Respond to the following exercises from Chapter One of The Literature Review in 150 to 200 words each. For the Additional Question, record the research and null hypotheses for your project. Post References if used
· Exercise 1.1: Discovering the Subject of Your Interest or Issue of Inquiry
· Exercise 1.2: Understanding the Personal Viewpoint
· Exercise 1.3: Selecting the Focus of Your Study
· Exercise 1.5: Developing Your Interest Statement
Additional Question: What are your research and null hypotheses?
Chapter One
Step One: Select a Topic
Task 1. Choose a Research Interest
Most applied research begins by selecting an everyday problem,
interest, or concern for further study. Selecting an interest for study
needs great care and forethought. As the opening quote says: “Hoe
in haste, harvest in tears.” Selecting a suitable interest for research is
critical to the success of the project. This search begins with personal
reflection that uncovers an interest.
Research interests come mainly from the researcher’s curiosity.
Various professional and public settings provide the context for theseconcerns and present fruitful opportunities for the discovery of a formal
research topic. If one’s own introspection does not provide an
issue, other avenues are available. Topic suggestions can come from
experts knowledgeable in the academic disciplines or from those who
are skilled practitioners in the field. Perhaps reading various academic
and professional trade journals can uncover areas for further
research. Frequently, journal articles include suggestions for further
research. Tapping into media and professional association reports
about current issues will also uncover research alternatives. Also, the
current national, state, or local debates and initiatives concerning
your professional field can become research interests. Finally, you
can seek issues from your applied field.
Next, identify and use the scientific principles or theories of
your chosen area to address the issue. For example, what theories
in cognitive psychology speak to the developmental learning
abilities of students? What does sociological theory predict about
group behavior? How does cultural anthropological theory provide
an understanding about the culture of the work community?
The theoretical models in the various social sciences can always
provide new insights. In fact, there are many places to find
research interests. The following provides a summary of possible
Exercises
Throughout this text, you will find a series of exercises to help in
the various tasks of developing a literature review. The first four
exercises in this chapter employ free writes. A free write is spontaneous
writing done without reference to notes or outlines. Its purpose is
to explore what you have already internalized about a subject. These
exercises will lead you through the transformations using four free
writes. Each one appears at the end of this chapter’s subsections. The
subject statement for each exercise is followed by guiding questions.
Respond to each question by writing ideas as they occur to you.
Exercise 1.1
Discovering the Subject of Your Interest or Issue of Inquiry
1. What is your personal interest or issue?
2. What are the component parts of this interest?
3. Why did you become curious about this question?
Researcher Bias
Researchers often have personal attachments to, and views about,
their personal interests. Researchers have opinions about the problems
in their field and often have preferred answers to which they are committed.
These preconceptions, personal attachments, and points of
view present both strengths and weaknesses for the research effort.
Personal attachment to an interest provides the passion and dedication
necessary for conducting good research, which is a plus. Unfortunately,
personal attachment can also carry bias and opinion, causing researchers
to jump to premature conclusions. Rather than arriving at a conclusion
after methodical scholarly work, they succumb to bias. While
bias and opinion can never be removed completely, they must be
controlled.
How does a researcher control bias and opinion? First, careful
introspection can bring these personal views forward, where they
can be identified as what they are. By rationally identifying and
confronting these views, the researcher can control personal bias and
opinion, committing to being open-minded, skeptical, and considerate
of research data. If these attachments remain embedded and
unidentified, the research will be severely compromised. A researcher
hobbled by unchecked bias can only produce biased findings.
Exercise 1.2
Understanding the Personal Viewpoint
What previous knowledge do you have about your interest?
2. What personal experience do you have that influences you about this issue or interest?
3. What are your beliefs, biases, and opinions about this interest or issue?
4. What predisposes you to certain conclusions about the issue or concern of study?
5. How will you identify and isolate your personal bias, opinion, feelings, and intuition to preserve your neutral position as a researcher?
This exercise should have uncovered some demons. Demons are unavoidable, but must not be allowed to control or influence the research. They can, however, be a point of entry to the significance, the “why,” of the research. Put them to work when you explore the significance of the research.
Exercise 1.2
Understanding the Personal Viewpoint
Task 2. Refine a Research Interest
From a Personal Interest
Selecting a potential issue for research is just the first task in Step 1
(Select a Topic). Next is narrowing the selected interest down to a
clearly identifiable, significant, and researchable interest. Often
early considerations of a research interest are so broad that subject
specificity, focus, and vantage point are, at best, ill defined. What do
you actually want to study? Is it well defined? What focus will you
use to examine it? Where, from what angle or vantage point, can you
best conduct the research? There are many studies within each broad
interest that can provide important contributions; the trick is to settle
on one interest. Clearly define the potential research interest, its
specific focus, and its vantage point.
