Eco case study two revision.

Exemplary

Proficient

Needs Improvement

Not Evident

Section 1 

Points:

16.5 (15%)

Submission meets “Proficient” and extends with compelling analysis to enhance price recommendations in each part of the answer

Points:

14.85 (13.5%)

Analyzes the demand curve faced by the monopolist and provides price recommendations using algebra, the Excel spreadsheet data, and the graphing function to complete each part of the answer

Points:

11.55 (10.5%)

Attempts to analyze the demand curve faced by the monopolist and provides price recommendations using algebra, the Excel spreadsheet data, and the graphing function to complete each part of the answer, yet two or more of the answers are incorrect

Points:

0 (0%)

There is no analysis or no primary or secondary data source identified that could be used correctly used in the explanation

Section 2 

Points:

16.5 (15%)

Submission meets “Proficient” and extends the analysis of demand in a separate market in each part of the answer

Points:

14.85 (13.5%)

Analyzes demand in a separate market using algebra, the Excel spreadsheet data, and the graphing function to complete each part of the answer

Points:

11.55 (10.5%)

Attempts to present an analysis on separate market using algebra, the Excel spreadsheet data, and the graphing function, yet at least one primary or secondary data source is identified, but no source is used correctly

Points:

0 (0%)

There is no analysis or no primary or secondary data source identified that could be used correctly used in the explanation

Section 3 

Points:

16.5 (15%)

Submission meets “Proficient” and extends the explanation on the total revenue earned in both markets

Points:

14.85 (13.5%)

Correctly computes the total revenue earned in both markets and then makes rational recommendations on whether or not the firm will spend the $110 to produce the coins for sale

Points:

11.55 (10.5%)

Attempts to compute the total revenue earned in both markets and then tries to make rational recommendations on whether or not the firm will spend the $110 to produce the coins for sale, yet at least one primary or secondary data source is identified, but no source is used correctly

Points:

0 (0%)

There is no analysis or no primary or secondary data source identified that could be used correctly used in the explanation

Section 4 

Points:

16.5 (15%)

Submission meets “Proficient” and extends analysis of the combined demand information by using the Excel spreadsheet to supply correct data that identifies profit-maximizing price and quantity

Points:

14.85 (13.5%)

Analyze the combined demand information by using the Excel spreadsheet to supply correct data that identifies profit-maximizing price and quantity

Points:

11.55 (10.5%)

Attempts to analyze the combined demand information, yet at least one primary or secondary data source is identified, but no source is used correctly

Points:

0 (0%)

There is no analysis or no primary or secondary data source identified that could be used correctly used in the explanation

Section 5 

Points:

44 (40%)

Submission meets “Proficient” and extends explanation to include additional reasons for consumer surplus relevance to price discrimination in separated markets

Points:

39.6 (36%)

Analyze consumer surplus in separated market and consumer surplus relevance to price discrimination on the buyers in the high price market with the use of algebra and the Excel spreadsheet data

Points:

30.8 (28%)

Attempts to explain consumer surplus in separated market and consumer surplus relevance to price discrimination on the buyers in the high price market, yet at least one primary or secondary data source is identified, but no source is used correctly

Points:

0 (0%)

There is no analysis or no primary or secondary data source identified that could be used correctly used in the explanation