acceptable |
Needs Significant Improvement |
No Posting |
|
Quality of Critical Analysis #1 |
20 points Posted a clear, concise, and thorough critical analysis of another student's Case Study (3 or more points of analysis). |
17 points Posted a complete and coherent critical analysis of another student's Case Study (2 or more points of analysis). |
14 points Posted a critical analysis of another student's Case Study. Addresses at least one of the major points of discussion. |
4 points Posted a minimal response to another student's Case Study. The response did not provide a critical analysis of the Case Study. |
0 points Did not post a critical analysis of another student's Case Study. |
|
Quality of Critical Analysis #2 |
20 points Posted a clear, concise, and thorough critical analysis of a second student's Case Study (3 or more points of analysis). |
17 points Posted a mostly complete and coherent response to the initial discussion topic. Addresses the major points of discussion, but misses minor points. |
14 points Posted a critical analysis of a second student's Case Study. Addresses at least one of the major points of discussion. |
4 points Posted a minimal response to a second student's Case Study. The response did not provide a critical analysis of the Case Study. |
0 points Did not post a critical analysis of a second student's Case Study. |
|
References for Critical Analyses |
Excellent |
Acceptable |
Needs Significant Improvement |
No References |
|
|
References in Critical Analysis #1 |
5 points Includes 3 or more scholarly / authoritative sources of information in the response and correctly cites each reference using in-text citations and a reference list. |
3 points Includes 2 or more scholarly / authoritative sources of information but sources were improperly cited. Citations and/or references provide sufficient information to locate and retrieve the resource. |
2 points Sources were mentioned but the citations and/or references did not provide sufficient information to locate or retrieve the resource. OR, the sources used were not authoritative. |
0 points Does not include in-text citations and references. |
|
|
References in Critical Analysis #2 |
5 points Includes 3 or more scholarly / authoritative sources of information in the response and correctly cites each reference using in-text citations and a reference list. |
3 points Includes 2 or more scholarly / authoritative sources of information but sources were improperly cited. Citations and/or references provide sufficient information to locate and retrieve the resource. |
2 points Sources were mentioned but the citations and/or references did not provide sufficient information to locate or retrieve the resource. OR, the sources used were not authoritative. |
0 points Does not include in-text citations and references. |
|
|
Timing of Comments in Critical Analysis Threads |
On Time |
Late Comments |
No Response |
|
|
|
Comments in First Critical Analysis Thread |
5 points Completed posting comments to another student's critical analysis before 11:59PM Eastern Time Sunday. |
0 points Completed posting comments to another student's critical analysis after 11:59PM Eastern Time Sunday. |
0 points Does not post comments in a critical analysis thread. |
|
|
|
Comments in Second Critical Analysis Thread |
5 points Completed posting comments to a second student's critical analysis before 11:59PM Eastern Time Sunday. |
0 points Completed posting comments to another student's critical analysis after 11:59PM Eastern Time Sunday. |
0 points Does not post comments in a second critical analysis thread. |
|
|
|
Quality of Comments to Critical Analyses |
Excellent |
Acceptable |
Minimal |
No Response |
|
|
Comments in First Critical Analysis Thread |
10 points Posted a complete and coherent response to a fellow student's critical analysis. Fully addresses the student's work and adds value to the discussion. |
7.5 points Posted a coherent response to a fellow student's critical analysis. Addresses the student's points and adds some value to the discussion. |
5 points Responds to a fellow student, but adds little or no value to the discussion |
0 points Does not respond to another student. |
|
|
Comments in Second Critical Analysis Thread |
10 points Posted a complete and coherent response to a fellow student's critical analysis in a second thread (different from the first). Fully addresses the student's work and adds value to the discussion. |
7.5 points Posted a coherent response to a fellow student's critical analysis (in a second critical analysis thread). Addresses the student's points and adds some value to the discussion. |
5 points Responds to a fellow student, but adds little or no value to the discussion. |
0 points Does not respond to another student. |
|