Is Mandatory Prospective Trial Registration Working to Prevent Publication of Unregistered Trials and Selective Outcome Reporting? An Observational Study of Five Psychiatry Journals That Mandate Prospective Clinical Trial Registration.
Scott, Rucklindge, & Mulder (2015) claim that prospective registration with no changes in POMs occurred more frequently with pharmaceutical funding. The problem is the bias occurring in the medical literature associated with selective outcome. In 2005, the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors introduced a policy to require registration of all clinic and trials into a registry to enrolment and registration of any clinical trial. The article must meet before they are published in order to encourage less discrepancy. Researcher used a qualitative method. In the experiment, the researches choose Journals the ICMIE guidelines .Then; the researches got articles from this Journal between 2009 and July 2013. Finally, the researches ran the articles through different computer programs to find discrepancies. To get a good result the research set stander for the data they collected and only analyzed articles within the stander. Of the 181 trails 60 were correctly resistor of those 60 17 showed discrepancies in the outcome majors between trial registry and published article. 4-3 the articles did not have discrepancies .Finally, different in participant numbers between the published article and the trial registry occurred new different to 67,9 %change. The researcher wants to see new guidelines that Journal.
Scott, A., Rucklidge, J. J., & Mulder, R. T. (2015). Is mandatory prospective trial
registration working to prevent publication of unregistered trials and selective
outcome reporting? An observational study of five psychiatry journals that
mandate prospective Clinical trial registration. Plos ONE, 10(8), 1-13.
doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0133718.
abubattal
summary_1.docx
0
