Human Resource Questions

profilemihkano
selectionpt2-mgmt351-fall2015.pptx

SELECTION: PART TWO

October 12, 2015

Week 3

MGMT 351

Fall 2015

David Caughlin, Ph.D.

1

Outline

Resumes & References

Cognitive Ability Tests

Personality Inventories

Interviews

Work Samples

Drug Tests

Integrity Tests

Project Questions

2

Talent Flows

Staffing Processes

Supply-Chain Perspective

Potential Labor Pool

Labor Pool

Applicant Pool

Candidates for Further Evaluation

Offer Candidates

New Hires

Building & Planning

Recruiting

Screening

Selecting

Offering & Closing

Cascio & Boudreau (2010)

Talent Flows

Staffing Processes

Supply-Chain Perspective

Potential Labor Pool

Labor Pool

Applicant Pool

Candidates for Further Evaluation

Offer Candidates

New Hires

Building & Planning

Recruiting

Screening

Selecting

Offering & Closing

Cascio & Boudreau (2010)

Types of Selection Measures

A variety of selection measures are commonly used:

Resumes and references

Background checks and credit checks

Cognitive ability tests

Personality inventories

Interviews

Work samples

Drug tests

Integrity tests

Formats of Different Personnel Selection Tests

Individually Administered

Example: employment interview

VS.

Group Administered

Example: paper-and-pencil tests given to many applicants at once

Formats of Different Personnel Selection Tests

Speed Tests

require test-taker to work as quickly as possible and within a short period of time

VS.

Power Tests

allow test-taker to go at their own pace, with no consideration for how quickly an applicant can answer the questions

Formats of Different Personnel Selection Tests

Cognitive Tests

measure an applicant’s general or specific cognitive ability

VS.

Non-Cognitive Tests

include personality tests and other characteristics that are unrelated to cognitive skills

Formats of Different Personnel Selection Tests

Methods

VS.

Constructs

Employment interview

Assessment center

Paper-pencil test

Integrity

Cognitive ability

Conscientiousness

Methods vs. Constructs

Example of two retail companies using the same selection method but measuring different KSAOs (i.e., constructs):

SAME

DIFFERENT

Retail Sales Company A

KSAO Measured:

Job Knowledge

Retail Sales Company B

Selection Procedure: Interview for Job Applicants

KSAO Measured: Interpersonal Skills

Selection Procedure: Interview for Job Applicants

Quality Standards of Selection Measures

To be considered of high quality, selection measures should be:

Reliable

Valid

Generalizable

Useful

Legal

Resumes & References

12

Resumes

Used to assess necessary qualifications

Commonly used but a challenge for employers because of the large volume of resumes employers receive

Different applicants provide different information, which adds to the challenging nature of resumes

Lying on resumes is common

13

References

76% of employers use some kind of reference or background check to screen employees (SHRM, 2010)

Often used to verify information or to avoid applicants with “red flags”

Tend to biased in favor of the applicant

Can be difficult to get much information because former employer fears lawsuit

14

Resumes & References

Reliability High test-retest reliability (If someone makes two resumes, they are likely to be of similar quality)
Validity Low validity, mostly because: 1. Everybody exaggerates; no bad qualities 2. Only good people are asked to be a reference 3. References don’t want to be held accountable
Generalizability Low, because low validity, nothing to generalize to
Utility Cheap, but because low validity, low utility
Legality People who write letters may be charged with libel for writing negative references

Cognitive Ability Tests

16

Tests of Cognitive Abilities

General cognitive ability is one of the best predictors of performance across jobs, and is reasonably inexpensive to administer

The challenge, however, is that cognitive ability tests have been shown to have adverse impact against minority groups

General Cognitive Ability

Job Performance

Training Performance

r = .40

r = .55

Example: Cognitive Ability Item

Paper is to scissors as wood is to:

knife

saw

scissors

screwdriver

Example: Cognitive Ability Item

In the triangle below, angles A and C are each 45 degrees. What is the size of angle B?

30 degrees

45 degrees

90 degrees

There isn’t enough information

A

B

C

Cognitive Ability Tests

Examples: SAT, GRE, and GMAT

The most popular tested used by employers (including the NFL) is called the Wonderlic Personnel Test

20

Example: Wonderlic Personnel Test

50-item test that is administered in 12 minutes

Score of 20 = IQ of 100 (average)

Score of 10 = basic literacy

Assumes most candidates will not finish the test

Primarily measures verbal comprehension, followed by deduction and numerical fluency

Items arranged in order of difficulty

Example: Wonderlic Personnel Test

POSITION SCORE
Offensive tackles 26
Centers 25
Quarterbacks 24
Guards 23
Tight Ends 22
Safeties 19
Linebackers 19
Cornerbacks 18
Wide receivers 17
Running backs 16
POSITION SCORE
Chemist 31
Programmer 29
Journalist 26
Sales 24
Bank teller 22
Clerical worker 21
Security guard 17
Warehouse employee 15

