FOR PROF. XAVIER
PHIL 201
|
Value |
Criteria |
Levels of Achievement |
||
|
Points |
CONTENT |
Good / Excellent 100–120 |
Fair / Competent 60–99 |
Deficient 0–59 |
|
120 |
Development |
· Major points are stated clearly and are well-supported · Content is persuasive and comprehensive · Content and purpose of the writing is clear · Thesis has a strong claim · The audience is clear and appropriate for the topic · Supportive information (if required) is strong and addresses writing focus |
· Major points are addressed but clarity or support is limited · Content is somewhat persuasive or comprehensive · Content is inconsistent (lack of clear purpose and /or clarity) · Thesis could be stronger · Supportive information (if required) needs strengthening or does not address writing concepts |
· Major points are unclear and / or insufficiently supported · Content is missing essentials · Content has unsatisfactory purpose, focus, and clarity · Supportive information (if required) is missing |
|
|
|
Good / Excellent 30–40 |
Fair / Competent 15–29 |
Deficient 0–14 |
|
40 |
Organization and Structure |
· Writing is well-structured, clear, and easy to follow · Introduction compellingly forecasts the topic and thesis · Each paragraph is unified and has a clear central idea · Transitional wording is present throughout the writing · Conclusion is a logical end to the writing |
· Adequately organized with some areas difficult to follow · Introduction needs to provide a stronger gateway into the writing · Some paragraphs lack unity · Better transitions are needed to provide fluency of ideas · Conclusion is trite or barely serves its purpose |
· Organization and structure detract from the writer’s message · Introduction and / or conclusion is incomplete or missing · Paragraphs are not unified (more than one topic / missing or inadequate controlling and concluding sentences) · Transitions are missing · Conclusion, if present, fails to serve its purpose |
Response Paper Grading Rubric
|
Value |
Criteria |
Levels of Achievement |
||
|
|
FORM |
Good / Excellent 15–20 |
Fair / Competent 8–14 |
Deficient 0–7 |
|
20 |
Grammar and Diction
|
· The writing reflects grammatical, punctuation, and spelling standards · Language is accurate, appropriate, and effective · Writing’s tone is appropriate and highly effective |
· The writing contains some grammatical, punctuation, and / or spelling errors · Language is unclear, awkward or inappropriate in parts · The writing’s tone is generally appropriate and moderately effective |
· The writing contains many grammatical, punctuation and / or spelling errors · Language use is largely inaccurate or inappropriate · The writing’s tone is ineffective and / or inappropriate |
|
|
|
Good / Excellent 15–20 |
Fair / Competent 8–14 |
Deficient 0–7 |
|
20 |
Format |
· Writing correctly follows formatting guidelines · Parenthetical and bibliographical source citations are used correctly and appropriately |
· Writing follows most formatting guidelines, but some flaws are detected · Parenthetical and bibliographical source citations are incorrectly formatted or used |
· Writing lacks many elements of correct formatting · Parenthetical and bibliographical source citations and / or references are not provided |
Page 2 of 2