· Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.
· Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length.
The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:
· Analyze how compensation practice can be applied to positively impact an organization and its stakeholders.
· Examine the ways in which laws, labor unions, and market factors impact companies’ compensation practices.
· Evaluate the effectiveness of traditional bases for pay (seniority and merit) against incentive-based and person-focused compensation approaches.
· Use technology and information resources to research issues in compensation management.
· Write clearly and concisely about compensation management using proper writing mechanics.
Grading for this assignment will be based on answer quality, logic / organization of the paper, and language and writing skills, using the following rubric.
Grading Rubric
1. Briefly describe the company you researched, its compensation strategy, best practices they are applying, and compensation-related challenges they are facing. Weight: 10%--
Levels of Achievement:
Unacceptable Below 60% F 0 (0%) - 14.98 (5.99%)
Did not submit or incompletely described the company you researched, its compensation strategy, best practices they are applying, and compensation-related challenges they are facing.
Meets Minimum Expectations 60-69% D 15 (6%) - 17.48 (6.99%)
Insufficiently described the company you researched, its compensation strategy, best practices they are applying, and compensation-related challenges they are facing.
Fair 70-79% C 17.5 (7%) - 19.98 (7.99%)
Partially described the company you researched, its compensation strategy, best practices they are applying, and compensation-related challenges they are facing.
Proficient 80-89% B 20 (8%) - 22.48 (8.99%)
Satisfactorily described the company you researched, its compensation strategy, best practices they are applying, and compensation-related challenges they are facing.
Exemplary 90-100% A 22.5 (9%) - 25 (10%)
Thoroughly described the company you researched, its compensation strategy, best practices they are applying, and compensation-related challenges they are facing.
Feedback:
BUS409-A1-2
2. Analyze how your company applies compensation practice to determine the positive or negative impact to the company and its stakeholders. Weight: 25%--
Levels of Achievement:
Unacceptable Below 60% F 0 (0%) - 37.48 (14.99%)
Did not submit or incompletely analyzed how your company applies compensation practice to determine the positive or negative impact to the company and its stakeholders.
Meets Minimum Expectations 60-69% D 37.5 (15%) - 43.72 (17.49%)
Insufficiently analyzed how your company applies compensation practice to determine the positive or negative impact to the company and its stakeholders.
Fair 70-79% C 43.75 (17.5%) - 49.98 (19.99%)
Partially analyzed how your company applies compensation practice to determine the positive or negative impact to the company and its stakeholders.
Proficient 80-89% B 50 (20%) - 56.22 (22.49%)
Satisfactorily analyzed how your company applies compensation practice to determine the positive or negative impact to the company and its stakeholders.
Exemplary 90-100% A 56.25 (22.5%) - 62.5 (25%)
Thoroughly analyzed how your company applies compensation practice to determine the positive or negative impact to the company and its stakeholders.
Feedback:
BUS409-A1-3
3. Examine the ways in which laws, labor unions, and market factors impact the company’s compensation practices. Provide specific examples to support your response. Weight: 25%--
Levels of Achievement:
Unacceptable Below 60% F 0 (0%) - 37.48 (14.99%)
Did not submit or incompletely examined the ways in which laws, labor unions, and market factors impact the company’s compensation practices. Did not submit or incompletely provided specific examples to support your response.
Meets Minimum Expectations 60-69% D 37.5 (15%) - 43.72 (17.49%)
Insufficiently examined the ways in which laws, labor unions, and market factors impact the company’s compensation practices. Insufficiently provided specific examples to support your response.
Fair 70-79% C 43.75 (17.5%) - 49.98 (19.99%)
Partially examined the ways in which laws, labor unions, and market factors impact the company’s compensation practices. Partially provided specific examples to support your response.
Proficient 80-89% B 50 (20%) - 56.22 (22.49%)
Satisfactorily examined the ways in which laws, labor unions, and market factors impact the company’s compensation practices. Satisfactorily provided specific examples to support your response.
Exemplary 90-100% A 56.25 (22.5%) - 62.5 (25%)
Thoroughly examined the ways in which laws, labor unions, and market factors impact the company’s compensation practices. Thoroughly provided specific examples to support your response.
Feedback:
BUS409-A1-4
4. Evaluate the effectiveness of traditional bases for pay at the company you researched. Weight: 25%--
Levels of Achievement:
Unacceptable Below 60% F 0 (0%) - 37.48 (14.99%)
Did not submit or incompletely evaluated the effectiveness of traditional bases for pay at the company you researched.
Meets Minimum Expectations 60-69% D 37.5 (15%) - 43.72 (17.49%)
Insufficiently evaluated the effectiveness of traditional bases for pay at the company you researched.
Fair 70-79% C 43.75 (17.5%) - 49.98 (19.99%)
Partially evaluated the effectiveness of traditional bases for pay at the company you researched.
Proficient 80-89% B 50 (20%) - 56.22 (22.49%)
Satisfactorily evaluated the effectiveness of traditional bases for pay at the company you researched.
Exemplary 90-100% A 56.25 (22.5%) - 62.5 (25%)
Thoroughly evaluated the effectiveness of traditional bases for pay at the company you researched.
Feedback:
BUS409-A1-5
5. 3 references. Weight: 5%--
Levels of Achievement:
Unacceptable Below 60% F 0 (0%) - 7.48 (2.99%)
No references provided
Meets Minimum Expectations 60-69% D 7.5 (3%) - 8.72 (3.49%)
Does not meet the required number of references; all references poor quality choices.
Fair 70-79% C 8.75 (3.5%) - 9.98 (3.99%)
Does not meet the required number of references; some references poor quality choices.
Proficient 80-89% B 10 (4%) - 11.22 (4.49%)
Meets number of required references; all references high quality choices.
Exemplary 90-100% A 11.25 (4.5%) - 12.5 (5%)
Exceeds number of required references; all references high quality choices.
Feedback:
BUS409-A1-6
6. Clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements. Weight: 10%--
Levels of Achievement:
Unacceptable Below 60% F 0 (0%) - 14.98 (5.99%)
More than 8 errors present
Meets Minimum Expectations 60-69% D 15 (6%) - 17.48 (6.99%)
7-8 errors present
Fair 70-79% C 17.5 (7%) - 19.98 (7.99%)
5-6 errors present
Proficient 80-89% B 20 (8%) - 22.48 (8.99%)
3-4 errors present
Exemplary 90-100% A 22.5 (9%) - 25 (10%)
%7B%220.04500
an%20class%3D
%7B%220.06000
rcent%27%3E%2
%7B%220.08000
rangePercent%27
%7B%220.07000
%7B%220.08000
%7B%220.09000
8%20%3Cspan%
2C%220.1660000
%20%3A%20%2
3Cspan%20class
class%3D%27ran
ePercent%27%3E
%3Cspan%20cla
3A%20%2252.98
%29%3C%2Fspa
4.55%20%3Cspa
11.42%20%3Csp
rcent%27%3E%2
8000%22%20%3
%25%29%3C%2
pan%20class%3
%20%3Cspan%2
%7B%220.03000
%7B%220.03500
%7B%220.04000
VonnieVonnie
bus_409_compensation_management1.docx
0
