Healthcare Operation Management
FEATURE STORY Quint Studer making process improvement 'stick' There are five traits common to healthcare organizations that develop process improvement initiatives that successfully sustain gains. AT A GLANCE To sustain gains/rom II proceu improvement initiative, healtheare organizations should: ) E)tplain to slaH why II proccn improvement initiative is needed. ) Encourage leader$ within the organi:z:alion to champion the process improvement, and tie their evaluilltions to its outcomes. > Ensure thai both leaden and employees have the skills to help sustain the sought-after proceu improvements. Once again. health systems are investing heavily in process improvements. The latest push aims to curb costs to help hospitals survive in a market environment that increasingly demands greater efficiency in the delivery of care. Market drivers-including cost pressures associated with payment reform and the information boom-will demand a ~o to 40 percent improvement in overall efficiency. The multipronged approach required for such change will include performance improvement, clinical transformation, scale and integration, and asset rationalization. Such organizational changes will facilitate the ongoing shift from episodic to value -based care. In a March 2014 report to Congress, the Medicare Payment Advisory Commission identified three common traits of healthcare organizations with poor financial performance that were closing or on the brink of closure: ) Low occupancy ) High readmissions ) Poor patient satisfaction Although this finding underscores the critical nature of process improvement, it is also clear that we've been here before, and our effons to sustain process improvement gains over the long term never seem to stick. Why is it that so many process improvement tools- like reengineering and continuous quality improvement- that have worked so well in other industries struggle to take hold in health care? Many process improvement efforts in health care appear to achieve strong initial results. Such initiatives might stan with a big kickoff by the CEO to stir employee enthusiasm, but four years later, there tends to be little evidence to show whether goals were achieved, indicating a loss of momentum. The repeated failure to sustain process improvements in health care makes it more difficult to engage leaders, employees. and providers the next time a new initiative is introduced. They experience change fatigue. This is particularly true of physicians, who playa critical role in ensuring a health system's ability to compete under value-based care. Nonetheless. some organitations are able to sustain the gains and make process improvement ~stick.~ In our experience. these organitations share five traits in common. A Connection to the "Why" Although it seems obvious to tell people why an organization is changing a process. much more frequently. such conversations tend to focus only. or predominantly. on what is changing. Unlike workers in industries such as manufacturing. however. individuals who work in health care are intrinsically motivated and so are more invested in understanding the "why" of change. Nurses and physicians. in particular. need to understand why a new methodology improves clinical outcomes for patients or ensures a better work environment in which to practice medicine. One of the ways leaders in healthcare organizations that are able to sustain improvements address these needs. and communicate mutual expectations more clearly. is by moving to a more objective performance appraisal system. By more fairly rewarding high performers who align within organizational priorities. such a system better enables these organizations to sustain their missions. These organizations understand the importance of connecting to hearts and minds before asking for behavioral change . Change is unsettling. It creates pushback unless there is compelling evidence that the new best practice will advance the organization's mission to prOvide high-quality care for patients. even if it creates extra steps or inconvenience. When organizations can show that a new process will result in fewer infections or improved outcomes for stroke patients. providers' values will compel them to be receptive to the new process. This dynamic also is true for financial stewardship. By explaining to employees why dramatic cost reduction is necessary to enable the organization to remain solvent and sustain its mission to save lives. financial managers can improve provider and employee engagement. In year one, UConn Health saved approximately $1 million, which included standardization on hips, knees, and other high-cost implants through consolidation and price caps without eliminating choice. At UConn Health. an integrated academic health center with 5.000 employees and 500 unionized physicians in Farmington. Conn .. Anne Diamond, the CEO of the organiUltion's flagship hospital. debuted a comparative effectiveness committee in 2012. The committee's goal is to empower physicians to decide the best care for patients. while standardizing equipment and supplies fo r substantial cost savings. Every surgical specialty is represented. and all surgeon members receive one vote, as do administration and nursing. Representatives from procurement and contracting also attend. "If a surgeon wants an expensive piece of new equipment, the surgeon will present evidencebased literature on why the item will improve clinical quality and safety at a committee meeting for focused discussion and a vote by peers on whether to pilot or adopt it," Diamond says. MBy allowing physicians to build consensus on clinical quality and taking the mystery out of what thiugi cost, outstanding financials have followed.- In year one. UConn Health saved apprOximately $1 million, which included standardiUltion on hips. knees. and other high -cost implants through consolidation and price caps without eliminating choice. In year two, the organization saved $485,000 on implants. including spinal and mesh implants and prostheses for total hip arthroplasty. In 2014. the organization is on track to save $900,000 on biologics, spinal implants, Mma.or
total joints, custom packs, and its green initiative to reprocess reusable instruments. MNew surgeons come in with personal preferences," Diamond says. "So we set expectations early about how this peer-review process works. What physicians want are the best resources to do their jobs well. By hardwiring a process where they are empowered to make those decisions, the organization also wins.M Process Improvement as Part 0' an Organizational Framework When a process improvement is identified. it cannot be a stand-alone process. Organizations that are able to sustain performance improvement demonstrate evidence-based leadership that provides an execution framework for consistently reducing costs. improving clinical quality, and enhancing the patient experience, much as adherence to evidence -based medicine delivers better clinical outcomes for patients. Evidence-based leadershipSM reduces operational variability through three broad. consecutive steps: > Identifying and cascading organization goals or desired outcomes > Identifying and hardwiring necessary leadership behaviors > Selecting necessary processes and technology A 2012 study by lohns Hoplcins found that patients injured with head trauma on the weekend were 14 percent more likely to die than those injured on a weekday and found the Mweekend effect" also applied to heart attack. stroke, and aneurism care (Schneider, E.B .. et al.. "Beating the Weekend Trend: Increased Mortality in Older Adult Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) Patients Admitted on Weekends." Journal ofSurgical Research, October 2012). Beginning with the desired organizational or departmental outcomes, assigning objective performance metrics (i.e., goals that are aligned and cascaded for accountability), and closing skill gaps with prescriptive training sustains any process improvement. Generally, the healthcare industry is very capable of identifying processes that need improving. For instance, it has readily identified the need for new ITto improve up -front collections. However. the industry frequently fails to realize promised gains because it doesn't effectively maximize necessary behaviors for success. For instance , if hand -washing is identified as a mandatory behavior, how do organizations ensure all clinical staff consistently wash their hands? Validation is the key. If organizations don't validate, they may assume they have consistent behavior and waste ALIGNMENT THROUGH EVIDENCE·BASED LEADERSHlpslo4 ......... ,.... It M • , Go.ls .nd Skills Procen .nd Technology 92 JUNE 20M he.lthcarefln.nd.I ....... gement financial resources by investing in additional processes and technologies. Meanwhile. what is needed is consistent execution to see results. Compliance conserves resources. Achieving a "lean" organization is not the job of one individual or department. Rather. that goal is achieved by creating a culture in which leaders feel safe to raise questions about areas of opportunity. Although culture and alignment are foundational to success. many organizations neglect those aspects in favor of a narrow focus on implementation of lean tools and tactics. MStrong leadership is critical. but it's only one piece of great performance for our patients." says Scott Buchalter, MD. a pulmonologist and quality education officer for UAB Medicine, a regional not-for- profit academic medical center with six hospitals in Birmingham. Ala. Myou may get some wins with low-hanging fruit for some breakthrough projects, but you'll never sustain the gains or move to the next level to