Computer Science Assignment - Web publishing
AmazingExpert
assign_-_web_publishing.docTITLE :
1. Your assignment should be typed using 12 point Times New Roman font and 1.5 line spacing.
2. The clarity of writing presentation.
3. Follow ASSIGNMENT RUBRIC that is require & follow the CRITERIA need
4. Proper format (Cover Page, Table of Content, page numbering, APA format references, etc.)
5. Assignment should be between 2500 to 3000 words excluding references. The number of words should be shown at the end of your assignment.
ASSIGNMENT QUESTION
*Find and read the following articles on privacy issues on Facebook:
Article 1: Facebook’s Zuckerberg Says The Age of Privacy is Over by Marshall Kirkpatrick (2010).
Article 2: Why Facebook is Wrong: Privacy Is Still Important by Marshall Kirkpatrick
(2010).
a. Give a one-page summary for both of the articles.
b. State your stand on whether you agree with either one of the articles and provide supporting arguments.
c. Based on your observation, discuss how Facebook has changed the way we share information.
* Google is a useful resource for finding these papers.
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………..
Assignment should contain the following aspects:
· Introduction
· Summary of the 1st article
· Summary of the 2nd article
· Student’s stand about the privacy issues on Facebook
· Discussion on how Facebook changes the way people share information
· Conclusion
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………
ASSIGNMENT RUBRICS
|
Criteria |
|
Low |
Fair |
Above average |
Excellent |
|
|
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
|
Introduction
|
Wrong / No introduction. Salah / Tiada pengenalan. |
Provided only a brief statement regarding the introduction. Hanya memberikan pernyataan yang ringkas mengenai pengenalan. |
Provided basic explanation but there was limited description. Memberikan penerangan asas tetapi deskripsinya agak terbatas. |
Provided good explanation about the introduction but it can be improved further. Memberikan penerangan yang baik mengenai pengenalan tetapi ianya boleh dimantapkan lagi. |
Provided clear and concise explanation about the introduction. Memberikan penerangan yang jelas dan jitu mengenai pengenalan.
|
|
Summary of the 1st article |
Wrong / No summary provided. Salah / Tiada ringkasan diberikan. |
Poor summary. Contained factual errors. Ringkasan yang lemah. Mengandungi kesilapan fakta. |
Basic / Minimal summary and very similar to the article. Ringkasan yang asas / minimum dengan jawapan yang banyak persamaan dengan artikel.
|
Good summary that are related to the article but it can be improved further. Adequate points were given. Ringkasan yang baik dan berkaitan dengan artikel tetapi ia boleh diperbaiki lagi. Poin-poin yang mencukupi telah diberikan. |
In depth summary with excellent examples. The facts were coherent and clearly presented with own words. Ringkasan yang mendalam dengan contoh-contoh yang sangat sesuai. Fakta-fakta yang jelas dan dipersembahkan juga dengan jelas dengan perkataan sendiri. |
|
Summary of the 2nd article |
Wrong / No summary provided. Salah / Tiada ringkasan diberikan. |
Poor summary. Contained factual errors. Ringkasan yang lemah. Mengandungi kesilapan fakta. |
Basic / Minimal summary and very similar to the article. Ringkasan yang asas / minimum dengan jawapan yang banyak persamaan dengan artikel.
|
Good summary that are related to the article but it can be improved further. Adequate points were are given. Ringkasan yang baik dan berkaitan dengan artikel tetapi ia boleh diperbaiki lagi. Poin-poin yang mencukupi telah diberikan. |
In depth summary with excellent examples. The facts were coherent and clearly presented with own words. Ringkasan yang mendalam dengan contoh-contoh yang sangat sesuai. Fakta-fakta yang jelas dan dipersembahkan juga dengan jelas dengan perkataan sendiri. |
|
Student’s stand about the privacy issues on Facebook |
Wrong / No discussion provided. Salah / Tiada perbincangan diberikan. |
Poor discussion. Contained factual errors. Perbincangan yang lemah. Mengandungi kesilapan fakta. |
Basic / Minimal discussion with no example given and less convincing. Perbincangan yang asas / minimum dengan tiada sebarang contoh dan kurang menyakinkan.
|
Good discussions that are related to the scenario but it can be improved further. Adequate examples are given. Perbincangan yang baik dan berkaitan dengan senario tetapi ia boleh diperbaiki lagi. Contoh yang mencukupi telah diberikan. |
In depth discussion with excellent examples and very convincing points. The facts were coherent and clearly presented. Perbincangan yang mendalam dengan contoh-contoh yang sangat sesuai dengan poin-poin yang menyakinkan. Fakta-fakta yang jelas dan dipersembahkan juga dengan jelas. |
|
Discussion on how Facebook changes the way people share information |
Wrong / No discussion provided. Salah / Tiada perbincangan diberikan. |
Poor discussion. Contained factual errors. Perbincangan yang lemah. Mengandungi kesilapan fakta. |
Basic / Minimal discussion with no example given. Perbincangan yang asas / minimum dengan tiada sebarang contoh.
|
Good discussions that are related to the scenario but it can be improved further. Adequate examples are given. Perbincangan yang baik dan berkaitan dengan senario tetapi ia boleh diperbaiki lagi. Contoh yang mencukupi telah diberikan. |
In depth discussion with excellent examples. The facts were coherent and clearly presented. Perbincangan yang mendalam dengan contoh-contoh yang sangat sesuai. Fakta-fakta yang jelas dan dipersembahkan juga dengan jelas. |
|
Conclusion |
No conclusion given. Tiada kesimpulan yang diberikan. |
Summed up only a few issues in the assignment. Hanya meringkaskan beberapa isu dalam tugasan. |
Summed up many of the main issues in the assignment. Meringkaskan banyak isu utama dalam tugasan. |
Summed up most of the main issues in the assignment. Meringkaskan kebanyakan isu utama dalam tugasan. |
Summed up all the main issues in the assignment. Meringkaskan kesemua isu utama dalam tugasan. |
