Quantitative Assignment- (Statistics Assignment)

profileMr. Someone
quantitative_assignment-_statistics.xlsx

Saving-Spending

Up to 12 points
1. Researchers are interested in whether the percentage of savings for U.S. individuals is correlated
with their disposable income. They were able to obtain data from January 2000 through February 2015
They want to know if the more disposable income people have the more they will save.
A. Analyze the data to see if there is significant correlation between the two variables. Be sure you do the right tests
B. Identify the dependent and independent variables
C. Be sure to highlight the statistical results you used to make your decision and explain your results in words and numbers
D. Be sure to interpret the results in words and tie back to what the researchers want to know.
DATE % Saving Rate Disposable Income
2000-01-01 4.7 8,744.80
2000-02-01 4.2 8,778.70
2000-03-01 3.9 8,800.60
2000-04-01 4.4 8,836.90
2000-05-01 4.2 8,869.80
2000-06-01 4.2 8,890.20
2000-07-01 4.6 8,937.10
2000-08-01 4.6 8,985.20
2000-09-01 3.8 8,985.50
2000-10-01 4.0 9,000.00
2000-11-01 3.8 8,994.00
2000-12-01 3.5 9,004.60
2001-01-01 4.0 9,054.50
2001-02-01 4.1 9,073.00
2001-03-01 4.5 9,101.30
2001-04-01 4.3 9,080.80
2001-05-01 3.7 9,061.70
2001-06-01 3.7 9,062.40
2001-07-01 5.0 9,198.40
2001-08-01 6.1 9,359.00
2001-09-01 6.3 9,290.50
2001-10-01 2.7 9,145.70
2001-11-01 3.4 9,167.50
2001-12-01 3.8 9,190.30
2002-01-01 5.6 9,385.70
2002-02-01 5.3 9,395.50
2002-03-01 5.3 9,391.30
2002-04-01 5.1 9,417.90
2002-05-01 5.6 9,438.50
2002-06-01 5.4 9,459.00
2002-07-01 4.6 9,429.70
2002-08-01 4.4 9,422.00
2002-09-01 4.9 9,427.10
2002-10-01 4.7 9,448.30
2002-11-01 4.7 9,469.50
2002-12-01 4.5 9,497.00
2003-01-01 4.5 9,499.70
2003-02-01 4.7 9,480.20
2003-03-01 4.6 9,513.80
2003-04-01 4.6 9,575.10
2003-05-01 5.1 9,649.50
2003-06-01 4.9 9,682.20
2003-07-01 5.5 9,791.00
2003-08-01 5.3 9,851.70
2003-09-01 4.5 9,738.00
2003-10-01 4.6 9,779.60
2003-11-01 4.7 9,851.40
2003-12-01 4.8 9,868.10
2004-01-01 4.5 9,878.90
2004-02-01 4.5 9,899.70
2004-03-01 4.5 9,935.50
2004-04-01 4.7 9,968.10
2004-05-01 4.7 10,019.20
2004-06-01 5.0 10,019.50
2004-07-01 4.5 10,035.40
2004-08-01 4.6 10,064.70
2004-09-01 3.9 10,064.90
2004-10-01 3.8 10,074.00
2004-11-01 3.4 10,050.20
2004-12-01 6.3 10,417.50
2005-01-01 2.9 10,069.30
2005-02-01 2.7 10,073.50
2005-03-01 2.7 10,104.80
2005-04-01 2.1 10,124.50
2005-05-01 3.0 10,166.40
2005-06-01 2.2 10,195.80
2005-07-01 1.9 10,221.50
2005-08-01 2.4 10,236.90
2005-09-01 2.3 10,184.60
2005-10-01 2.6 10,233.70
2005-11-01 2.7 10,303.90
2005-12-01 2.8 10,358.70
2006-01-01 3.7 10,497.70
2006-02-01 3.8 10,542.50
2006-03-01 3.7 10,561.70