Activity 1. Specifying a Research Interest
Is your original interest clearly defined? The key to clearly defining
the topic depends on your ability to isolate the key ideas in the
statement of interest. These key ideas—those words and phases that
create the meaning of the interest statement—define the subject of
any research. Broad interests tend to be ambiguous and not suitable
for research. A hazy interest statement may also contain many inferences
that need definition. Precise definitions are necessary. The following
example demonstrates the problem.
An example of a research interest used earlier in this chapter was,
“To what degree do standardized test scores predict true student
achievement?” This question needs to be refined before it can produce
a usable topic for study. The broad scope and lack of a clear description
of key ideas demand more consideration to gain the specificity needed.
What are the key ideas? To identify them, look first for the subjects,
verbs, and objects in the sentences. In this interest statement, the subject
is “scores,” the verb is “do predict,” and the object is “achievement.”
These are the key ideas to be examined. When taking apart this first
interest statement, it quickly becomes clear that this subject is too broad.
What does degree mean? How can you measure it? What do these test
scores assess? What measurement is used? How accurate are the yardsticks
of measurement? What does the word predict mean? How can we
measure it? This interest needs to be more precisely defined.
Developing exact definitions for each of the key ideas that make
up the interest statement is any researcher’s first task. Definitions forkey terms must be exact in order to identify the subject of the
research. Without precise definitions, you will not be able to form
your topic. Once you have specified your subject, you need to decide
on a focus for your research.
Activity 2. Focusing the Interest
Focusing the interest means narrowing the study to one clearly
defined subject. If the subject is ambiguous, then the researcher cannot
identify the actual subject of the review. Often, broad interests contain
multiple subjects that could be studied. The previous example is one
such case. This interest could be studied from an individual, group, or
organizational perspective. For instance, the research perspective could
focus on the student, specifically individual student behavior, attitude,
skills, or knowledge. How can a change in student behavior affect performance
on an achievement test? How do student attitudes affect
performance in certain achievement assessments?
Alternatively, the research perspective could focus on group behavior.
How does a certain group respond to certain testing conditions?
What are the effects of this kind of test on group performance? From an
organizational viewpoint, a researcher might ask, “What effect does
providing pretest review time have on student achievement scores?”
After narrowing the focus of the broad interest, we see usable topics
such as, “To what degree are state standardized test scores in language
arts predictive of student success in college placement with regard to
Subject A exams?” or “How does teacher competency in test preparation
of students affect student achievement on a standardized test?”
Exercise 1.3
Selecting the Focus of Your Study
Remember to write out your answers in detail so that you end up with a useful reference page.
1. Clearly identify the focus of the study interest.
2. Are you looking at individuals, groups, or organizations?
3. Specifically name the individuals, groups, or organizations that you plan to study.
22——The Literature Review
The previous exercise probably produced many choices as possible
focuses for research. The next step is to narrow the interest and
choose one subject for study.
Activity 3. Selecting a Perspective
Once you have selected the focus of the subject, you need to
select the perspective or vantage point that is the place from which
you view the subject. What is your vantage point? Vantage point
depends on the choice of an academic discipline, which in turn usually
depends on the subject chosen for study and the particular perspective
from which the researcher has chosen to study it. What is
your unit of analysis? Are you studying individuals, groups, or
organizations/communities? The unit of analysis is important
because the social sciences are divided this way.
To illustrate this point, the researcher might study the tribal behavior
of groups and the effects this has on standardized testing and student
achievement. Perhaps the researcher might address the social interactions
that affect student achievement. Each of these possibilities anticipates
the need for a particular field of knowledge. If the subject is from
the individual student’s perspective, then psychology may provide the
best vantage point. If the subject focuses on a tribal perspective, then
cultural anthropology will provide the best vantage point. If the subject
is achievement from the perspective of group reactions and interactions,
then sociology will provide the best vantage point. Clearly
defined core ideas, and a specific focus and vantage point from which
to study, transform a broad personal interest to a researchable interest.
As with the focus, the researcher must narrow the vantage point.
You can anticipate many possibilities surfacing from the previous
exercise. Select the vantage point that will present the best viewpoint
for accessing data about the research interest.
Activity 4. Reflection: The Key to Interest Selection
The key to developing a successful research topic is the ability
to examine the personal interest, concern, or problem to study. The
more clarity and specificity brought to bear in defining the interest,
the easier it is to connect this interest to a researchable topic of study.
