2 papers need editing and revising.
FA_SPL_W9_Instructions_INCOMPLETE.docx
Observation Techniques: Film Analysis
This week, you will analyze a three- to five-minute section of a movie or a television episode depicting aggression, conflict, and peacemaking.
After watching the movie section, create a report on your analysis. In your report:
· Mention the name of the movie.
· Describe the setting and overall storyline of the movie.
· Describe the main characters in the observed movie section.
Do NOT overkill on describing the above. Please refer to the example provided, and focus on the below in more detail.
· Describe the situation that you analyzed and interpret the action of the characters depicting aggression, conflict, and peacemaking.
· Draw conclusions based on social psychological concepts and theories.
Movies to choose from:
The Kingdom
Ghandi (1982)
Shooting Dogs (2005)
Shake Hands with the Devil (2007)
Invictus (2009)
Schindler's List (1993)
FA_SPL_W10_Instructions_INCOMPLETE.docx
Observation Techniques: Film Analysis
This week, you will analyze a three- to five-minute section of a movie or a television episode depicting social psychology in the courtroom.
After watching the movie section, create a three- to four-page report on your analysis. In your report:
· Mention the name of the movie.
· Describe the setting and overall storyline of the movie.
· Describe the main characters in the observed movie section.
Do NOT overkill on describing the above. Please refer to the example provided, and focus on the below in more detail.
· Describe the situation that you analyzed and interpret the action of the characters depicting social psychology in the courtroom.
· Draw conclusions based on social psychological concepts and theories.
Movies to choose from:
A Time to Kill
To Kill a Mockingbird
Anatomy of a Murder
A Few Good Men
And Justice for All (1979)
I need you to go through this paper and make sure that everything is pieced together properly. I already know that the last 2 sections have not been properly covered (the GREEN area). This is due to poor work on a prior tutor; not bashing, simply stating facts as I gave the tutor several chances at correction being as though I assigned this a week in advance to ensure quality. The movie that is grey is the one that the prior tutor chose to do the assignment on. It is attached as well.
TR_FA_Example.docx
Running head: FILM ANALYSIS: THE COLOR PURPLE 1
FILM ANALYSIS: THE COLOR PURPLE 6
Film Analysis: The Color Purple
Film Analysis: The Color Purple
The movie at hand, ‘’The Color Purple’’ is a Steven Spielberg directed American period drama of 1985 highlighting the plight of the African American women in the beginning of 1900s through Celie Harris who is a young African American girl. The movie is based on the novel titled ‘’ The Color Purple’’ by Alice Walker. The film primarily covers both diversity among the races and gender issues; specifically the challenges that women, especially of color, faced at the time which included including poverty, racism, and sexism (Walker, 1998). Comment by Author: Film titles are italicized. Comment by Author: This is brief, but I’m familiar with the film. Comment by Author: Book titles, like film titles, are italicized. Comment by Author: Additional spacing between paragraphs incorrect.
In terms of storyline, The Color Purple is set in Celie’s point of view as evident with her speaking in first person in her private letters to God and Nettie (Walker, 1998). In the letters, Celie, who doubles up as the protagonist, writes about her actions; what she hears, sees, and feels. All of this is in a confessional and uninhibited tone (Walker, 1998). The cause of Celie’s writing letters to God is the frequent raping and beatings by her father Alphonso which resulted in the Celie giving birth to a baby girl, whom Celie was told was later killed by her father in the woods. Alphonso’s abuse of Celie continues even after him bringing a second wife into the home, following the death of Celie’s mother (Walker, 1998). Comment by Author: This offers additional summary on the plot. Good.
The story development unfolds in Celie’s sister, Nettie being approached by Mister for marriage, but as it turns out the man has another lover, a traveling singer. Therefore, Alphonso, their father refuses and instead offers Celie to the man (Walker, 1998).The marriage between Celie and Mister turns out to be a joyless and a very difficult one. On the other hand, Nettie runs from home and ends up seeking refuge at Celie’s troubled house where Celie’s abusive husband openly displays a distasteful lust for Nettie. He attempts to make some love advances, but Nettie is not interested. This provokes him to banish her from his home and property (Walker, 1998). Comment by Author: This is all interesting but exceeds what the assignment wants. The idea is to give a brief summary of the film as a whole followed by a focus on a short segment.