2006-04-01 3.4 10,548.20
2006-05-01 3.2 10,538.90
2006-06-01 3.4 10,562.30
2006-07-01 2.9 10,559.50
2006-08-01 3.0 10,557.60
2006-09-01 3.0 10,622.60
2006-10-01 3.1 10,683.80
2006-11-01 3.2 10,721.60
2006-12-01 3.0 10,749.60
2007-01-01 3.0 10,759.00
2007-02-01 3.3 10,787.10
2007-03-01 3.6 10,819.70
2007-04-01 3.2 10,817.20
2007-05-01 3.0 10,811.90
2007-06-01 2.8 10,799.50
2007-07-01 2.8 10,824.30
2007-08-01 2.6 10,830.80
2007-09-01 2.8 10,858.40
2007-10-01 2.8 10,838.60
2007-11-01 2.5 10,828.10
2007-12-01 3.0 10,874.10
2008-01-01 3.4 10,904.70
2008-02-01 3.9 10,923.90
2008-03-01 4.0 10,946.90
2008-04-01 3.5 10,906.10
2008-05-01 7.9 11,430.90
2008-06-01 5.6 11,129.10
2008-07-01 4.4 10,953.60
2008-08-01 3.7 10,865.90
2008-09-01 4.4 10,878.20
2008-10-01 5.4 10,932.30
2008-11-01 6.3 11,008.10
2008-12-01 6.5 10,968.40
2009-01-01 6.5 11,014.40
2009-02-01 5.9 10,915.30
2009-03-01 6.1 10,915.90
2009-04-01 6.7 10,975.70
2009-05-01 8.1 11,146.50
2009-06-01 6.7 10,957.30
2009-07-01 6.0 10,918.60
2009-08-01 4.9 10,891.60
2009-09-01 5.9 10,906.30
2009-10-01 5.4 10,861.60
2009-11-01 5.7 10,886.90
2009-12-01 5.7 10,924.70
2010-01-01 5.6 10,906.70
2010-02-01 5.2 10,887.50
2010-03-01 5.0 10,912.00
2010-04-01 5.6 10,993.20
2010-05-01 6.0 11,067.00
2010-06-01 5.9 11,071.30
2010-07-01 5.9 11,080.50
2010-08-01 5.8 11,114.70
2010-09-01 5.6 11,101.20
2010-10-01 5.4 11,128.30
2010-11-01 5.3 11,160.80
2010-12-01 5.9 11,239.00
2011-01-01 6.2 11,297.40
2011-02-01 6.4 11,329.00
2011-03-01 6.0 11,312.40
2011-04-01 5.9 11,282.80
2011-05-01 5.9 11,277.10
2011-06-01 6.1 11,325.80
2011-07-01 6.3 11,371.20
2011-08-01 6.2 11,363.50
2011-09-01 5.7 11,330.80
2011-10-01 5.5 11,340.80
2011-11-01 5.6 11,329.30
2011-12-01 6.4 11,416.00
2012-01-01 6.6 11,500.30
2012-02-01 6.7 11,562.50
2012-03-01 6.9 11,586.80
2012-04-01 7.0 11,609.40
2012-05-01 7.0 11,611.60
2012-06-01 7.1 11,627.60
2012-07-01 6.6 11,597.10
2012-08-01 6.4 11,576.60
2012-09-01 6.5 11,638.50
2012-10-01 7.1 11,709.10
2012-11-01 8.2 11,877.20
2012-12-01 10.5 12,214.10
2013-01-01 4.5 11,487.60
2013-02-01 4.7 11,543.50
2013-03-01 4.9 11,584.70
2013-04-01 5.1 11,612.50
2013-05-01 5.2 11,653.50
2013-06-01 5.3 11,675.10
2013-07-01 5.1 11,665.60
2013-08-01 5.3 11,709.30
2013-09-01 5.2 11,742.70
2013-10-01 4.7 11,713.00
2013-11-01 4.3 11,725.60
2013-12-01 4.1 11,696.60
2014-01-01 4.9 11,753.20
2014-02-01 5.0 11,811.50
2014-03-01 4.8 11,865.40
2014-04-01 5.0 11,879.50
2014-05-01 5.1 11,897.70
2014-06-01 5.1 11,923.80
2014-07-01 5.1 11,939.40
2014-08-01 4.7 11,981.70
2014-09-01 4.6 11,989.80
2014-10-01 4.5 12,017.70
2014-11-01 4.4 12,074.00
2014-12-01 4.9 12,139.30
2015-01-01 5.5 12,249.10
2015-02-01 5.8 12,278.10