achieve continuous incremental improvements over time without quality improvement knowledge and skills among staff." UAB Medicine instituted a quality academy and partnered with the School of Health Professions at UAB. Now in its second semester, the academy aims to eventually develop a critical mass of improvement champions by moving physician, nurse, and administrative leaders with oversight responsibilities through its core semester-long curriculum on continuous process improvement. Although small teams initially learn the methods and focus on applying them on breakthrough projects, the real value occurs post-training. Buchalter says. MThese individuals are teaching and cascading the quality improvement methods they've learned 10 teams on their units," Buchalter says, MIt·S really about spreading expertise widely and deeply for incremental improvement with eventual 100 percent participation and accountability.~ Organizational Objectives Tied to Leader Performance Evaluations If we identify a process to improve outcomes but do not hold leaders accountable. we imply that alignment with organizational objectives is a matter of choice. In organizations that can sustain success in process improvements. individuals do not receive strong performance reviews without demonstrating such alignment. Weight a goal at 10 percent of a performance evaluation, and you create awareness; weight it at 20 percent. and you create focus. To create urgency, you need to weight it at 30 percent. Imagine, for example. that a hospital is working with a supplier to identify a new system for surgical supplies estimated to save $1.4 million over 12 months. A savings of$83S,ooo is bud - geted conservatively in year one while the process and new technology are implemented. Using evidence- based leadership as part of this process would require a first step of aligning the director of surgery's performance evaluation with the desired outcome. Because it is an urgent organizational priority, the goal is weighted at SAMPLE REVENUE CYCLE MANAGEMENT GOAL: CASH COLLECTIONS GOIII: Meet or exceed YTD cash collections lit 101 percent of the prior month's net totlll (less blld
FEATURE STORY Quint Studer making process improvement 'stick' There are five traits common to
healthcare organizations that develop process improvement initiatives that
successfully sustain gains. AT
A GLANCE To sustain gains/rom II proceu improvement initiative, healtheare organizations should: )
E)tplain to slaH why II proccn improvement initiative is needed. ) Encourage leader$ within the
organi:z:alion to champion the
process improvement, and tie their evaluilltions to its outcomes. >
Ensure thai both leaden and employees have the skills to help sustain the sought
-
after proceu
improvements. Once again. health systems are investing heavily in process improvements. The l
atest
push aims to curb costs to help hospitals survive in a market environment that increasingly demands
greater efficiency in the delivery of care. Market drivers
-
including cost pressures associated with
payment reform and the information boom
-
will deman
d a ~o to 40 percent improvement in overall
efficiency. The multipronged approach required for such change will include performance improvement,
clinical transformation, scale and integration, and asset rationalization. Such organizational changes will
fac
ilitate the ongoing shift from episodic to value
-
based care. In a March 2014 report to Congress, the
Medicare Payment Advisory Commission identified three common traits of healthcare organizations
with poor financial performance that were closing or on th
e brink of closure: ) Low occupancy ) High
readmissions ) Poor patient satisfaction Although this finding underscores the critical nature of process
improvement, it is also clear that we've been here before, and our effons to sustain process
improvement ga
ins over the long term never seem to stick. Why is it that so many process improvement
tools
-
like reengineering and continuous quality improvement
-
that have worked so well in other
industries struggle to take hold in health care? Many process improvement
efforts in health care appear
to achieve strong initial results. Such initiatives might stan with a big kickoff by the CEO to stir employee
enthusiasm, but four years later, there tends to be little evidence to show whether goals were achieved,
indicating
a loss of momentum. The repeated failure to sustain process improvements in health care
makes it more difficult to engage leaders, employees. and providers the next time a new initiative is
introduced. They experience change fatigue. This is particularly
true of physicians, who playa critical role
in ensuring a health system's ability to compete under value
-
based care. Nonetheless. some
organitations are able to sustain the gains and make process improvement ~stick.~ In our experience.
