Assignment 2: Project Paper – Comparative Essay

assignment_2_rubic.docx

Home >History homework help >Assignment 2: Project Paper – Comparative Essay

Grading for this assignment will be based on answer quality, logic / organization of the paper, and language and writing skills, using the following rubric.

Points: 200	Assignment 2: Project Paper – Comparative Essay
Criteria	Unacceptable Below 60% F	Meets Minimum Expectations 60-69% D	Fair 70-79% C	Proficient 80-89% B	Exemplary 90-100% A
1. The level to which the instructions were followed. Weight: 15%	Did not submit or incompletely followed instructions.	Insufficiently followed instructions.	Partially followed instructions.	Satisfactorily followed instructions.	Thoroughly followed instructions.
2. The establishment of a clear thesis and the extent to which all parts in the topic were addressed. Weight: 20%	Did not submit or incompletely established a thesis or address all parts in the topic.	Insufficiently established a thesis or addressed all parts in the topic.	Partially established a thesis and addressed all parts in the topic.	Satisfactorily established a clear thesis and addressed all parts in the topic.	Thoroughly established a clear thesis and addressed all parts in the topic.
3. The adequacy of information, specific examples, and details which support the general thesis. Weight: 20%	Did not submit or incompletely provided adequate information, specific examples, and details which support the general claim or main idea.	Insufficiently provided adequate information, specific examples, and details which support the general claim or main idea.	Partially provided adequate information, specific examples, and details which support the general claim or main idea.	Satisfactorily provided information, specific examples, and details which support the general claim or main idea.	Thoroughly provided information, specific examples, and details which support the general claim or main idea.
4. The coherent organization of the points of comparison and the paper overall, with relevant content and persuasive presentation. Weight: 20%	Did not submit or incompletely provided coherent organization of the points of comparison and the paper overall, with relevant content and persuasive presentation.	Insufficiently provided coherent organization of the points of comparison and the paper overall, with relevant content and persuasive presentation.	Partially provided coherent organization of the points of comparison and the paper overall, with relevant content and persuasive presentation.	Satisfactorily provided coherent organization of the points of comparison and the paper overall, with relevant content and persuasive presentation.	Thoroughlyprovided coherent organization of the points of comparison and the paper overall, with very relevant content and persuasive presentation.
5. 3 references minimum number and quality Weight: 5%	No references provided	Does not meet the required number of references; all references poor quality choices.	Does not meet the required number of references; some references poor quality choices.	Meets number of required references; all references high quality choices.	Exceeds number of required references; all references high quality choices.
6. Clarity, writing mechanics, referencing, and APA formatting requirements, including a reference list and matching in-text citations. Weight: 20%	More than 8 errors present and problems of clarity and mechanics and proper APA formatting.	7-8 errors present and some problems of clarity and mechanics and proper APA formatting.	5-6 errors present and few problems of clarity and mechanics and proper APA formatting.	3-4 errors present but generally good clarity and good mechanics and APA formatting.	0-2 errors present and excellent clarity and mechanics and APA formatting.

Assignment

Project

Pape

–

Comparative

Essay

Grading for this assignment will be based on answer quality, logic / organization of

the paper, and language and writing skills, using the following rubric.

Points: 200

Assignment 2:

Project Paper

–

Comparative Essay

Criteria

Unacceptable

Below 60% F

Meets

Minimum

Expectations

69% D

Fair

79% C

Proficient

89% B

Exemplary

100% A

1. The level

to which the

instructions

were

followed.

Weight: 15%

Did not submit

incompletely

followed

instructions.

Insufficiently

followed

instructions.

Partially followed

instructions.

Satisfactorily

followed

instructions.

Thoroughly

followed

instructions.

2. The

establishment

of a clear

thesis and the

extent to

hich all

parts in the

topic were

addressed.

Weight: 20%

Did not submit

incompletely

established a

thesis

address all

parts in the

topic.

Insufficiently

established a

thesis or

addressed all

parts in the

topic.

Partially

established a

thesis and

addr

essed all parts

in the topic.

Satisfactorily

established a

clear thesis

and

addressed all

parts in the

topic.

Thoroughly

established a clear

thesis and addressed

all parts in the topic.

3. The

adequacy of

information,

specific

examples,

and details

which

support the

general

thesis.

Weight: 20%

Did not submit

incompletely

provided

adequate

information,

specific

examples, and

details which

support the

general claim

or main idea.

Insufficiently

provided

adequate

information,

specific

examples, and

details

which

support the

general claim

or main idea.

Partially provided

adequate

information,

specific

examples,

and details which

support the

general claim or

main idea.

Satisfactorily

provided

information,

specific

examples,

and details

which

support the

gene

ral

claim or

main idea.

Thoroughly

provided

information,

specific examples,

and details which

support the general

claim or main idea.

4. The

coherent

Did not submit

Insufficiently

provided

Partially provided

coherent

Satisfactorily

provided

Thoroughlyprovided

coherent

Assignment 2: Project Paper – Comparative Essay

Grading for this assignment will be based on answer quality, logic / organization of

the paper, and language and writing skills, using the following rubric.

Points: 200

Assignment 2: Project Paper – Comparative Essay

Criteria

Unacceptable

Below 60% F

Meets

Minimum

Expectations

60-69% D

Fair

70-79% C

Proficient

80-89% B

Exemplary

90-100% A

1. The level

to which the

instructions

were

followed.

Weight: 15%

Did not submit

incompletely

followed

instructions.

Insufficiently

followed

instructions.

Partially followed

instructions.

Satisfactorily

followed

instructions.

Thoroughly

followed

instructions.

2. The

establishment

of a clear

thesis and the

extent to

which all

parts in the

topic were

addressed.

Weight: 20%

Did not submit

incompletely

established a

thesis

or address all

parts in the

topic.

Insufficiently

established a

thesis or

addressed all

parts in the

topic.

Partially

established a

thesis and

addressed all parts

in the topic.

Satisfactorily

established a

clear thesis

and

addressed all

parts in the

topic.

Thoroughly

established a clear

thesis and addressed

all parts in the topic.

3. The

adequacy of

information,

specific

examples,

and details

which

support the

general

thesis.

Weight: 20%

Did not submit

incompletely

provided

adequate

information,

specific

examples, and

details which

support the

general claim

or main idea.

Insufficiently

provided

adequate

information,

specific

examples, and

details which

support the

general claim

or main idea.

Partially provided

adequate

information,

specific examples,

and details which

support the

general claim or

main idea.

Satisfactorily

provided

information,

specific

examples,

and details

which

support the

general

claim or

main idea.

Thoroughly

provided

information,

specific examples,

and details which

support the general

claim or main idea.

4. The

coherent

Did not submit

Insufficiently

provided

Partially provided

coherent

Satisfactorily

provided

Thoroughlyprovided

coherent