see the description
|
GIANTS- Engaging In Art Presentation Title _____________________________Date: ______________ |
|
|
|
CATEGORY |
|
RESPONSIBILITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Content |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Organization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Visual Aids And Technology Use |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Delivery |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Resources |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GIANTS Engaging in Art Presentation Teacher name: DeCius Student Name: ____________________________________________________________ Title of Presentation: _____________________________________________________ |
|
CATEGORY |
Excellent-7 |
Average-5 |
Needs Improvement-3 |
|
Content - Accuracy |
All content throughout the presentation is accurate. There are no factual errors. |
Most of the content is accurate but there is one piece of information that seems inaccurate. |
Content confusing or contains more than one factual error. |
|
Sequencing of Information |
Information is organized in a clear, logical way. It is easy to anticipate the next slide. |
Most information is organized in a clear, logical way. One slide or piece of information seems out of place. |
There is no clear plan for the organization of information. |
|
Effectiveness |
Project includes all material needed to give a good understanding of the topic. The project is consistent with assignment. |
Project is lacking one or two key elements. Project is consistent with assignment most of the time. |
Project is lacking several key elements and has inaccuracies. Project is completely inconsistent with assignment. |
|
Use of Graphics |
All graphics are attractive (size and colors) and support the topic of the presentation. |
A few graphics are not attractive but all support the topic of the presentation. |
Several graphics are unattractive AND detract from the content of the presentation. |
|
Text - Font Choice & Formatting |
Font formats (color, bold, italic) have been carefully planned to enhance readability and content. |
Font formats have been carefully planned to enhance readability. |
Font formatting makes it very difficult to read the material. |
|
Spelling and Grammar |
Presentation has no misspellings or grammatical errors. |
Presentation has 1-2 misspellings, but no grammatical errors. |
Presentation has more than 2 grammatical and/or spelling errors.
|
|
CATEGORY |
Excellent-7 |
Average-5 |
Needs Improvement-3 |
|
MLA Format |
MLA format was used correctly in the Works Cited; all pictures, film clips, music clips, etc. were cited. |
MLA format was used correctly in most of the works in the Works Cited; most pictures, film clips, music clips, etc. were cited. |
MLA format was not used and/or there was no Works Cited. |
|
Delivery |
Student spoke at a good rate, volume and with good grammar. He/she maintained eye-contact while using, but not reading notes. |
Student spoke a little faster or slower than necessary, or too quietly or loudly. He/she used acceptable grammar. He/she maintained eye-contact, but relied too much on notes. |
Student demonstrated having paid little attention to rate, volume or grammar. He/she read nearly word for word from notes. |
|
Sources |
There were at least 5 sources, and one was a book. |
There were 3-4 sources or no book sources. |
There was only 1 source, or 1-2 but no book source. |
|
Timing |
Presentation was 3-10 minutes long, no more or less. |
Presentation was 1-2 minutes over or under. |
Presentation was more than 4 minutes over or under. |
TOTAL SCORE__________/70_________