Final project/ Revision/feedback
Jambo
feedback_comments..docx
I need a serious revision, she gave me second chance of your work, which is I need serious work, I will pay the revision eco- 9-2 final projects (milestone I, II, II) and separate reflection paper and separate reflection paper
On this final projects.
Note: 1) you have revised the entire work of 9-2 final project according to the feedback or comments (milestone I, II, III)
2) Separate page you write a final reflection paper of 9-2 final project (Milestone I, II, and III)
Feedback from the instructor: If you want to resubmit it you can and I will grade your revision. The main problem was that you didn't identify a specific project (e.g., opening a restaurant, building a facility, developing a new drug) and evaluating that project in each of the milestones. Your analysis was more generic than specific. You are basically covering some of the topics that are part of a business plan, such as one an entrepreneur would submit to a bank. The business plan has to evaluate the specific business opportunity and your assessment of its ability to succeed. Here's a link to a website that discusses the fundamentals of business plans. https://www.sba.gov/category/navigation-structure/starting-managing-business/starting-business/how-write-business-plan
Feedback (1) from the instructor
I have a hard time following your analysis. You seem to switch from one product or industry to another rather than follow the same investment opportunity throughout the entire paper.
See my comments on it, below are the comments.
Feedback from the instructor
Page 3
do you think most investors involved in the derivatives market are willing to fund a new company designed to manufacture refrigerators? What about Angel investors or VCs? Is the possibility of a very high rate of return and the ability to sell the company at a large profit sufficient to attract that type of funding?
is the supply of these refrigerators limited now?
Page 5
what are the main cost components of building and selling these products? Are there specialized materials or subsystems? Can they be outsourced or should they be manufactured internally? Would production take place in the US or overseas? If the latter, are exchange rates moving in a direction that will add to costs or lower them?
Claire Starry - a day ago
Page 6
this goes in the demand section.
good point about the role of new communications technologies and strategies in marketing. How are they affecting the supply chain?
what market structure does this industry most follow? How many competitors are there producing similar products?
This is may help you the feedback I got.
Background12.6 (6.3%)
Levels of Achievement:
Exemplary 14 (7%) points
Meets “Proficient” criteria and includes economic concepts that enrich and extend the summary
Proficient 12.6 (6.3%) points
Provides a summary of an investment opportunity including company, product line, and proposed product specific to this opportunity that informs audience
Needs Improvement 9.8 (4.9%) points
Provides summary of an investment opportunity but with gaps in addressing critical aspects of company, product line, and proposed product specific to this opportunity that informs audience
Not Evident 0 (0%) points
Does not provide a summary of an investment opportunity
Feedback:
Demand12.6 (6.3%)
Levels of Achievement:
Exemplary 14 (7%) points
Meets “Proficient” criteria and qualifies evaluation with economic concepts that enrich and extend the evaluation
Proficient 12.6 (6.3%) points
Evaluates key non-price variables that are expected to support existing or potential demand specific to this opportunity using appropriate resources to support the evaluation
Needs Improvement 9.8 (4.9%) points
Evaluates key non-price variables that are expected to support existing or potential demand specific to this opportunity but with gaps in appropriate resources that support the claims made in the evaluation
Not Evident 0 (0%) points
Does not evaluate key non-price variables that are expected to support existing or potential demand specific to this opportunity
Feedback:
Costs12.6 (6.3%)
Levels of Achievement:
Exemplary 14 (7%) points
Meets “Proficient” criteria and qualifies with economic concepts that enrich and extend the claims
Proficient 12.6 (6.3%) points
Analysis of key non-price variables addresses how these aspects can be leveraged to improve upon organizational costs
Needs Improvement 9.8 (4.9%) points
Analyzes key non-price variables but with gaps in how these aspects can be leveraged to improve upon organizational costs
Not Evident 0 (0%) points
Does not analyze of key non-price variables
Feedback:
Constraints12.6 (6.3%)
Levels of Achievement:
Exemplary 14 (7%) points
Meets “Proficient” criteria and qualifies with economic concepts that enrich and extend the claims
Proficient 12.6 (6.3%) points
Analysis of constraints addresses how these aspects can be leveraged to improve upon organizational costs
Needs Improvement 9.8 (4.9%) points
Analyzes constraints but with gaps in how these aspects can be leveraged to improve upon organizational costs
Not Evident 0 (0%) points
Does not analyze constraints
Feedback:
Effects of Technology12.6 (6.3%)
Levels of Achievement:
Exemplary 14 (7%) points
Meets “Proficient” criteria and qualifies with economic concepts that enrich and extend the claims
Proficient 12.6 (6.3%) points
Assesses effects of potential technology for how these aspects can be leveraged to improve upon organizational costs
Needs Improvement 9.8 (4.9%) points
Assesses effects of potential technology but with gaps for how these aspects can be leveraged to improve upon organizational costs
Not Evident 0 (0%) points
Does not assess effects of potential technology
Feedback:
Market Competition9.8 (4.9%)
Levels of Achievement:
Exemplary 14 (7%) points
