8 pages writing paper work- Alicja.. NEED 100% ORIGINAL WRITING, no plagiarism work
HUM 320 - American Eateries Observation Project and Paper.pdf
American Eateries Observation Project and Paper
Project is worth 20% of your grade.
This observation project is an opportunity for students to apply their understanding of concepts such as
gender, class and race/ethnicity that are used by Anthropologists in studies of people across the world.
In their daily life choices, human beings construct social identities for themselves that become
expressed through food, dress, and sociability and who they socialize with.
You should go to a restaurant or cafeteria of your choosing, at least three times, and observe the
people. You should look for the following:
a) The interplay of gender roles and norms, observable in how people dress, their habits of speech
and communication with each other, and other behaviors. Did you see a rite of passage in
which gender roles are heightened, such as a family party or a romantic date? Sometimes,
expressions of sexuality are also observable. Often power dynamics are present in
male/females relations. How were the power dynamics expressed? See in the Culture Counts
textbook, pp. 237-252.
b) How socioeconomic class is constructed, again observable by how people dress, their speech
patterns, and how they interact with each other. See in the Culture Counts textbook, pp. 185-
195. One question you ask yourself is how are these people expressing or maybe suppressing
their status and prestige? Often people express their social status through expensive clothes
and jewelry, or with their use of a smart-phone, or by the way they talk to the employees of the
restaurant.
c) What ethnic groups were present? How did people’s ethnic identity shape how they acted and
interacted with others at the restaurant? An example would be if the people spoke a certain
language or dialect, or dressed a certain way. When race and ethnic differences were present,
how did the people deal with each other? Were inter-racial families and relationships present?
See in the Culture Counts textbook, pp. 198-209.
d) Maybe the forces of globalization and transnationalism factor into the particular restaurant
where you are doing your observations. Does the restaurant represent cuisine from another
country? Are the customers from other countries? How about the employees? An example
would be if you chose an Asian Indian restaurant, and it is clear that the people working there
are from India. How are they adapting themselves and their food for the consumption of
mainstream Americans? How is a tourist from another country adapting themselves to an
American eatery?
You should take notes on your observations either while you are in the restaurant or shortly after you
leave. You should not speak to the people, nor find out their names. This project is strictly
observational. The people should remain anonymous in your paper.
The paper should be at least 6 pages long, double-spaced, and typed in 12 point font. You should cover
a) thru c) in the above outline and d) globalization, if it is present, along with any other pertinent social
characteristics such as age, maybe religion, maybe sexuality, and regional identity (rural or urban). The
following rubric provides an outline for how your paper should be organized.
Grading Rubric and Outline for the project paper: Total points possible is 20 points.
I. The Introduction: Describe the eatery and the kind of people you observed there. What kind of place is it? Where is the eatery located? What are the typical kind of people you observe there - such as working class males, students, elderly, families, multi-ethnic or a certain ethnicity, etc? Briefly note the highlights from your observations – that is, summarize what you observed in general about gender, class and race/ethnicity.
3 points possible, based upon: - How well did you describe the eatery, its
location, and the people there? - How well did you present the highlights
from your observations on gender, class, race/ethnicity and other relevant social characteristics?
II. The body of your paper should deal with two distinct sets of observations that describe the people and analyze the interplay of social identity (gender, class and race/ethnicity) and behavior. That is, you should have observations from two different sets of people and their interactions. You should write the descriptive part as vignettes (short stories) describing your observations with the details. After each vignette, provide an analysis of how gender, class and ethnicity came into play and were expressed.
10 points possible, based upon: - Did you cover two sets of observations? - How well you described the social
situations with details important for your analysis.
- Quality of the analysis – determined by how well you used the concepts of gender, class, race/ethnicity, and other relevant concepts such as sexuality or globalization in analyzing the social situations.
III. The conclusion: What did you learn about gender, class and ethnicity from this observational project? How did it make you more aware of the different components of your own social identity?
4 points possible, based upon: - Did your conclusion provide insights on
gender, class, and race/ethnicity, and what you learned about the everyday social construction of identity in America (and in Connecticut)?
- Did you write yourself into the project by self-reflection upon how you construct your social identity?
Formatting - You should proof the paper and edit it for writing errors and quality of writing. Wherever you quote from the textbook or other sources, you should provide an in-text citation. An example of an in-text citation for quoted material from the textbook is - (Nanda and Warms, 2015, p. 198). If you do quote or paraphrase from sources that are not the textbook, then add a bibliography at the end of your paper.
3 points possible, based upon: - Was the paper carefully proofed for
writing errors and grammatical mistakes? - Was the paper edited for conciseness and
the development of sentences and paragraphs, and organized well for logical flow?
- Were citations provided for quoted material?
Observation Project-book content .pdf
Grading Rubrick.docx
Assignment Rubric Detail
|
|
Levels of Achievement |
||
|
Criteria |
Does NOT Meet Expectations |
Meets Expectations |
Exceeds Expectations |
|
Content: Accurate and Relevant |
0 to 18 points Topic is still in the brainstorming mode. Writer has not decided on a main idea. Information is limited or unclear Writer has not begun to define the topic in a meaningful way |
19 to 21 points Very broad topic Ideas are reasonably clear but does not detail or expand to show depth of understanding Writer had difficulty going from general observations to specifics No clear theme is seen |
22 to 25 points Topic is narrow and manageable Consistently accurate and relevant Quality details give reader important information that goes beyond obvious and predictable Insight proves an understanding of topic significance |
|
Analysis & Justification: Depth, Comprehension and Logic |
0 to 18 points Confusing analysis of objectives, no depth or understanding of content Reader has no idea what main idea or point of topic was Ideas reveal nothing of the topic or view of writer Sequencing of ideas are random and not supported or developed |
19 to 21 points Occasional analysis demonstrates depth and basic understanding of objectives Reader is left with questions Shows some logic, but does not always support the development of ideas Ideas show some sequencing but not enough to support development |
22 to 25 points Demonstrates depth and understanding of objectives throughout Reader’s questions are anticipated and answered Ideas are fresh, original and logical Fluency in arrangement of ideas and content |
|
Process: Clear and Precise |
0 to 18 points Writer seems indifferent to the topic and content and fails to connect with the reader. Writer lacks purpose and does not meet ideas Word choices and language reflect no thought of writer and detract from meaning Writer avoids any personal detail to ideas |
19 to 21 points Writer connects with reader but in an impersonal manner Writer lacks consistent engagement with the topic, and fails to use ideas to build credibility Word choices and language reflect little thought of writer and reader is not engaged Writer occasionally reveals personal detail but avoids risk taking in detailing ideas |
22 to 25 points Writer connects with reader throughout the focus of the topic Writer reflects a strong commitment to the topic by careful selection of ideas that show why the reader needs information Word choices and language reflect powerful and engaging content for the reader Writer takes a risk by including personal detail to the ideas |
|
Grammar & Sources/Citations |
0 to 18 points Grammar and usage errors are very noticeable and affect the meaning of the content Does not meet the number of required sources for the assignment More than 5 errors in APA format or does not follow APA format |
19 to 21 points Problems with grammar and usage do not distort the meaning of content but are not always correct or accurate Only meets required number of sources for an assignment. No more than 1-5 errors in APA format |
22 to 25 points Grammar and usage are correct and contribute to clarity and style of writer Surpasses required number of sources for an assignment No errors in the APA format |