ESL lesson plan

profilecassandra44
siop_lesson_plan_template_and_rubric.docx

Using SEI Strategies in a SIOP Lesson Plan Assignment and Rubric

Assignment Instructions:

Create a SIOP lesson plan that integrates students' reading levels, cultural background, language objectives, content objectives, and best instructional practices for ELLs, as well as authentic assessment for a grade level and content area of your choice.

Use the SIOP lesson plan template, located on the College of Education site in the Student Success Center, and the "Class Profile” to complete this assignment.

From the “Class Profile,” specify a grade-level of your students. Choose a performance objective from the ELA Common Core State Standards to create the content objective for your lesson.

Select the English language proficiency standards based on the needs of your students. Consider applicable language acquisition stages of development in designing your lesson plan.

Integrate the following:

1. Lesson Preparation

2. Building Background

3. Comprehensible Input

4. Strategies

5. Interaction

6. Practice & Application

7. Lesson Delivery

8. Review & Assessment

APA format

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin.

Submit this assignment to your instructor in LoudCloud at the end of this topic.

Standards/Competencies Assessed:

Standards and program competencies assessed in the benchmark assignment:

· InTASC: 3(f), 4(m)

· TESOL: 2.a

· COE Program Competencies:

· D 7, C 7.1: Candidate will integrate ELLs cultural values and beliefs in the context of teaching and learning. (TESOL 2.a; InTASC 3f, 4m)

Scoring Guide:

CRITERIA

%

Value

1: Unsatisfactory

2: Less Than Satisfactory

3: Satisfactory

4: Good

5: Excellent

CATEGORY

0%

65%

75%

85%

100%

Standards 

10%

No standards are mentioned in the lesson. Lesson is not aligned to standards.

Some standards selected are not adequate for class profile or are not referenced.

All standards selected are adequate for class profile and are referenced. Lesson is vaguely aligned to standards.  

All standards selected are adequate for class profile and are referenced. Lesson is aligned to standards.  

All standards selected are appropriate for class profile and are referenced. Lesson is clearly and accurately aligned to standards.  

Content and Language Objectives 

10%

Content and language objectives are missing. Content vocabulary is not addressed.

Missing either content or language objectives. Content and language objectives do not provide a clear sense of what students will know and be able to do as a result of the lesson. Objectives are unclear, or are unrelated to standards. Incomplete reference to vocabulary instruction.

Both language and content objectives are present, and most are aligned to standards. Stated language objectives provide a minimal sense of what students will be able to do as a result of the lesson. Adequate attention is provided to content vocabulary instruction.

Most objectives provide a path to what students will know and be able to do as a result of the lesson. Multiple strategies for addressing content vocabulary instruction are evident.

All objectives are aligned to standards. Extensive, well-planned focus on teaching and reviewing content vocabulary before, during, and after the lesson.

SIOP Model

20%

Fails to use the SIOP model. The lesson plan is missing many of the required components. The activities are missing, weak, or incomplete. Skills and activities are not grade-appropriate.

Uses the SIOP model though not all lesson plan components are addressed.

Uses the SIOP model. All lesson plan components are at least minimally addressed. The fluency skills and activities are differentiated.

Uses the SIOP model. All lesson plan components are fully addressed. The fluency skills and activities are differentiated and provide meaningful practice with familiar text.

Correctly uses the SIOP model. All lesson components are fully addressed. Uses exceptionally organized activities that create multiple, differentiated, and meaningful opportunities to practice.

SEI Strategies (Utilizes SEI Strategies listed in assignment.)

30%

SEI strategies are neither clearly identified nor addressed.

SEI strategies are present, but are vague and/or poorly developed.

SEI strategies are present, but are not fully developed.

All SEI strategies listed are appropriate for the class profile and are utilized in the lesson.

All SEI strategies are well-designed for the class profile students and are creatively interwoven into the learning experience.

Appropriateness

InTASC 3f, 4m

TESOL 2.a

COE 7.1

10%

Plan is not appropriate for the profile of students.

Plan vaguely integrates students’ diverse cultural backgrounds. Content, materials and strategies are intended for the class profile of students, but could be more fully developed.

Plan integrates students’ diverse cultural backgrounds. Content, materials and strategies are intended for the class profile of students, but could be more fully developed.

Plan integrates students’ diverse cultural backgrounds. Content, materials and strategies are designed for the class profile of students.

Plan clearly and realistically integrates students’ diverse cultural backgrounds. Content, materials and strategies are engaging and well-designed for the class profile of students.

Review and Assessment

10%

Assessment is not addressed.

Assessment is attempted, but lacks clarity or is not fully developed.

Assessment is adequate for content and class profile. All student objectives are measured.

Assessment is appropriate for content and class profile. All student objectives are clearly measured.

Assessment is well-designed and appropriate for content and class profile. All student objectives are clearly and creatively measured.

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, and language use)

10%

Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are employed.

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language and/or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.

Some mechanical errors or typos are present but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.

Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of effective sentence structures are utilized.

Prose is completely free of mechanical errors. A variety of effective sentence structures are utilized. Writing is engaging and practice related language is utilized.

© 2015. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved. Effective Date: July 2015 Page 4 of 4