Meets “Proficient” criteria and qualifies with economic concepts that enrich and extend the claims
Proficient 12.6 (6.3%) points
Assesses market competition for impact on firm strategies and profitability
Needs Improvement 9.8 (4.9%) points
Assesses market competition but with gaps on their associated impact on firm strategies and profitability
Not Evident 0 (0%) points
Does not assess market competition
Feedback:
Firm Strategies9.8 (4.9%)
Levels of Achievement:
Exemplary 14 (7%) points
Meets “Proficient” criteria and qualifies with economic concepts that enrich and extend the claims
Proficient 12.6 (6.3%) points
Assesses potential firm price and non-price strategies for their relationship to the market structure
Needs Improvement 9.8 (4.9%) points
Assesses potential firm price and non-price strategies but aspects of their relationship to the market structure are unclear
Not Evident 0 (0%) points
Does not assess potential firm price and non-price strategies
Feedback:
Policies9.8 (4.9%)
Levels of Achievement:
Exemplary 14 (7%) points
Meets “Proficient” criteria and qualifies with economic concepts that enrich and extend the claims
Proficient 12.6 (6.3%) points
Identifies policies or regulations at the local, state, or national levels that may affect business explaining the reasoning for these policies
Needs Improvement 9.8 (4.9%) points
Identifies policies or regulations at the local, state, or national levels that may affect business but with gaps in explaining reasoning for these policies
Not Evident 0 (0%) points
Does not identify policies or regulations at the local, state, or national levels that may affect business
Feedback:
Effects of Interventions9.8 (4.9%)
Levels of Achievement:
Exemplary 14 (7%) points
Meets “Proficient” criteria and qualifies with economic concepts that enrich and extend the claims
Proficient 12.6 (6.3%) points
Describes the potential effects of the identified government policies or regulations on the firm’s goals and performance
Needs Improvement 9.8 (4.9%) points
Describes the potential effects of the identified government policies or regulations but with gaps on how aspects impact firm’s goals and performance
Not Evident 0 (0%) points
Does not describe the potential effects of the identified government policies or regulations on the firm’s goals and performance
Feedback:
Outlook: Risk9.8 (4.9%)
Levels of Achievement:
Exemplary 14 (7%) points
Meets “Proficient” criteria and qualifies with economic concepts that enrich and extend the claims
Proficient 12.6 (6.3%) points
Evaluates risks that would negatively impact the firm based on analysis
Needs Improvement 9.8 (4.9%) points
Explains risks but with gaps in evaluating how they would negatively impact the firm
Not Evident 0 (0%) points
Does not evaluate risks
Feedback:
Outlook: Opportunities9.8 (4.9%)
Levels of Achievement:
Exemplary 14 (7%) points
Meets “Proficient” criteria and qualifies with scholarly examples
Proficient 12.6 (6.3%) points
Explains opportunities that appeal to potential investors supported by factors that support these opportunities
Needs Improvement 9.8 (4.9%) points
Explains opportunities that appeal to potential investors but with gaps in addressing factors that support these opportunities
Not Evident 0 (0%) points
Does not explain opportunities
Feedback:
Outlook: Pricing Strategies12.6 (6.3%)
Levels of Achievement:
Exemplary 14 (7%) points
Meets “Proficient” criteria and qualifies with economic concepts that enrich and extend the claims
Proficient 12.6 (6.3%) points
Explains and analyzes pricing strategies that would improve firm profitability
Needs Improvement 9.8 (4.9%) points
Explains pricing strategy but with gaps in how aspects would improve firm profitability
Not Evident 0 (0%) points
Does not explain pricing strategies
Feedback:
Outlook: Implementation9.8 (4.9%)
Levels of Achievement:
Exemplary 14 (7%) points
Meets “Proficient” criteria and qualifies with economic concepts that enrich and extend the claims
Proficient 12.6 (6.3%) points
Explains how the recommended pricing strategies can be effectively implemented based on market conditions
Needs Improvement 9.8 (4.9%) points
Explains how the recommended pricing strategies but with gaps in how they can be effectively implemented based on market conditions
Not Evident 0 (0%) points
Does not explain recommended pricing strategies
Feedback:
Outlook: Government Interventions12.6 (6.3%)
Levels of Achievement:
Exemplary 14 (7%) points
Meets “Proficient” criteria and qualifies with economic concepts that enrich and extend the claims
Proficient 12.6 (6.3%) points
Explains how the new venture can leverage government policy to maximize profitability
Needs Improvement 9.8 (4.9%) points
Explains how the new venture can leverage government policy but it is unclear how aspects would maximize profitability
Not Evident 0 (0%) points
Does not explain how the new venture can leverage government policy
Feedback:
Articulation of Response4 (2%)
Levels of Achievement:
Exemplary 4 (2%) points
Submission is free of errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, and organization and is presented in a professional and easy to read format
Proficient 3.6 (1.8%) points
Submission has no major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization
Needs Improvement 2.8 (1.4%) points
Submission has major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that negatively impact readability and articulation of main ideas
Not Evident 0 (0%) points
Submission has critical errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that prevent understanding of ideas
Feedback:
Raw Total: 160.80 (of 200.0)
Feedback to Learner
0.0630000
12.6 <span class
0.0700000
0.0490000
0.0200000
4 <span class='ra
0.0180000
3.6 <span class=
0.0140000
9.8 <span class=
2.8 <span class=
0.0000000
0 <span class='ra
0.0630000
0 <span class='ra
0.0700000
0.0700000
14 <span class='
