Your response should be four (4) double-spaced pages; refer to the "Assignment Format" page located on the Course Home page for specific format requirements.

Grading Rubric

Please refer to the rubric on the following page for the grading criteria for this assignment.

CATEGORYExemplarySatisfactoryUnsatisfactoryUnacceptable

10 points 8 points 5 points 2 points

Student provides a clear,

logical description of the

overview of the project.

Student provides a mostly

clear, logical description of

the overview of the project.

Student provides a weak or

unclear description of the

overview of the project.

Student provides a poor

description of the

overview of the project.

10 points 8 points 5 points 2 points

Student provides a clear,

logical description of the

objectives of the project.

Student provides a mostly

clear, logical description of

the objectives of the

project.

Student provides a weak or

unclear description of the

objectives of the project.

Student provides a poor

description of the

objectives of the project.

5 points4 points3 points2 points

Student provides a clear,

logical description of the

general approach.

Student provides a mostly

clear, logical description of

the general approach.

Student provides a weak or

unclear description of the

general approach.

Student provides a poor

description of the general

approach.

5 points4 points3 points2 points

Student provides a clear,

logical description of the

contractual aspects of the

project.

Student provides a mostly

clear, logical description of

the contractual aspects of

the project.

Student provides a weak or

unclear description of the

contractual aspects of the

project.

Student provides a poor

description of the

contractual aspects of the

project.

10 points 8 points 5 points 2 points

Student provides a clear,

logical description of the

project schedule.

Student provides a mostly

clear, logical description of

the project schedule.

Student provides a weak or

unclear description of the

project schedule.

Student provides a poor

description of the project

schedule.

10 points 8 points 5 points 2 points

Student provides a clear

logical description of the

resource requirements for

the project.

Student provides a mostly

clear logical description of

the resource requirements

for the project.

Student provides a weak or

unclear description of the

resource requirements for

the project.

Student provides a poor

description of the resource

requirements for the

project.

5 points4 points3 points2 points

Student provides a clear,

logical description of the

personnel needed for the

project.

Student provides a mostly

clear, logical description of

the personnel needed for

the project.

Student provides a weak or

unclear description of the

personnel needed for the

project.

Student provides a poor

description of the

personnel needed for the

project.

10 points 8 points 5 points 2 points

Student provides a clear,

logical description of the

evaluation methods.

Student provides a mostly

clear, logical description of

the evaluation methods.

Student provides a weak or

unclear description of the

evaluation methods.

Student provides a poor

description of the

evaluation methods.

10 points 8 points 5 points 2 points

Student provides a clear,

logical description of the

potential problems.

Student provides a mostly

clear, logical description of

the potential problems.

Student provides a weak or

unclear description of the

potential problems.

Student provides a poor

description of the

potential problems.

10 points 8 points 5 points 2 points

Student makes no errors in

grammar or spelling that

distract the reader from the

content.

Student makes 1-2 errors in

grammar or spelling that

distract the reader from the

content.

Student makes 3-4 errors in

grammar or spelling that

distract the reader from the

content.

Student makes more than

4 errors in grammar or

spelling that distract the

reader from the content.

15 points 12 points 8 points 5 points

The paper is written in

proper format. All sources

used for quotes and facts are

credible and cited correctly.

Excellent organization,

including a variety of

thoughtful transitions.

The paper is written in

proper format with only 1-2

errors. All sources used for

quotes and facts are credible

and most are cited correctly.

Adequate organization

includes a variety of

appropriate transitions.

The paper is written in

proper format with only 3-5

errors. Most sources used

for quotes and facts are

credible and cited correctly.

Essay is poorly organized,

but may include a few

effective transitions.

The paper is not written in

proper format. Many

sources used for quotes

and facts are less than

credible (suspect) and/or

are not cited correctly.

Essay is disorganized and

does not include effective

transitions.

Format - APA Format,

Citations,

Organization,

Transitions

(15 Points)

Potential problems

(10 Points)

Overview (10 Points)

Objectives (10 Points)

General approach

(5 Points)

Contractual aspects

(5 Points)

Mechanics -Grammar,

Punctuation, Spelling

(10 Points)

Schedule (10 Points)

Personnel (5 Points)

Evaluation methods

(10 Points)

Resource

requirements

(10 Points)