Experience with students choosing interests tells us that beginning
researchers sometimes neglect to take the time necessary for
reflecting on what they will actually study. Capturing an interest of
study haphazardly without considering intent, perspective, or vantage
point can produce awkward and unsatisfactory results. Therefore,
taking time to choose an interest for study carefully is critical for all
researchers. All of us wish to find a topic quickly, but haste will
produce awkward and unsatisfactory results.
Taking a personal interest and transforming it into a usable
researchable interest is much like the work of setting up a photograph.
Compare selecting a subject for research to photographing a
scene. Imagine yourself standing at Big Rock Campground in
Joshua Tree National Park. Around you are miles of desert with
shifting light and shadow. Perhaps there are also people, reptiles,
plants, or insects in your scene. Do you want a photo of an ancient
juniper tree, or do you want a picture of a family around a campfire?
What is the purpose of the photograph, and what is your goal? If
your goal is to record the entire park in seasons over time, you would
set yourself up for a lifetime’s work. Usually, though, your intent is
not to photograph the entire park or to study everything about your
subject from all perspectives. Rather, it is to select one worthy subject
of interest and to do it justice using your chosen perspective.
For both the photographer and the researcher, an initial interest
in the subject sparks the task. In both cases, we have a specific image
of the outcome that we expect to see. Also, in both cases, that early
expectation will, in all likelihood, be different from what actually
results. The selection of the subject of a photograph is just a starting
point. A satisfactory end product will appear only after much exploration
into focus, intent, and perspective, all of which will change as
you delve deeper into your subject. Perhaps the final photo will be substantially different from what you originally conceived it to be.
In both photography and research, it is necessary to be willing to see
what actually works and to continue down productive paths, while
being willing to abandon those paths that meander aimlessly without
leading you to satisfactory results. The first photograph may be of a
jagged rock. The photo you keep may be a close-up of the quartz
fragments in one section of metamorphic stone in that jagged rock.
Like the photographer, a researcher must have a subject of interest
that launches the inquiry, and must also craft and mold the
research. The researcher follows a path that works to define the
research interest rather than simply adhering to the original intent.
Evidence, whether of the eye or the mind, must lead the way.
EXERCISE 1.5
Developing Your Interest Statement
This exercise combines and patterns the information gathered from your free writes. Reflect on and analyze the written information produced by the earlier exercises, and develop a specific statement of interest.
Initially, this statement could be a single question or a declarative sentence.
Make it clear and concise. Develop a second statement that defines the significance of the research. Finally, write a statement that clearly defines beliefs, values, biases, and opinions, noting how you will neutralize them when following your research.
Using the information you have developed through your introspective work produced in Exercises 1.1 through 1.4, answer the following three questions.
1. What is your specific research interest?
a. The interest, issue, or concern of my research is (answer in seven sentences).
b. Cross out the two least important sentences without changing the key idea.
c. Cross out any words or phrases that can be removed without changing the meaning.
d. Reduce your remaining draft to three sentences.
e. Be sure your final three sentences identify the subject (What are you studying?), perspective (How are you looking at it?), and vantage point (What academic field will you use?).
What contributions to the field make this research important?
3. What are your beliefs, values, biases, and opinions?
a. How will these beliefs, values, biases, and opinions help you in conducting your research?
b. How will you prevent the tendencies contained in your personal viewpoint from affecting the necessary neutral stance of a researcher?
Now, using your answers for Questions 1 through 3, write a statement that clearly defines the interest for your research work, a statement that defines the significance of your research, and a statement that defines your personal tendencies and how you will control them. When completed, you will have a researchable interest.
Task 3. Use the Research Interest to
Identify a Preliminary Research Topic
do you translate a defined personal interest of study into a suitable
topic for formal research? Begin by reviewing your progress so
far.
Figure 1.1, introduced earlier in the chapter, shows the three
stages for refining a personal interest into a usable topic for research.
Reading from left to right, notice that in Task 1 you selected an interest
that you have identified as an important everyday problem needing
attention. If the interest definition is vague, you must clarify it
through specific definition. Next, continue to Task 2.
Introspection narrows the interest through the choice of a particular
subject, perspective, and vantage point. Choosing a vantage
point allows access to a defined academic field of study. Now,
address the final stage for selecting the preliminary topic of study,
which is the last concern of this chapter.
When addressing Task 3 of Figure 1.1, you leave personal
understanding, and focus on the shared knowledge of the academic
community. To accomplish this transition, the researcher needs to
translate the research interest into a preliminary topic for formal
research. As stated earlier in this chapter, the research interest
must align with the external concern and work of that academicinterest to a topic of study the academic community addresses, there
is no avenue by which to gain access and entry to the relevant academic
body of knowledge.
