Politics - Yesterday, Today, and Tomorrow
Grading for this assignment will be based on answer quality, logic / organization of the paper, and language and writing skills, using the following rubric.
|
Points: 200 |
Assignment 1: Politics - Yesterday, Today, and Tomorrow |
||||
|
Criteria |
Unacceptable Below 60% F |
Meets Minimum Expectations 60-69% D |
Fair 70-79% C |
Proficient 80-89% B |
Exemplary 90-100% A |
|
1. Discuss either two (2) civil liberties or two (2) civil rights events (past or current) that influences social responsibility in the American people today. 25% |
Did not submit or incompletely discussed either two (2) civil liberties or two (2) civil rights events (past or current) that influences social responsibility in the American people today. |
Insufficiently discussed either two (2) civil liberties or two (2) civil rights events (past or current) that influences social responsibility in the American people today. |
Partially discussed either two (2) civil liberties or two (2) civil rights events (past or current) that influences social responsibility in the American people today. |
Satisfactorily discussed either two (2) civil liberties or two (2) civil rights events (past or current) that influences social responsibility in the American people today. |
Thoroughly discussed either two (2) civil liberties or two (2) civil rights events (past or current) that influences social responsibility in the American people today. |
|
2. Discuss two (2) media events (past or present) that has positively and negatively influenced public opinion of one government agency. Provide examples to support your answer. Weight: 25% |
Did not submit ordiscuss two (2) media events (past or present) that has positively and negatively influenced public opinion of one government agency. |
Insufficientlydiscussed two (2) media events (past or present) that has positively and negatively influenced public opinion of one government agency. |
Partiallydiscussed two (2) media events (past or present) that has positively and negatively influenced public opinion of one government agency. |
Satisfactorilydiscussed two (2) media events (past or present) that has positively and negatively influenced public opinion of one government agency. |
Thoroughlydiscussed two (2) media events (past or present) that has positively and negatively influenced public opinion of one government agency. |
|
3. Discuss two (2) differences between the Republican and Democratic parties that may have an ethical impact on the American people. Weight: 25% |
Did not submit or incompletely discussed two (2) differences between the Republican and Democratic parties that may have an ethical impact on the American people. |
Insufficiently discussed two (2) differences between the Republican and Democratic parties that may have an ethical impact on the American people. |
Partially discussed two (2) differences between the Republican and Democratic parties that may have an ethical impact on the American people. |
Satisfactorily discussed two (2) differences between the Republican and Democratic parties that may have an ethical impact on the American people. |
Thoroughly discussed two (2) differences between the Republican and Democratic parties that may have an ethical impact on the American people. |
|
4. Writing / Support for ideas (8%) |
Never uses reasons and evidence that logically support ideas |
Rarely uses reasons and evidence that logically support ideas |
Partially uses reasons and evidence that logically support ideas |
Mostly uses reasons and evidence that logically support ideas |
Consistently uses reasons and evidence that logically support ideas. |
|
5. Writing / Grammar and mechanics (5%) |
Serious and persistent errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation |
Numerous errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation |
Partially free of errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation |
Mostly free of errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation |
Free of errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation |
|
6. Writing and Information Literacy / Integration and Crediting of Sources (7%) |
Serious errors in the integration of sources, such as intentional or accidental plagiarism, or failure to use in-text citations. |
Sources are rarely integrated using effective techniques of quoting, paraphrasing, and summarizing, using in-text citations |
Sources are partially integrated using effective techniques of quoting, paraphrasing, and summarizing, using in-text citations |
Sources are mostly integrated using effective techniques of quoting, paraphrasing, and summarizing, using in-text citations |
Sources are consistently integrated using effective techniques of quoting, paraphrasing, and summarizing, using in-text citations |
|
7. Information Literacy / Research (5%) |
Quantity and/or quality of sources are unacceptable |
Too few references and/or references are of poor quality |
Number of sources is less than expected and/or the quality of sources is questionable. |
Number of sources is sufficient and the quality of sources is mostly good. |
Number of sources is sufficient and the quality of sources is good. |