Investigating Meaningful Teaching Interview
Investigating Meaningful Teaching Interview
|
|
1 Unsatisfactory 0.00% |
2 Less than Satisfactory 65.00% |
3 Satisfactory 75.00% |
4 Good 85.00% |
5 Excellent 100.00% |
|
|
100.0 %% Scaling |
|
|||||
|
40.0 % Content Subject Knowledge |
Interview was with only one teacher (either a self-contained teacher or an inclusive teacher). Not all of the six questions were asked and the reflection is missing. |
Interview was with only one teacher (either a self-contained teacher or an inclusive teacher). Not all of the six questions were addressed or the reflection was missing. |
Interview was conducted with a self-contained and an inclusive teacher. All six questions were addressed, but reflection was missing, or reflection was complete, but not all questions were addressed. |
Interview was conducted with a self-contained and an inclusive teacher. All six questions were addressed, but reflection was minimal. |
Interview was conducted with a self-contained and an inclusive teacher. All six questions were addressed and a reflection was included. |
|
|
30.0 % Content Comprehension |
Content is incomplete or omits most of the requirements stated in the assignment criteria. |
Content is incomplete or omits some requirements stated in the assignment criteria. |
Content is complete, but somewhat inaccurate and/or irrelevant. Research is inadequate in relevance, quality, and/or timeliness. |
Content is comprehensive and accurate. Research is adequate, timely, and relevant, and addresses all of the issues stated in the assignment criteria. |
Content is comprehensive, accurate, and persuasive. Research is adequate, timely, and relevant, and addresses all of the issues stated in the assignment criteria. |
|
|
10.0 % Thesis Development and Purpose |
Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. |
Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear. |
Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose. |
Thesis and/or main claim are clear, forecasting development of paper. It is descriptive, reflective of the arguments, and appropriate to the purpose. |
Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive; contained within the thesis is the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear. |
|
|
10.0 % Paragraph Development and Transitions |
Paragraphs and transitions consistently lack unity and coherence. No apparent connections between paragraphs. Transitions are inappropriate to purpose and scope. Organization is disjointed. |
Some paragraphs and transitions may lack logical progression of ideas, unity, coherence, and/or cohesiveness. Some degree of organization is evident. |
Paragraphs are generally competent, but ideas may show some inconsistency in organization and/or in their relationships to each other |
A logical progression of ideas between paragraphs is apparent. Paragraphs exhibit a unity, coherence, and cohesiveness. Topic sentences and concluding remarks are as appropriate to purpose. |
There is a sophisticated construction of paragraphs and transitions. Ideas progress and relate to each other. Paragraph and transition construction guide the reader. Paragraph structure is seamless. |
|
|
5.0 % Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) |
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are employed. |
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) and/or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. |
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. |
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. |
The writer is clearly in command of standard, written academic English. |
|
|
5.0 % Research Citations (in-text citations for paraphrasing and direct quotes, and references page listing and formatting, as appropriate to assignment and style) |
No references page and no citations are included. |
References page is present, but citations are inconsistently used. |
References page is included. Sources are appropriately documented, although some errors may be present. |
References page is present and fully inclusive of all cited sources. Documentation is appropriate and citation style is usually correct. |
In-text citations and a references page are complete. The documentation of cited sources is free of errors. |
|
|
100 % Total Weightage |
|
|