these organitations
share five traits in common. A Connection to the "Why" Although it seems obvious
to tell people why an organization is changing a process. much more frequently. such conversations
tend to focus only. or predominantly. on what is changing. Unlike workers in
industries such as
manufacturing. however. individuals who work in health care are intrinsically motivated and so are more
invested in understanding the "why" of change. Nurses and physicians. in particular. need to understand
why a new methodology improv
es clinical outcomes for patients or ensures a better work environment
in which to practice medicine. One of the ways leaders in healthcare organizations that are able to
sustain improvements address these needs. and communicate mutual expectations more cl
early. is by
moving to a more objective performance appraisal system. By more fairly rewarding high performers
who align within organizational priorities. such a system better enables these organizations to sustain
their missions. These organizations under
stand the importance of connecting to hearts and minds
before asking for behavioral change . Change is unsettling. It creates pushback unless there is compelling
evidence that the new best practice will advance the organization's mission to prOvide high
-
qu
ality care
for patients. even if it creates extra steps or inconvenience. When organizations can show that a new
process will result in fewer infections or improved outcomes for stroke patients. providers' values will
compel them to be receptive to the new
process. This dynamic also is true for financial stewardship. By
explaining to employees why dramatic cost reduction is necessary to enable the organization to remain
FEATURE STORY Quint Studer making process improvement 'stick' There are five traits common to
healthcare organizations that develop process improvement initiatives that successfully sustain gains. AT
A GLANCE To sustain gains/rom II proceu improvement initiative, healtheare organizations should: )
E)tplain to slaH why II proccn improvement initiative is needed. ) Encourage leader$ within the
organi:z:alion to champion the process improvement, and tie their evaluilltions to its outcomes. >
Ensure thai both leaden and employees have the skills to help sustain the sought-after proceu
improvements. Once again. health systems are investing heavily in process improvements. The latest
push aims to curb costs to help hospitals survive in a market environment that increasingly demands
greater efficiency in the delivery of care. Market drivers-including cost pressures associated with
payment reform and the information boom-will demand a ~o to 40 percent improvement in overall
efficiency. The multipronged approach required for such change will include performance improvement,
clinical transformation, scale and integration, and asset rationalization. Such organizational changes will
facilitate the ongoing shift from episodic to value -based care. In a March 2014 report to Congress, the
Medicare Payment Advisory Commission identified three common traits of healthcare organizations
with poor financial performance that were closing or on the brink of closure: ) Low occupancy ) High
readmissions ) Poor patient satisfaction Although this finding underscores the critical nature of process
improvement, it is also clear that we've been here before, and our effons to sustain process
improvement gains over the long term never seem to stick. Why is it that so many process improvement
tools- like reengineering and continuous quality improvement- that have worked so well in other
industries struggle to take hold in health care? Many process improvement efforts in health care appear
to achieve strong initial results. Such initiatives might stan with a big kickoff by the CEO to stir employee
enthusiasm, but four years later, there tends to be little evidence to show whether goals were achieved,
indicating a loss of momentum. The repeated failure to sustain process improvements in health care
makes it more difficult to engage leaders, employees. and providers the next time a new initiative is
introduced. They experience change fatigue. This is particularly true of physicians, who playa critical role
in ensuring a health system's ability to compete under value-based care. Nonetheless. some
organitations are able to sustain the gains and make process improvement ~stick.~ In our experience.
these organitations share five traits in common. A Connection to the "Why" Although it seems obvious
to tell people why an organization is changing a process. much more frequently. such conversations
tend to focus only. or predominantly. on what is changing. Unlike workers in industries such as
manufacturing. however. individuals who work in health care are intrinsically motivated and so are more
invested in understanding the "why" of change. Nurses and physicians. in particular. need to understand
why a new methodology improves clinical outcomes for patients or ensures a better work environment
in which to practice medicine. One of the ways leaders in healthcare organizations that are able to
sustain improvements address these needs. and communicate mutual expectations more clearly. is by
moving to a more objective performance appraisal system. By more fairly rewarding high performers
who align within organizational priorities. such a system better enables these organizations to sustain
their missions. These organizations understand the importance of connecting to hearts and minds
before asking for behavioral change . Change is unsettling. It creates pushback unless there is compelling
evidence that the new best practice will advance the organization's mission to prOvide high-quality care
for patients. even if it creates extra steps or inconvenience. When organizations can show that a new
process will result in fewer infections or improved outcomes for stroke patients. providers' values will
compel them to be receptive to the new process. This dynamic also is true for financial stewardship. By
explaining to employees why dramatic cost reduction is necessary to enable the organization to remain