Some students believe that they have a well-defined study
interest topic and proceed directly into research. These students
complain that they have used the Internet and been to the library.
They are working hard at gathering information about their topic,
but can find nothing written on it. Rarely does a researcher stumble
onto a unique and previously unidentified topic of study. Previous
work has been done on almost all the interests we consider. So
what is the difficulty? Usually the difficulty is a lack of appropriate
academic terms. Students often try to use their everyday vocabulary
to access the specific language, vocabulary, and discourse of a
specialized field.
Word usage and meaning are particular to context. All academic
fields have an esoteric language to describe their subjects of study.
At its worst, the language deteriorates into jargon. The chances are
remote that a researcher’s use of everyday language conforms to the
technical language an academic field uses. The following example
shows the differences in the meaning of a term as used by different
academic disciplines.
Consider the word conflict. Informally, conflict is defined as a
disagreement or argument, or as an incompatibility of goals between
parties. As used in the discipline of history, conflict could mean a
war, as in an armed conflict. As used in organizational psychology,
conflict is an organizational breakdown of the standard mechanisms
of decision making. As used in social psychology, conflict is behavior
that occurs when two or more parties are in disagreement. As
used in personal psychology, conflict may refer to a person’s internal
struggle. As used in literature, conflict is whatever keeps a character
from achieving a goal. As you can see, each academic discipline
defines terms to meet its specific needs.
You must gain language skill in the academic field chosen and
become familiar with the phrasing that identifies the potential subject
of study. Once functionally skillful in the language used, you
will be able to navigate for subject definition and topic identification.
The researcher can then easily translate the key ideas that provide
definition for the subject of study. Three activities must be accomplished in order to complete Task 3
of Figure 1.1. They are (1) becoming familiar with the academic terminology,
(2) gaining entry into the discourse about the intended subject
of study, and (3) revising the initial interest statement (Figure 1.2).
The reference section of the library provides the necessary tools
to easily complete the jobs of Task 3. As you begin, refer to Figure 1.2.
For Activity 1, begin by consulting the subject area thesauri and dictionaries
to become familiar with the academic terminology that fits
your interest statement. Each of these references has a particular
purpose. The subject area thesaurus lists the various synonyms that
align to the keywords of your interest statement. When using this
reference, you may also find particular words that better define and
narrow your topic of study. The subject dictionary provides a different
reference point. Using the results of your thesaurus search, consult
the dictionary to determine if the definition of the terms you
selected fits your needs. It is important to note here that by querying
subject area dictionaries and thesauri, you access the language used
in the specific academic discipline of your topic. These referencesthe terms of the interest statement into a viable preliminary topic
statement, a statement aligned to your chosen academic field. Once
you have identified the correct terms that correspond to your interest,
you have completed Activity 1.
You are now ready to complete Activity 2. Using your newly
found terminology, consult the subject handbooks and encyclopedias
to access the academic discourse about your topic. Subject handbooks
discuss the theories relating to the topics of the academic field
and give you a great head start in determining the boundaries for your
literature search and creating an overview of the academic discourse
about your subject.
Handbooks can be organized in three ways. First, handbooks can
discuss theory as it evolves. This is done chronologically. A theory
is first discussed, and as it changes, the commentary evolves.
Second, theories can be organized topically. In this case, you would
find the research topic that aligns to your needs and review the section
for the appropriate discussion about that theory. Third, handbooks
are organized around current discussions in the field. This
type of handbook deals with the hot topics in the academic area and
emerging theoretical considerations.
Encyclopedias also provide great access to the academic discourse
on your subject. Because encyclopedias are organized in
alphabetical order, it is a simple task to find the theory and discussion
relating to your topic. Using the keywords and terms selected from
Activity 1, simply page to the reference point in the encyclopedia and
read on. The encyclopedic entry will begin with an overview of your
subject followed by a detailed discussion of relevant theory, and
finally will list the relevant contributors and authors for further study.
After consulting the appropriate encyclopedias and handbooks,
you now have translated the everyday language of your interest statement
into the terminology of your academic field. You also have an
overview of the topic and the relevant theory and discourse about your
topic. Finally, you have built a beginning list of the theories and contributing
authors to begin your literature search. Activity 2 is complete.
Just a word about where to find these important reference tools
in the library: when going to your university library, find the reference
section or reference stacks. They will be catalogued by academic
discipline. Knowing your vantage point, seek out the appropriate discipline and find the references that address your topic. Here are two basic options you can use when consulting the
library’s virtual portal. Go to the library website and do one of the following.