Tests of Specific Cognitive Abilities

Generally are correlated with measures of general cognitive ability

Examples of specific cognitive abilities:

Mechanical ability

Clerical ability

Example: Mechanical Ability Item

If the smallest gear turns counterclockwise,

which way will the largest gear turn?

counterclockwise

clockwise

there isn’t enough information provided

Example: Clerical Ability Item

Please put a check in the blank between the letter/number strings that are the same:

325B78 _________ 325878

87t559 _________ 87t559

44rt57 _________ 44rt57

Cognitive Ability Tests

Reliability High test-retest and inter-item reliability
Validity Generally considered to be the best predictor of job performance, especially when jobs are complex and/or dynamic
Generalizability High - even though the validity is stronger for complex jobs, cognitive ability is still a strong predictor of job performance in less complex jobs
Utility High - low cost and wide application across diverse jobs in companies
Legality Often have wide adverse impact on race (this effect is decreasing over time), so have to prove that the test is valid to avoid legal issues

Personality Inventories

27

Discussion

For what purposes are organizations using personality inventories?

In selection, what value added might personality inventories provide over cognitive ability tests?

Applicants’ Personalities Put to the Test

Toddi Gutner

August 26, 2008

True or False: These Tests Can Tell if You Are Right for This Job

Melissa Korn

October 29, 2012

28

Personality Inventories

One of the most frequently administered personnel selection methods

The Big Five personality dimensions have been linked to a number of job performance outcomes

Openness to Experience

Conscientiousness

Extraversion

Agreeableness

Neuroticism

Big Five: Openness to Experience

Includes being interested in learning and culture

A predictor of success in training

Big Five: Conscientiousness

Includes dimensions such as achievement-orientation, detail-orientation, and dependability

Most consistent of the Big Five in predicting performance across all jobs

Big Five: Extraversion

Includes being sociable, assertive, and friendly

A good predictor of performance for sales and management jobs, and also relates to training performance

Extravert

Big Five: Agreeableness

Includes being compliant, kind, and sympathetic to others

Not a consistent predictor of job performance

Big Five: Neuroticism

Includes being anxious or easily upset

May only affect job performance if at high levels

Example: Conscientiousness Items

I am always prepared.

I pay attention to details.

I like order.

I follow a schedule.

I am exacting in my work.

Please use the rating scale below to describe how accurately each statement describes you. Describe yourself as you generally are now, not as you wish to be in the future. Describe yourself as you honestly see yourself, in relation to other people you know of the same sex as you are, and roughly your same age.

Very Inaccurate

Moderately Inaccurate

Neither Inaccurate nor Accurate

Moderately Accurate

Very Accurate

Source: International Personality Item Pool: A Scientific Collaboratory for the Development of Advanced Measures of Personality Traits and Other Individual Differences (http://ipip.ori.org/).

35

Issues with the Use of Personality Tests

Validity can be improved by providing an “at work” frame of reference to test takers

Concern with applicant faking on personality tests

Question regarding whether a simple linear relationship exists between personality and job performance

36

Personality Inventories

Reliability High test-retest and inter-item reliability
Validity Individually, only conscientiousness has moderate criterion-related validity. Other traits have moderate validity in certain job contexts. As a whole, personality is moderately-highly related to job performance
Generalizability Only conscientiousness generalized across most jobs
Utility Inexpensive, but only valuable for jobs where the traits are predictive
Legality Have to be careful when assessing stuff like emotional stability, which may violate clauses of the Americans with Disabilities Act. Also, have to be careful of adverse impact since genders and cultures often have their own personality norms

CASE STUDY

Our Hiring Manager Is an Algorithm

See handout and work in groups of 3-4.

END CASE STUDY

Interviews

41

Interviews

Most frequently used selection procedure, used by both small and large employers

In addition to determining whether an applicant has the needed KSAs, the interview allows the applicant to learn more about the organization and whether the job and organization fit their needs and interests (Dipboye et al., 2012)

Realistic job preview (RJP)

Unstructured vs. Structured Interviews

Unstructured

similar to a casual conversation, such that different applicants could be asked very different questions, some of which may not be job-related

VS.

Structured

job applicants are all asked the same job-related questions

often a better predictor of job performance than unstructured interviews

Structured Interviews

Two specific dominant types of structured interviews:

Situational Interview: asks hypothetical, job-related questions, with all job applicants being asked the same questions

Tends to measure job knowledge and cognitive ability

Behavioral Interview: asks job-related questions about a past experience that the applicant had

Tends to measure experience and some personality dimensions

Example: Structured Interviews

Job Situational Interview Item Behavioral Interview Item
Customer Service Specialist A customer calls who is angry about a defective product and begins yelling at you. What would you do? Describe a time that you had to deal with an angry customer who was yelling at you. What did you do?