Celie’s difficult marriage is showing no signs of improving, even leading to the sister of her husband to call upon her to fight the abusive man. To this level the women are struggling to fight for their rights as evident in Harpo’s wife; Sofia defies any abuse form Harpo and Mister. Celie’s co-wife gets sick and is taken into Celie’s house for care, and it is while she stays here that they discovered written letters from Nettie about her missionary work with Samuel and Corrine who are married couples with adopted children. As fate would have it, Nettie’s would-be lover (Samuel) reveals that the adopted children are actually Celie’s alleged stolen and killed children.
The film’s story gets into a twists at the point where it is discovered that Alphonso was actually a stepfather to Nettie and Celie, and he was only after inheriting Celie’s house after her husband was whisked away by the whites for refusing to yield to their demands; another example of the diversity contained within this film. Later on, Celie becomes financially stable and reconciles with Mister in forgiving him, but she does not go back to him. Sofia rejoins with Harpo in reconciling their marriage, and Nettie and Samuel get married. Upon marrying Tashi, Samuel’s son Adam is forced to undergo the same circumcision pain that her wife underwent during the traditional female genital circumcision in solidarity.
As one goes through the storyline of the film, the main focus that is brought to light is that the womenfolk, especially the African Americans in the 1900’s, faced some critical sexism issues. That entails issues like rape, financial instability due to gender, and undergoing traditional rites; which are barbaric in nature and past with time (Walker, 2011).That is evident with the main characters in the film including Celie, Sofia, Nettie and Tashi. For instance, Celie is forced to call it quits between her and her husband following a difficult relationship due to cheating and financial instability, among other abuses (Walker, 2011). However, after becoming financially stable, they reconcile with the husband as she is now independent. That applies to Sofia and her husband as well. Comment by Author: Correct. Comment by Author: Also correct. Comment by Author: This is not tied specifically to either a cultural or gender issue. Just because it involves a man and a woman does not make it a gender issue.
That is a demonstration that women were at that time viewed as a weaker sex, because they were not financially stable and had to succumb to the man’s or husband’s whim, but for those who were capable in one or another like Sofia with her strength overpowering men’s managed to lead an independent life free from abuses (Dudden, 2011). In other words, womenfolk have always been denied the rightful opportunity in the society to the growing male chauvinism but the conditions is slowly changing upon women leading independent lifestyles due to financial stability and some strength of sort that makes the men recognize them as humans (Dudden, 2011). Comment by Author: This is better because the explanation connects an action to an idea under consideration. Comment by Author: Good.
In terms of diversity, the movie addresses the racial boundaries between blacks and whites at this time; which is reminiscent of the slavery era in America. More fundamentally, the movie depicts the story of migration from the South to the North, back and forth, by the black population who were undergoing a lot of suffering at the hands of their white masters, and as such, they were in search of greener pastures. The film also shows a brief depiction of their return to their homeland after attaining freedom (Abel, 1997). Comment by Author: Well, it was meant to recall that period, but I get your point. Comment by Author: This is highly pertinent, but exactly how does it show a cultural issue? You don’t explain.
The south-North movement depicted in the film in view of Celie’s story is a demonstration of the long standing problems that the black population was undergoing from the slave owners as well as the threat that is presented to the black cultural identity; as evident in the attempt to change Celie’s dialect (Abel, 1997). Celie’s returning to the South in the movie is a demonstration of the black’s reclamation of the lost space and freedom at the hands of their white counterparts (Abel, 1997). This insinuates that the blacks are meant to undergo certain things in life; such as persevering as they seek resources from the white developed land for them to succeed in life having learned about the rich cultures and civilizations that existed within white society that they were initially not privy to (Abel, 1997). Comment by Author: This is better; a little awkward in expression but clear enough in intent.
Reference Comment by Author: References (you have more than one).
Abel, E. (1997). Female subjects in black and white: Race, psychoanalysis, feminism. Berkeley, Calif. [u.a.: Univ. of California Press. Comment by Author: Titles are italicized and something happened with the publication information.
Dudden, F. E. (2011). Fighting chance: The struggle over woman suffrage and Black suffrage in Reconstruction America. New York: Oxford University Press. Comment by Author: Book titles are italicized.
Walker, A. (1998). The color purple. S.l.: Warner. Comment by Author: Please see the announcement posted in the classroom for how to handle electronic sources and/or visit the Purdue OWL.
Walker, A. (2011). The Color Purple.
