need
Must be original
You will write a 5–7-page research-oriented paper in current APA format. Your research paper must have a title page which must not be numbered and does not count toward the total page count of the paper. A complete bibliography using a proper alphabetical format must be at the end of the paper. The paper must include at least 5–7 references, in addition to the class textbooks and the Bible.
Research Paper Topic
Disclosing Officer Untruthfulness to the Defense: Is a Liar’s Squad Coming to Your Town?
Since 1963, a series of United States Supreme Court case decisions have clarified that, in criminal cases, prosecutors must disclose to the defense evidence favorable to the defendant. This includes information that may be used to impeach the credibility of government witnesses, including law enforcement officers. These decisions mean that police officers who have documented histories of lying in official matters are liabilities to their agencies, and these histories may render them unable to testify credibly.
Would you terminate this 15-year veteran with a virtually clean record? Why?
Or would you impose significant disciplinary action as opposed to termination? Why?
As part of this research paper, read the following United States Supreme Court Cases:
· Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963)
· Giglio v. United States, 405 U. S. 150 (1972)
· United States v. Agurs, 427 U. S. 97 (1976)
· Kyles v. Whitley, 514 U. S. 419 (1995)
· United States v. Bagley, 473 U. S. 667 (1985)
Must be original
You will write a 5
–
7
-
p
age research
-
oriented paper in current
APA
format.
Your
research paper
must have a title page which
must
not be numbered and
does not count toward
the total page
count of the paper.
A complete bibliography usi
ng a proper
alphabetical format
must be at the
end of the paper.
Th
e paper must include at least 5
–
7 references,
in addition to the class
textbooks and the Bible.
R
ESEARCH
P
APER
T
OPIC
Disclosing Officer Untruthfulness to the Defense: Is a Liar
’
s Squad Co
ming to Your Town?
Since 1963, a series of United States Supreme Court case decisions have clarified that
,
in
criminal cases, prosecutors must disclose to the defense evidence favorable to the defendant.
This includes information that may be used to impea
ch the credibility of government witnesses,
including law enforcement officers. These decisions mean that police officers who have
documented histories of lying in official matters are liabilities to their agencies, and these
histories may render them unab
le to testify credibly.
With this in mind, you are the Chief of Police of a municipality. Your Deputy Chief of Police
advises you that one of your officers was investigated for inappropriate use of one of the
computers in the patrol division. As a result
of this internal investigation, it was determined that
the officer used this computer to search pornographic web sites. When confronted with this
allegation, the officer denied any knowledge of this incident. Upon further investigation, the
computer crime
s analyst determined that the officer’s log on password was used to enter the
unauthorized web sites. The officer then admitted to his wrongdoing and stated it would never
happen again. This officer has been with your organization for 15 years, and the onl
y other
disciplinary action taken against him was for being involved in an at
-
fault traffic accident 10
years ago. As the Chief of Police, how would you handle this situation?
Would
you terminate this
15
-
year veteran with a virtually clean record? Why?
Or
would
you impose significant disciplinary action as opposed to termination? Why?
As part of this research
paper
, read the following United States Supreme Court Cases:
·
Brady v. Maryland
, 373 U.S. 83 (1963)
·
Giglio v. United States
, 405 U. S. 150 (1972)
·
Un
ited States v. Agurs
, 427 U. S. 97 (1976)
·
Kyles v. Whitley
, 514 U. S. 419 (1995)
·
United States v. Bagley
, 473 U. S. 667 (1985)
Must be original
You will write a 5–7-page research-oriented paper in current APA format. Your research paper
must have a title page which must not be numbered and does not count toward the total page
count of the paper. A complete bibliography using a proper alphabetical format must be at the
end of the paper. The paper must include at least 5–7 references, in addition to the class
textbooks and the Bible.
RESEARCH PAPER TOPIC
Disclosing Officer Untruthfulness to the Defense: Is a Liar’s Squad Coming to Your Town?
Since 1963, a series of United States Supreme Court case decisions have clarified that, in
criminal cases, prosecutors must disclose to the defense evidence favorable to the defendant.
This includes information that may be used to impeach the credibility of government witnesses,
including law enforcement officers. These decisions mean that police officers who have
documented histories of lying in official matters are liabilities to their agencies, and these
histories may render them unable to testify credibly.
With this in mind, you are the Chief of Police of a municipality. Your Deputy Chief of Police
advises you that one of your officers was investigated for inappropriate use of one of the
computers in the patrol division. As a result of this internal investigation, it was determined that
the officer used this computer to search pornographic web sites. When confronted with this
allegation, the officer denied any knowledge of this incident. Upon further investigation, the
computer crimes analyst determined that the officer’s log on password was used to enter the
unauthorized web sites. The officer then admitted to his wrongdoing and stated it would never
happen again. This officer has been with your organization for 15 years, and the only other
disciplinary action taken against him was for being involved in an at-fault traffic accident 10
years ago. As the Chief of Police, how would you handle this situation?
Would you terminate this 15-year veteran with a virtually clean record? Why?
Or would you impose significant disciplinary action as opposed to termination? Why?
As part of this research paper, read the following United States Supreme Court Cases:
Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963)
Giglio v. United States, 405 U. S. 150 (1972)
United States v. Agurs, 427 U. S. 97 (1976)
Kyles v. Whitley, 514 U. S. 419 (1995)
United States v. Bagley, 473 U. S. 667 (1985)