Critical Evaluation of Research and Theory #6
2148517
mgt575_handout6_quality_of_research-qualitative.docxMGT575 – Handout 5 (Fig. 11.9)
Criteria for Evaluating the Quality of a Study's Qualitative Data Analysis and Report of Results
Use the following criteria to evaluate the quality of a qualitative study's data analysis and results as specified within a research report. For each evaluation item, indicate the following ratings:
+ You rate the item as "high quality" for the study.
You rate the item as "ok quality" for the study.
- You rate the item as "low quality" for the study.
In addition to your rating, make notes about each element when you apply these criteria to an actual published study.
Study:
|
In a high-quality qualitative research report, the author . . . |
Application to a Published Study: |
|
|
|
Your Rating |
Your Notes |
|
1. Analyzes the data to respond to each research question.
|
|
|
|
2. Discusses preparing the data, including transcribing the data verbatim so an accurate record is available for analysis.
|
|
|
|
3. Uses a software program to facilitate the analysis of all the collected data.
|
|
|
|
4. Uses multiple stages of analysis (reading, memoing, coding, theme and description development, and relating themes).
|
|
|
|
5. Uses at least three strategies to validate his/her findings.
|
|
|
|
6. Discusses how his/her role influenced the interpretation of the findings.
|
|
|
|
7. Reports 5-7 themes and builds multiple perspectives, subthemes, and quotes into the theme descriptions.
|
|
|
|
8. Includes a rich description of people, places, or events in a setting so you feel like you have met the people or are in the setting.
|
|
|
