Investment Analysis and Portfolio Management
Jams with
Or
The Best Part of Wakin’ up
Has Got to be Good
FI561 Term Project
Christa Midcap
December 17, 2009
Executive Summary
The 2008 acquisition of the Folgers Coffee Company by the J.M. Smucker Company
was applauded when announced as it seemed a positive move for all involved. The
synergies and efficiencies created in this conglomerate merger provide higher
margins and profits for Smucker’s and also positive value for Folgers. Smucker’s
has added value to their firm by acquiring the top coffee maker at a positive net
present value of $1.5 billion. Smucker’s is well on its way to achieving dominance
in grocery stores’ center aisles.
The Players
The J.M. Smucker Company (SJM) has grown its Ohio-based fruit
spread business over the last hundred years into a top selling nationally known
brand. More recently, the company has grown very quickly as a result of food
industry acquisitions that have served to fulfill the company’s strategy to own and
market number one brands within respective categories. By doing so, Smucker’s
has steadily gained market share among food producers. In the years from 2002-
2005 which included some of their largest acquisitions, Smucker’s grew from a $1
billion company to an $8 billion dollar company with plants and operations across
the United States and Canada.
The Folgers Coffee Company was established over 150 years ago in
San Francisco and has become the number one selling retail coffee brand by sales
and volume. While part of the Procter & Gamble Company, Folgers’ market share
grew to nearly 40% of the packaged coffee market, but had begun to experience
dragging sales due to the growing popularity of the foodservice coffee shops.
The Goal
Smucker’s goal in acquiring Folgers is part of their long term strategy to promote
balanced growth of the company through increases in market share. The company
executes this strategy by buying companies they have strong synergies with and can
create efficiencies. The results have been sales growth, operating efficiencies and
the repurchase of shares which increases value of the firm. In the area of sales
growth, Smucker’s successfully increases sales by marketing, cross-brand
promotions and introducing new products.
Smucker’s expects total savings from synergies with Folgers to total $80 million.
Savings will come from the areas of administration, supply chain, warehouse and
distribution costs. Smucker’s and Folgers have the same marketing demographic,
people who prepare meals at home. Also, the sale and distribution of Folgers is
aligned with Smucker’s current sales model. Smucker’s anticipates more
innovation capabilities in formulation, processes, and packaging.
The financial impact of the acquisition will result in growing operating profit and
EBITDA margins and an increase in free cash flow. Folgers is a $1 billion company.
The addition of their high volume of sales will produce a nearly 50% increase in
revenue. Together with the predicted savings from COGS and SG&A of 4%,
Smucker’s hopes for an increase of 8 percentage points of operating profit margin.
Smucker’s will also be able to focus more attention on Folgers and make the
changes needed to boost growth for the coffee maker.
The Deal
In the summer of 2008 Smucker’s proposed to buy the Folgers Coffee Company from
Procter & Gamble, who had been looking to split off the popular coffee maker due to
sluggish growth prospects. By year end, Smucker’s came to an agreement with P&G
to acquire Folgers for a total of approximately $3.3 billion. The company offered
P&G shareholders about 1.6 shares of SJM for their P&G shares. Smucker’s issued
roughly 63 million shares and P&G shareholders owned 53.5% of the new company.
To increase value to their own shareholder’s Smucker’s agreed to pay a special
onetime cash dividend of $5 per share to existing shareholders indicating the
strength of the combined businesses. In addition to the tax free share exchange and
special dividend, Smucker’s agreed to take on $350 million in Folgers debt.
The New Company
Smucker’s with the addition of Folgers aims to be a low cost provider that is also
looking to differentiate itself in the market. They will achieve this through an
efficient distribution and better access to capital and buyers. What differentiates
them are their strong brands with a loyal customer base.
High volume drives this new company as they seek to add top selling, familiar
brands with a large presence in their respective markets. Cost and price are also
very important as Smucker’s strives for efficiencies and looks to improve the quality
or the perception of improved quality in all its brands in order to change
prices.
With the integration of Folgers, the product mix of Smucker’s was radically
transformed. The newly acquired company now contributes 42% of Smucker’s total
sales. Net sales increased 48% in fiscal year 2009 compared to FY2008. Net income
increased by more than 50%. Selling and administrative expenses decreased as a
percentage of net sales by 7%. Free cash flow from operations has also been boosted
causing a comfortable level of liquidity. Smucker’s appears to be achieving the
growth predicted before the merger in sales, profit and synergies.
Because of the success of the merger, each earnings release beats expectations and
this is reflected in the spike of the stock price and volume every three months.
Compared to the previous year, although earnings rose dramatically, EPS only
increased by 4% due the higher number of shares. More investors are taking notice
of the added value of the merged companies and SJM is gaining more attention as it
grows in market share.
SJM : NYSE
Industry: Food Products
The Added Value
The value added by Folgers consists of its incoming cash flows plus the value of the
assets that provide those cash flows over and above the costs incurred by Smucker’s
to acquire and integrate the company.
To approximate future cash flows, I took the average of the last 3 years’ EBITDA
and multiplied it by a growth rate of 6% which was the long term objective stated by
Smucker’s. These cash flows were discounted by using the cost assumed from the
Folgers debt plus a small premium to cover risk for a total required rate of return of
12%. Using these inputs yields a present value of the future cash flows of $5.9
billion.
The explicit cost to Smucker’s for the stock exchange and special dividend was
approximately $3 billion. The implicit costs were the assumed debt of $350 million
plus any opportunity costs sustained by combining the two companies and added
income tax and interest expense. I estimate the total costs to be about $4.4 billion.
The net present value to Smucker’s of acquiring Folgers is $1.5 billion.
The Happy Ending
In the end, Smucker’s gains one billion dollars of added value to the firm. Procter &
Gamble gains by divesting a company that no longer fit into their long term
strategy. Folgers also gains a partner who is willing and able to grow the firm to its
full potential. Smucker’s shareholders gain by steady, balanced growth. Everybody
wins.
The Calculation of NPV
PV =
PV = 331.25 + 313.50 + 296.71 + 4945.16
PV = $5,886,620
NPV = PV – Explicit Costs – Implicit Costs
NPV = 5.9B – 3B – 1.4B = $1.5 billion
Resources
All company financial data taken from Smucker’s annual
reports and investor presentations obtained at
www.smucker.com
Company information on Folgers and details on the merger
transaction gathered from SEC filings found on
www.sec.gov/edgar/searchedgar/webusers.htm
Analysis and stock chart found on www.cnbc.com