Week 3, Assignment 1 Instructor Feedback
Thank you, for your work on this assignment. Below is the rubric for this assignment. Following the rubric you will find a summary of my remarks. However, please be sure to also examine my comments on your paper.
|
|
|
Your paper works awfully hard. I appreciate the effort. I would like to relieve you of some of the labor, though. You do not need to provide as much description as plot as you do. As I point out in the margin notes, the idea is to offer a brief summary of the setting and overall plot, then to focus on a specific scene with the specific actions of a specific character (or characters). You do offer some details gleaned from here and there throughout the film, but that is not entirely the same thing. I also appreciated your effort to bring in a source that helps contextualize and explain what is going on in the film.
SPL_9_ROUGH DRAFT.docx
GANDHI (1982) MOVIE REVIEW 2
GANDHI (1982) MOVIE REVIEW 5
Gandhi (1982) Movie Review
Student Name
Running head: GANDHI (1982) MOVIE REVIEW 1
Institution
This movie is about the famous Indian peaceful agitator for independence. It is a tale of the life of this great man who had dedicated himself to the struggle for the freedom of the Indian people from the British rule. It was produced in the year 1982 by Richard Attenborough. It is based on the autobiography of Mahatma Gandhi were he gave a detailed description of his journey in life and how he came to be involved in the Indian national politics. The film presents the chronological and realistic account of the life of this political activist.
The movie begins at the end when an assassin shots this man at an event (Attenborough, 1982). This shooting is instigated by Gandhi’s stand on the British rule and the best approach to be adopted by the people to overturn the situation. After the seeing incident, mourners pour out into the streets calling this a national tragedy. His death was a loss to the whole nation due to his commitment to the freedom of his people. The struggle had taken Gandhi to South Africa where he had gone to practice law.
His first experience with the South African authorities was when he was sent to the third class component of the train even though he held the first class ticket. This was due to racial discrimination that was propagated by the colonial government in that African country. He refused to be treated so poorly, and in making a fuss, he found himself thrown out. This is the beginning of the non-violent attempts that he would later make in his life as an activist. He was inspired by this incident to create a society where everyone is equal and to fight against the racial segregation.
His success in South Africa takes him back to his home country where his heroism is acknowledged. He, however, meets stringent opposition from the British government that commits itself to ensure that the same changes are not seen in the Indian society (Canby, 1982).
His attempt to bring about the stop in the oppression through the non-violent means seem to meet a lot of frustrations.
The British government sends him to jail several times while the people engage the government in armed struggle. He finds himself in prison several times as the violence escalates. He goes on hunger strike for the cruel murder of peaceful protesters and again when he figured out about the struggles between the Muslims and the Hindus. The scene that captures aggression, conflict and peacemaking are when the movie shows the Indian civilians, mostly children and women, being shot by the firing squad which looked like the East Asian or Chinese mercenary troops.
This scene is very brutal and cruel as the lieutenant defends the decision and orders the continuation of the firing until more than one thousand people were killed. The Indians had been involved in the aggressive struggle with the British authorities in the agitation for their freedom. It was a series of armed struggle and violence that had lead to the killing of the over one thousand women and children. Gandhi reacts to this act with great sorrow and hence a turning point in the movie (Attenborough, 1982).
He chooses to use the peaceful demonstration and to inspire the people to stand up against the British oppression and to liberate their country. In the end, Gandhi manages to achieve his aim of liberating his country. This scene is not just about India but rather about the brutality of the colonial rule. The white people had invaded Africa, Asia and the Americas to exercise their control over them. They were very oppressive and inhumane in their treatment of the colonies.
They would do anything to prevent them from losing the iron grip on the people, including killing them. The high-handedness could be seen in their retaliation for the attempts by the population to wrestle themselves out of the control. The other lesson that the many freedom fighters out there could learn from this section is that the non-violent means was a viable and the most suitable approach to the struggle. This is because the colonialists were better trained and better equipped than the indigenous people.
They had all the powerful machinery to kill anyone who stood in their way. The most efficient way to avoid the killings was to use the peaceful mass demonstrations. You can kill the people, but you cannot kill the spirit of a vast number of people who are united for a common purpose. The section hence does not just tell the story of this great man, but rather the commitment of the Indians and their struggle for freedom. It highlights the sacrifices that the people had to make to free themselves of the white man’s rule.