First, do a keyword search. This query will request three
pieces of information: (1) keyword; (2) the particular reference text
category; and (3) library location, which, in this case, is online. For
instance, if you are looking for dictionaries, you would type in keyword,
dictionaries, virtual online. This query will display all of the
reference dictionaries available online. Simply select the academic
discipline dictionaries appropriate to your vantage point, and you are
on your way. The second option can usually be found on the main
page of the virtual library portal. It is a subject “hot button” called
Library A–Z. When clicking this hot button, a new screen will appear
providing an alphabetical listing of all the resources in the virtual
library. Simply scroll down to the reference category you need, and
click it. All of those references will be displayed. Say you are looking
for handbooks. You would click Library A–Z on the main page of the
library portal. An alphabetical listing of the library resources will
appear. Scroll down to the H section of the listing, find Handbooks,
and click that entry. All of the handbooks available will appear, and
you can sort through them to determine the appropriate entries for
your review.
Using the new language and definitions you found when completing
Activities 1 and 2, refine your interest statement. Now it is
time to seek advice. Make an appointment with your university’s
research librarian. Your consultation can be done at your university
library or online as available. Discuss the details of the research
interest; be clear about your topic, your perspective, and your vantage
point (academic field). Describe your progress with your literature
review, and ask for tips and advice
Rules for Library Use
Before your first trip to the library, whether you are consulting
online resources (a virtual library) or an actual library, stop for a
minute, and review some important rules on library use. Heeding
these rules will save time and produce better results.
Rule 1. Know Your Librarian
The research librarian, whether online or in person, is a
friend, a guide, and a coach. When using a library for the firsttime, consult first with a research librarian. Make sure that
you have formed a positive relationship and can rely on the
librarian as coach, mentor, and confidant.
Rule 2. Be Purposeful
Have a clear purpose and plan when researching. Wandering
the stacks, exploring the subject catalog, or surfing websites
is entertaining, but it is not productive.
Every time you conduct research, know what you are looking
for and where to get it.
Have a strategy for research. Planning saves time. Know
what you want to do before you take your first step. What
types of information do you need, and where can it be found?
Are you scanning the subject catalogs to refine your topic?
Are you consulting the specific subject dictionaries to define
terms?
Have a schedule of work and specific outcomes for the outing.
Set goals and stick to them. Bricks and mortar and online
libraries present many temptations and distractions—a provocative
title that catches the eye, a new book from a favorite
author, an enticing reference link. You must be disciplined.
Honor your time, schedule your breaks, and focus on the task.
Finally, before you end a session, plan your next tasks. What
work must be done next? What is the time line? What new
resources do you need? Address these questions as part of a
debriefing with your written notes. Remember, we have short
memories. If you save writing notes for later, you invite ambiguity
and misdirection.
Rule 3. Remember That Preparation Equals Efficiency
Be prepared. Develop and organize your cataloging and documenting
tools before beginning a research session.
Use cataloging to codify the library materials you have
accessed in such a way that you can easily refer back to them,
and can properly identify them by the library indexing system
for further reference. Cataloging tools range from simple
three-by-five cards to research software tools. RefWorks is
available on most university websites, or you can purchase
software such as EndNote or Citation. Know that documentation tools are stores of notable information.
They can store notes about a subject, quotes and
abstracts, further references to explore, subject maps, or a list
of tasks to be completed next. Documentation tools contain
library data collected for study. These tools also have various
levels of sophistication, the simplest being a notebook or
notepad. The more complex and integrated ones are software
such as EndNote, Citation, Microsoft OneNote, ISO
Researchsoft Reference Manager, or RefWorks.
Take the time before you begin researching to build an organizational
system that fits your learning style and will aid you
through the entire literature review. Organizing now will save
much time and heartache later.
Task 4. Write the Preliminary
Research Topic Statement
Now you have the necessary information to complete Task 4—writing
the preliminary research topic statement. Using the new language and
definitions you found when completing Activities 1 and 2, rewrite
your interest statement. Review the reframed statement to determine
if it adequately addresses the intent of your interest. If so, you have
now constructed a preliminary topic statement for your study. If not,
rework and revise the study’s focus and vantage point, or search the
reference works further for other terms that would better suit your
interest. Use these options until you are satisfied that your preliminary
topic statement aligns with your original interest statement. Once
completed, Task 4 has been accomplished. You are now ready to begin
your search of the literature.
The following exercise will guide you through the task of transforming
the formal interest statement, written in Exercise 1.1, into a
preliminary topic of research. It has the following requirements:
Conducting a first conversation with a research librarian
Defining the key terms of the interest statement
Translating the key terms and core ideas of the interest
statement
Rewriting the interest statement into a preliminary topic
statement