|
CRITERIA
|
%
Value
|
1: Unsatisfactory
|
2: Less Than Satisfactory
|
3: Satisfactory
|
4: Good
|
5: Excellent
|
|
CATEGORY
|
|
0%
|
65%
|
75%
|
85%
|
100%
|
|
Standards
|
10%
|
No standards are mentioned in the lesson. Lesson is not aligned to standards.
|
Some standards selected are not adequate for class profile or are not referenced.
|
All standards selected are adequate for class profile and are referenced. Lesson is vaguely aligned to standards.
|
All standards selected are adequate for class profile and are referenced. Lesson is aligned to standards.
|
All standards selected are appropriate for class profile and are referenced. Lesson is clearly and accurately aligned to standards.
|
|
Content and Language Objectives
|
10%
|
Content and language objectives are missing. Content vocabulary is not addressed.
|
Missing either content or language objectives. Content and language objectives do not provide a clear sense of what students will know and be able to do as a result of the lesson. Objectives are unclear, or
are unrelated to standards. Incomplete reference to vocabulary instruction.
|
Both language and content objectives are present, and most are aligned to standards. Stated language objectives provide a minimal sense of what students will be able to do as a result of the lesson. Adequate attention is provided to content vocabulary instruction.
|
Most objectives provide a path to what students will know and be able to do as a result of the lesson. Multiple strategies for addressing content vocabulary instruction are evident.
|
All objectives are aligned to standards. Extensive, well-planned focus on teaching and reviewing content vocabulary before, during, and after the lesson.
|
|
SIOP Model
|
20%
|
Fails to use the SIOP model. The lesson plan is missing many of the required components. The activities are missing, weak, or incomplete. Skills and activities are not grade-appropriate.
|
Uses the SIOP model though not all lesson plan components are addressed.
|
Uses the SIOP model. All lesson plan components are at least minimally addressed. The fluency skills and activities are differentiated.
|
Uses the SIOP model. All lesson plan components are fully addressed. The fluency skills and activities are differentiated and provide meaningful practice with familiar text.
|
Correctly uses the SIOP model. All lesson components are fully addressed. Uses exceptionally organized activities that create multiple, differentiated, and meaningful opportunities to practice.
|
|
SEI Strategies (Utilizes SEI Strategies listed in assignment.)
|
30%
|
SEI strategies are neither clearly identified nor addressed.
|
SEI strategies are present, but are vague and/or poorly developed.
|
SEI strategies are present, but are not fully developed.
|
All SEI strategies listed are appropriate for the class profile and are utilized in the lesson.
|
All SEI strategies are well-designed for the class profile students and are creatively interwoven into the learning experience.
|
|
Appropriateness
InTASC 3f, 4m
TESOL 2.a
COE 7.1
|
10%
|
Plan is not appropriate for the profile of students.
|
Plan vaguely integrates students’ diverse cultural backgrounds. Content, materials and strategies are intended for the class profile of students, but could be more fully developed.
|
Plan integrates students’ diverse cultural backgrounds. Content, materials and strategies are intended for the class profile of students, but could be more fully developed.
|
Plan integrates students’ diverse cultural backgrounds. Content, materials and strategies are designed for the class profile of students.
|
Plan clearly and realistically integrates students’ diverse cultural backgrounds. Content, materials and strategies are engaging and well-designed for the class profile of students.
|
|
Review and Assessment
|
10%
|
Assessment is not addressed.
|
Assessment is attempted, but lacks clarity or is not fully developed.
|
Assessment is adequate for content and class profile. All student objectives are measured.
|
Assessment is appropriate for content and class profile. All student objectives are clearly measured.
|
Assessment is well-designed and appropriate for content and class profile. All student objectives are clearly and creatively measured.
|
|
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, and language use)
|
10%
|
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are employed.
|
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language and/or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.
|
Some mechanical errors or typos are present but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.
|
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of effective sentence structures are utilized.
|
Prose is completely free of mechanical errors. A variety of effective sentence structures are utilized. Writing is engaging and practice related language is utilized.
|