Processor architecture and instruction set / Instruction type and format

I:\notesD8757E\Team Project Rubric.xlsx

F D C B A Criterion Unacceptable Minimum Satisfactory Accomplished Exemplary Weight Division of Labor

Tasks are not defined

Tasks are vaguely defined, and the

workload is mainly assigned to few

members participated

Tasks are clearly defined and assigned to all the

members

All members take an active role. Tasks are

well defined by the group and fairly assigned to all

members.

Tasks are well defined and the leader follows up on tasks. Members assist other members who need assistance.

10

Score 0 6 7 8 10 Contribution Only one or two

members make a significant

contribution

Only few members make a significant

contribution

Most of the team member makes a

significant contribution

Each team member makes a significant

contribution

Team members work together to complete uncompleted tasks.

20

Score 0 12 14 16 20 Project Milestone

No project milestone is established

The project milestones are not realistic and the group progress is poorly

documented

Milestones are clearly established and the

group progress for each milestone is documented

Realistic and prioritized milestones are

established. The group progress for each milestone is well

documented

Milestones are met on time and are completed

within guidelines.

15

Score 0 9 10 12 15 Meeting Regularly

No evidence or documentation for group communication/ discussion

Group communication/ discussion is minimal

Regular group communication /discussion

Regular and frequent group communication /discussion

Communication is fluid and frequent, no members "fall off."

10 Score 0 6 7 8 10 Writing Quality The writing is

incoherent, broken, overly

long, and contains many spelling or

grammatical errors

The writing is incoherent, lengthy, and

has some spelling or grammar errors

The writing is coherent, and only has minimal spelling or grammar

errors

The writing is coherent, concise, free of spelling

errors and grammatically correct

There are no spell or grammar errors, and the writing is stylish

and designed to meet the intended audience.

10 Score 0 6 7 8 10

Rubric for Team Project

I:\notesD8757E\Team Project Rubric.xlsx

Content

Central purpose or argument is not clearly identified. No analysis is provided.

Information supports a central purpose or argument at times. Analysis is vague or too general.

Information provides reasonable support for a central purpose or argument most of the time but is not able to display evidence of a basic analysis of the significance of the topic.

Information provides reasonable support for a central purpose all the time or argument and displays evidence of a basic analysis of a significant topic

Balanced presentation of relevant and legitimate information that clearly supports a central purpose or argument and displays evidence of a thoughtful, in-depth analysis of a significant topic.

25

Score 0 15 17 20 25

Creativity

The presentation lacks any evidence of creativity or flair; materials might be straight from the resources or text. There is no multimedia.

Minimal creativity-- some different backgrounds, fonts or basic clip art is used. There is minimal personalization.

Presentation shows some creativity or personalization, there are images (clipart or photos) included or built- in sounds.

Presentation clearly shows creative endeavor, including use of images or sounds. Some personalization is evident

Presentation shows a great deal of creativity; multimedia including images, sounds, or videos are incorporated, as well as clear evidence of personal flair.

10

Score 0 6 7 8 10