Interview Structure

Ways in which structure can be added to the selection interview:

Use the same, job-related questions for all applicants

Develop standardized rating scales

Take detailed notes

Use the same set of interviewers for all candidates

Train raters

Discourage discussion of candidates between interviews

Legal Issues with Interviews

Structured interviews tend to lead to more positive litigation outcomes for employers

(Structured) interviews are relatively low in adverse impact

Interviews

Reliability Low when unstructured, moderate to high when structured
Validity Low when unstructured, moderate to high when structured
Generalizability Low when unstructured, moderate to high when structured
Utility Low when unstructured, moderate to high when structured
Legality The more structured an interview is (based on job analysis, ask everyone the same questions, etc...) the more likely it is to be deemed legal

Work Samples

49

Work Samples

Assess how well an applicant does the actual job

Straightforward in technical jobs:

Cook

Mechanic

Computer programmer

Accountant

More complicated with managerial jobs

Work Sample Tests

The most straightforward way to get a work sample is to give the applicant the equipment they would use on the job and let them actually use it

Advantages to work samples:

Have clear content validity

High psychological and physical fidelity

Disadvantages of work samples:

Can be expensive and time intensive

Should not be used to assess job skills that applicants are expected to learn later on the job

Work Samples

Reliability High
Validity Considered one of the best in terms of validity
Generalizability Most are job specific, and therefore, do not have high generalizability
Utility Very costly, but their high validity usually still makes them useful
Legality Very little legal issues; no evidence of adverse impact, usually high job-relatedness

Drug Tests

53

Drug Tests

Used by 67% of Fortune 1000, at $20 - $50 per person

Studies validating drug tests are rare

A study by the US Postal Service found (using predictive validation) that:

Applicants who failed a drug test went on to have 59% higher rate of absenteeism, and a 47% higher rate of involuntary turnover than those who passed

SPECIAL TOPIC

Recreational Marijuana Use & Oregon Employment Law

Summary of legal perspectives of two attorneys:

Matthew C. Ellis (represents employees)

Karen O’Connor (represents employers)

George Rede

June 30, 2015

56

Recreational Marijuana Use & Oregon Employment Law

Even though marijuana is legal recreationally, it doesn’t mean it can be used at work

Even with a medical marijuana card, employers can still drug test and fire an employee

Employer has the power to create a policy that employees can be fired for testing positive for marijuana

Employees can bring lawsuit if they perceive injustice and lack of a formal policy

Employer drug-test policy must be fair and applied consistently (even if just for specific types of jobs)

Recreational Marijuana Use & Oregon Employment Law

Still the case that employer can only drug-test after an employment offer is made and not before

Still a lack of scientifically valid test for marijuana impairment or intoxication

SPECIAL TOPIC

Drug Tests

Reliability High
Validity High at predicting certain job behaviors (absenteeism, accidents, etc...)
Generalizability High - Drugs are generally thought to be bad.
Utility Can be costly, but can reduce health-related costs
Legality May be challenged on invasion-of-privacy grounds

Integrity Tests

61

Integrity Tests

Developed to predict a number of negative and counterproductive employee behaviors, such as:

Theft

Malingering

Drug use

Aggression

Two main types of integrity tests:

Overt integrity tests

Personality-based (covert) integrity tests

Example: Overt vs. Covert Integrity Tests

Personality-Based (Covert) Integrity Test Items
I work quickly rather than paying attention to rules and details.
I look for excitement and thrills at work.
I prefer to get along with other people [reverse scored].
Overt Integrity Test Items
I would hit someone if they insulted me.
I have used marijuana while at work.
I would call in sick if I didn’t feel like coming to work that day.

Integrity Tests

Evidence generally supports the use of integrity tests for personnel selection (Ones et al., 1993)

Have relatively low adverse impact against ethnic minorities (Ones & Viswesvaran, 1998)

Integrity

Counterproductive Work Behaviors

r = .47

Dealing with Faking

Faking may or may not pose a problem in testing

Tell people not to fake

Add “lie scales” to detect fakers:

“I always practice what I preach”

“All of my habits are good and desirable ones”

Project Questions

66

Project Questions

What kinds of measures will you use for your 2 Ks, 2 Ss, 2 As, and 2 Os? Give a couple detailed samples of each (made up by you, not taken from the text or the notes). Explain why these are good measures. Be sure that your presentation clearly matches each KSAO with its specific measure

A year or so down the road, you’ll want to check the validity of your measures so you know whether to continue using them. Describe exactly what steps you will take to validate your set of measures. Does your strategy have drawbacks?

Project Questions

Based on your Planning & Recruitment strategies, what is your selection ratio likely to be (give a specific numerator and denominator). What does that say about your measures’ utility levels?

Outline

Resumes & References

Cognitive Ability Tests

Personality Inventories

Interviews

Work Samples

Drug Tests

Integrity Tests

Project Questions

69

SELECTION: PART TWO

October 12, 2015

Week 3

MGMT 351

Fall 2015

David Caughlin, Ph.D.

70