The same sacrifices and brutality were replicated in the other parts of the world especially in Africa that had numerous counts of colonial oppression and racial discrimination. Gandhi’s life offers a significant example to the leaders who aspire to lead the people and serve them (Canby, 1982). From the onset, this man loved his people, and he committed himself to liberating them. He lived a modest life, not putting material possessions ahead of his leadership role. This part of the film is a testimony that a committed spirit of the people coupled with good leadership has the power to bring about change in the society.
Reference
Canby. V (1982) Gandhi (1982). New York Times. Movies. http://www.nytimes.com/movie/review?res=EE05E7DF173BB12CAB484CC2B7799E83 6896
Attenborough. R (1982) Gandhi 1982.
FA_EXAMPLE.docx
FILM ANALYSIS 1
FILM ANALYSIS 4
12 Years a Slave Review
“12 Years a Slave” is an Oscar-winning movie produced in 2013. It cast famous characters like Brad Pitt and Lupita Nyong’o, who came to win the Oscars for her supportive role in the film. The movie is based on the actual accounts of Solomon, a former slave, who had been freed by his friends (McQueen, 2013). The book that the film is based upon was first published in 1853 when this man had been released from bondage, and he had given a firsthand account of his story.
The story is set in the period when the blacks were held as slaves in the US. It is a true story of a man who is forced to fight for his freedom hence his survival in the society where the white masters would do anything to make a black man a slave. This was the American society before the Civil War. Solomon Northup is initially a free man living in the upstate New York; a violinist. Unfortunately, he is abducted and sold out as a slave. He is subjected to cruelty by his new owner Michael Fassbender.
Even though Solomon had been the son of a slave, he was born free. He was married with two children by the time he was being kidnapped in 1841. Solomon was a talented player of the violin which he used to earn a living for his family.
The two men who abducted him had deceived him that they had a lucrative offer of playing the instrument in a circus. They had stereotyped Solomon in that they saw Solomon as a simple minded person because he was African. The two men, upon meeting Solomon, did not see a violin player who could add value to their shows; instead, he was a slave who was not supposed to be living freely like this man. Their actions were based on the prejudice that the black man was a slave and under no circumstance would he be free (Blair, I. V., 2002).
Solomon is faced with the difficulty of fighting to stay alive as well as to redeem his dignity that had been taken away the moment he was sold into slavery. He spends 12 years under the dominion of his slave owner who does with him as he pleases, including humiliation and hard labor. Solomon goes through a lot of injustice at the hands of racially motivated men simply because he was black. He was degraded and devalued to being worth nothing more than a common item of possession, and he almost became mentally and physically beat. The legacy of such a man would be robbed of the human virtues like integrity, justice and love (Rodriguez, 2007).This film is a testimony to the enduring hope and determination as well as the power of human spirit. Solomon went through all the ordeal of abuse, isolation, kidnapping, robbed identity, beating, emotional abuse, physical and psychological torture to force him into submission.
Despite all these dehumanizing experiences, his spirit remained unbroken. His worst sorrowful moments in the home of Edwin Epps, he remained strong, despite several attempts to break him. He did not for once give up his hope of freedom. He believed that just a word to his friends in the north would get him free. His faith and hope triumphed all the sorrows and horrors he had gone through. This changed, however, when he met an abolitionist from Canada, who had committed himself to freeing this man that had been held hostage unfairly.
The story of Solomon highlights the physical, emotional and psychological abuse to which the slaves were subjected (Fountain, 2010). Even after Solomon was freed and had come home to his wife and children his mental state was never the same. It could easily be assessed that the trauma he went through had possibly caused him to develop general anxiety disorder as well as PTSD (Kerr, L. K., 2014); he dreamt and relived a lot of what he had gone through.
References
Blair, I. V. (2002). The malleability of automatic stereotypes and prejudice. Personality and
Social Psychology Review, 6(3), 242-261. doi:10.1207/S15327957PSPR0603_8
Fountain. D. L (2010) Slavery, Civil War, and Salvation: African American Slaves and Christianity, 1830-1870. Baton Rounge. Louisiana State University Press. Kerr, L. K., (2014) Post-traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). Encyclopedia of Critical
Psychology., 1466-1468. doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-5583-7_347
McQueen. S (2013) Twelve Years a Slave. Film
Rodriguez, J. P. (2007). Slavery in the United States: A social, political, and historical encyclopedia. Santa Barbara, Calif: ABC-CLIO.