milestone one

profileJambo
milestone_one__econom..rtf

ECO 620 Milestone One Guidelines and Rubric

Overview: The final project for this course is the creation of an econometrics analysis of a business, a policy, or an economic issue of your choice. The project is designed to guide you through the process of applying the key components of econometrics as introduced in this course.

Prompt: For this milestone, submit a paper on the research question, the literature review, and the data you will use for your final project. Specifically, the following critical elements must be addressed:

• Description

o What issue are you addressing? Why is your research question relevant?

o Identify the target audience(s) for your paper. Is each audience technical or nontechnical? For example, are they general readers, managers, or political decision makers? Why would your research be relevant for this audience?

• Literature Review

o What economic methods and techniques have been used to study this or a similar issue? How has the issue been addressed econometrically?

Were these methods and techniques the most appropriate for this study? Why or why not?

o What are the hypotheses you plan to test? How do they translate into empirical models?

• Data

o What data will you use in your empirical work? What is the source of your data? Why is this particular data set appropriate for the study?

o What type of data (summary statistics, scatter plots, etc.) was utilized in your study? What relationships can be gleaned by simple data screening? What are the implications of these relationships?

Guidelines for Submission: This submission should be two to three pages in length (in addition to the title page and references) and should use double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, one-inch margins, and citations in APA format.

Instructor Feedback: This activity uses an integrated rubric in Blackboard. Students can view instructor feedback in the Grade Center. For more information, review these instructions.

Rubric

Critical Elements

Exemplary (100)

Proficient (90)

Needs Improvement (70)

Not Evident (0)

Value

Description:

Meets "Proficient" criteria and

Outlines the issue in a clear

Outlines the issue and explains

Does not outline the issue or

10

Relevance

provides compelling examples to

manner, explaining how the topic

how the topic is relevant, but the

does not explain how the topic is

illustrate the relevance of the

is relevant to the study of

issue is vaguely defined or

relevant to the study of

issue

economics

explanation of why the issue is

economics

relevant to the study of

economics lacks in detail

Description:

Meets "Proficient" criteria and

Identifies the target audience(s),

Identifies the target audience(s)

Does not Identify the target

10

Target Audience(s)

provides implications that the

the associated level of expertise,

but fails to either identify the

audience(s)

choice of audience will have on

and why the research is relevant

level of expertise or why the

the structure of the paper

to each audience

research is relevant to each

audience

literature Review:

Meets "Proficient" criteria, and

Summarizes economic methods

Summarizes economic methods

Does not summarize economic

20

Methods and

summary is comprehensively

and techniques used and how

and techniques used and how

methods and techniques used or

Techniques

detailed

the methods were employed and

the methods were employed but

define how the methods were

evaluates the model's

does not evaluate the model's

employed

appropriateness

appropriateness, or the summary

does not adequately discuss the

main feature of the models

literature Review:

Meets "Proficient" criteria and

Clearly sets up testable

Sets up testable hypotheses but

Does not set up testable

15

Hypotheses

explains the translation by tying

hypotheses and explains how

does not explain how they

hypotheses

it back to the overall issue

they translate into empirical

translate into empirical models

models

Data: Source

Meets "Proficient" criteria and

Identifies the data and data

Identifies the data set but does

Does not identify the data set, or

20

discusses possible issues and

source to be used in the study

not provide background on the

the identified data set is not

biases in the data, based on the

and explains the appropriateness

data or does not explain the

usable

data source

of this data to this study

appropriateness of the data to

this study

Data: Relationships

Meets "Proficient" criteria and

Summarizes the data utilized in

Summarizes the data utilized in

Does not summarize the data

20

discusses what might be

the study, including the type of

the study, including the type of

utilized in the study

influencing the relationships

data, and details the

data, but does not detail the

observed and why these initial

relationships existing between

relationships existing between

findings might be misleading

main variables, as well as their

main variables or their

implications

implications

Articulation of

Submission is free of errors

Submission has no major errors

Submission has major errors

Submission has critical errors

5

Response

related to citations, grammar,

related to citations, grammar,

related to citations, grammar,

related to citations, grammar,

spelling, syntax, and organization

spelling, syntax, or organization

spelling, syntax, or organization

spelling, syntax, or organization

and is presented in a professional

that negatively impact readability

that prevent understanding of

and easy to read format

and articulation of main ideas

ideas

Earned Total

100