on-line vs lecture

up to 15 points
2. One professor was interested in evaluating the overall performance of students in online sections
He wanted to know if students in an online section would do as well as students in a face-to-face section. So one semester
he has the same class but one class was delivered in an online format and one section was delivered face-to-face and it served as a control section
The grades of each section are listed below,
with 4.0 = A down to 0.0 = F.
A. Write out in words the Null and Alternative hypotheses for this situation
B. Create a histogram of each class using the bins below.
C. What is the correct statistical test to use - satistically determine if there is a difference between the delivery methods.
D. Perform the correct Test, highlight the result you use to interpret the test and report in words your conclusion about the hypothesis
E How do these results compare? Practically, what is happening in the classes?
On-line Lecture Bins
4.0 2.0 0.0
4.0 3.0 0.3
2.3 2.3 0.7
4.0 3.0 1.0
4.0 3.3 1.3
3.7 3.0 1.7
4.0 1.0 2.0
0.3 4.0 2.3
0.0 4.0 2.7
4.0 3.7 3.0
4.0 3.0 3.3
2.0 4.0 3.7
3.3 1.0 4.0
4.0 2.0
2.0 3.0
4.0 3.0
3.7 1.0
3.3 2.0
3.0 2.0
2.0 1.3
4.0 4.0
0.0 4.0
3.7 4.0
0.0 3.7
3.0 3.3
0.3 1.7
3.0 3.7
3.3 3.0
3.7 4.0
3.3 1.7
4.0 2.5
3.0 3.2
4.0 2.9
4.0 3.5
4.0 3.7
4.0 3.5
3.0 3.6
0.0 3.0
3.3 1.5
3.7 2.8
0.0
2.3
2.7
3.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
0.0
0.0
3.3
4.0

Defects & training

up to 15 points
3. A company was concerned about the increasing number of defects and went to their training staff and had them develop a training program
to reinforce the proper way to assemble the gearmotors. The training program was given to the first shift but not the second shift. You are given the defects per operator
The number of monthly defects per operator was taken foro the month before the training and the month after the training.
Statistics were gathered from the shift who was training as well as the shift that was not trained. Did the training significantly reduce the number of defects?
A. Write out the null and alternative hypotheses and interpret your results in terms of the hyptheses
B. Perform the correct statistical test
C. Highlight the result you use to interpret the test and report in words your conclusion about the hypothesis
In addition you are to make specific recommendations to the training staff with regard to the future of the training program they developed.
You are to be professional in what you report and recommend to the training staff.
There is a "trick" to this one -- think carefully before running the stats test -
First shift defects Second shift defects
Operator Before After Operator Before After
1 3 2 13 6 5
2 4 0 14 7 6
3 2 0 15 3 5
4 1 1 16 4 3
5 0 0 17 2 4
6 2 3 18 5 3
7 3 1 19 4 2
8 2 1 20 2 1
9 2 1 21 2 1
10 1 0 22 6 3
11 0 0 23 3 2
12 5 1 24 1 2

Season Tickets

up to 12 points
4. The general manager of a basketball team wants to know if there is a significant correlation between the number of.
season ticket sales and the percentage of games won.
A. Analyze the data to determine the correlation and to see if there is significant correlation between the two variables.
B. Identify the dependent and independent variables
C. Be sure to highlight the statistical results you used to make your decision
D. Write out your results in words
Year Sales
Season Tickets % Games Won
2002 4995 40
2003 8599 54
2004 8479 55
2005 8419 58
2006 10253 63
2007 12457 75
2008 13285 48
2009 14177 54
2010 15730 63
2011 15805 70

Sales Training

up to 10 points
5. A sales Force received some sales skill training. Are the before/after mean scores for salespeople's job performance
Statistically significant at the 0.05 level? The results from a sample of employees are as listed below.
The Salespeople were given a skills test before and after the training.
A. Write out the null and alternative hypotheses and interpret your results in terms of the hyptheses
B. What is the correct statistical Test to Use
C. Perform the correct Test, highlight the result you use to interpret the test and report in words your conclusion about the hypothesis
There is a "trick" to this one -- think carefully before running the stats test -
Performance Performance
Name Before After
Ed 4.84 5.43
Mark 5.24 5.51
Jason 5.37 5.42
Raj 3.69 4.50
Heidi 5.95 5.90
Donna 4.75 5.25
Rob 3.90 4.50
Kathy 4.00 5.00
Susie 4.67 4.50
Ron 4.95 4.40
Jen 4.00 5.95
Matt 3.75 3.50
Doug 3.85 4.00
Bob 5.00 4.10

washers

up to 11 points
6. A cell phone manufacturer receives washers from their supplier in boxes of 1000.
After running short of washers on the line, they wonder if they are receiving the
full quantities ordered. Forty-five boxes are weighed and counted, with results below.
A. What is the average number of washers per box?
B. What is the standard deviation and range on the number of washers per box?
C. Find the confidence interval on number of washers per box.
D. Can they statistically prove that they are being shorted washers?
Box Washers
1 969
2 994
3 983
4 1015
5 994
6 1030
7 980
8 996
9 1011
10 1014
11 964
12 999
13 986
14 1003
15 981
16 962
17 1000
18 1005
19 981
20 998
21 980
22 1007
23 990
24 969
25 993
26 994
27 986
28 988
29 1002
30 983
31 1001
32 973
33 1003
34 1003
35 984
36 990
37 985
38 990
39 991
40 983
41 992
42 990
43 996
44 991
45 994