FOR PROF XAVIER

Running head: RANDOM ARTICLES REVIEW 1

RANDOM ARTICLES REVIEW 2

Random Articles Review

Chris Sample

Liberty University

Note:

No abstract is required for this assignment.

Random Articles Review

Title of your paper.

Cook, J. E., Purdie-Vaughns, V., Garcia, J., & Cohen, G. L. (2012). Chronic threat and contingent belonging: Protective benefits of values affirmation on identity development. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(3), 479-496. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0026312

Annotations should be in alphabetical order based on the first author’s last name.

Summary: The summary should be written in your own words (no direct quotes). It should describe the main idea presented in the article. Typically this would include a description of what research question was explored, and what conclusion(s) were reached.

Strengths or Weaknesses: Based on your evaluation, or on information provided in the text of your article, comment on the reliability of the results reported in this article.

Evaluation: What is your evaluation of this article? For full credit, your evaluation must go beyond a simple statement of “like” or “dislike.” Tell whether or not you found the article helpful, and explain why. Remember that your annotation should contain at least 100, but not more than 200 words.

Use sub-headings to organize the information in your annotation.

Hardy, S. A., Walker, L. J., Rackham, D. D., & Olsen, J. A. (2012). Religiosity and adolescent empathy and aggression: The mediating role of moral identity. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 4(3), 237-248. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0027566

Summary: The summary should be written in your own words (no direct quotes). It should describe the main idea presented in the article. Typically this would include a description of what research question was explored, and what conclusion(s) were reached.

Strengths or Weaknesses: Based on your evaluation, or on information provided in the text of your article, comment on the reliability of the results reported in this article.

Evaluation: What is your evaluation of this article? For full credit, your evaluation must go beyond a simple statement of “like” or “dislike.” Tell whether or not you found the article helpful, and explain why. Remember that your annotation should contain at least 100, but not more than 200 words.

Luyckx, K., Teppers, E., Klimstra, T. A., & Rassart, J. (2014). Identity processes and personality traits and types in adolescence: Directionality of effects and developmental trajectories. Developmental Psychology, 50(8), 2144-2153. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0037256

Summary: The summary should be written in your own words (no direct quotes). It should describe the main idea presented in the article. Typically this would include a description of what research question was explored, and what conclusion(s) were reached.

Strengths or Weaknesses: Based on your evaluation, or on information provided in the text of your article, comment on the reliability of the results reported in this article.

Evaluation: What is your evaluation of this article? For full credit, your evaluation must go beyond a simple statement of “like” or “dislike.” Tell whether or not you found the article helpful, and explain why. Remember that your annotation should contain at least 100, but not more than 200 words.

Magaldi-Dopman, D. & Park-Taylor, J. (2013). Sacred adolescence: Practical suggestions for psychologists working with adolescents’ religious and spiritual identity. Spirituality in Clinical Practice, 1(S), 40-52. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/2326-4500.1.S.40

Summary: The summary should be written in your own words (no direct quotes). It should describe the main idea presented in the article. Typically this would include a description of what research question was explored, and what conclusion(s) were reached.

Strengths or Weaknesses: Based on your evaluation, or on information provided in the text of your article, comment on the reliability of the results reported in this article.

Evaluation: What is your evaluation of this article? For full credit, your evaluation must go beyond a simple statement of “like” or “dislike.” Tell whether or not you found the article helpful, and explain why. Remember that your annotation should contain at least 100, but not more than 200 words.

Syed, M., & Seiffge-Krenke, I. (2013). Personality development from adolescence to emerging adulthood: Linking trajectories of ego development to the family context and identity formation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104(2), 371-384. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0030070

Summary: The summary should be written in your own words (no direct quotes). It should describe the main idea presented in the article. Typically this would include a description of what research question was explored, and what conclusion(s) were reached.

Strengths or Weaknesses: Based on your evaluation, or on information provided in the text of your article, comment on the reliability of the results reported in this article.

Evaluation: What is your evaluation of this article? For full credit, your evaluation must go beyond a simple statement of “like” or “dislike.” Tell whether or not you found the article helpful, and explain why. Remember that your annotation should contain at least 100, but not more than 200 words.

Note:

No reference page is required for this assignment.