Bank Analysis

profileAnhdon
case_study_grading_rubric.docx

GRADING RUBRIC – ANALYSIS ASSIGNMENT – FINANCE 438, SPRING 2015

DOES NOT MEET MINIMUM – REALLY DOESN’T GET IT

GRADE: 50% OR LESS OF MAX PTS

MEETS MINIMUM – MERELY GETS THE JOB DONE – FOLLOWS INSTRUCTIONS

GRADE: 50 – 65% OF MAX PTS

ABOVE AVERAGE – I.E., THINKS

GRADE: 65 – 85% OF MAX PTS

OUTSTANDING – I.E., THINKS OUTSIDE THE BOX

85 – 100% OF MAX PTS.

DESCRIBeS the particulars of the case SUBJECT

MAXIMUM POINTS:5

MISSES THE BOAT MOSTLY OR COMPLETELY – CLUELESS AS TO THE MEANING OF BASIC CONCEPTS

DESCRIBES CASE SUBJECT PARTICULARS WITHOUT FURTHER ELABORATION.

DESCRIBES CASE SUBJECT PARTICULARS AND PROVIDES MORE RELEVANT DETAIL, PLACING CASE IN CONTEXT.

DESCRIBES CASE SUBJECT IN DETAIL BUT NOT SUPERFLOUSLY, USINGOUTSIDE SOURCES AND APPROACHES TO PLACE SUBJECT IN CONTEXT.

articulateS the FINANCIAL STRUCture of the SUBJECT

MAXIMUM POINTS: 10

FAILS TO RECOGNIZE THE CASE SUBJECT’S ISSUES AND/OR FAILS TO UNDERSTAND THE NATURE AND PURPOSE OF THE CASE STUDY.

DEMONSTRATES AN UNDERSTANDING OF THE PROBLEM ONLY. NO FURTHER RELEVANT ELABORATION

DEMONSTRATES A THOROUGH UNDERSTANDING OF THE SUBJECT’S FINANCIAL STRUCTURE AND ITS RAMIFICATIONS.

DEMONSTRATES A THOROUGH UNDERSTANDING OF THE SUBJECT’S FINANCIAL STRUCTURE AND ITS RAMIFICATIONS. RELATES THE PROBLEM TO RECENT PRACTICES, AND/OR USES OTHER SOURCES TO EXPLAIN PROBLEM RAMIFICATIONS

ANALYSIS & CONCLUSIONS

MAXIMUM POINTS: 20

FAILS TO REACH LOGICAL CONCLUSIONS FROM DATA PRESENTED.

REACHES BASIC CONCLUSIONS.

REACHES CONCLUSIONS WHICH DEMONSTRATE THOROUGH UNDERSTANDING OF THE ANALYSIS.

REACHES CONCLUSIONS WHICH DEMONSTRATE A THOROUGH UNDERSTANDING OF THE ANALYSIS AND THE ABILITY TO PLACE IN HISTORIC OR CURRENT CONDITION CONTEXT.

OFFERED FINDINGS

MAXIMUM POINTS: 10

NONE OFFERED.

OFFEREED SOME CONCLUSION, NOT STRONGLY THOUGHT OUT

OFFERED CONCLUSION WITH LOGIC AND FORESIGHT.

OFFERED CONCLUSION WITH EXCEPTIONAL SOPHISTICATION – THOUGHT “OUTSIDE THE BOX”.

SOPHISTICATION OF PRESENTATION

MAXIMUM POINTS: 5

USES LESS-THAN HIGH SCHOOL ENGLISH AND SLANG. (IN FACT, IS IT REALLY ENGLISH?)

USES UNDERGRADUATE-LEVEL LANGUAGE; NOTHING SPECIAL.

DEMONSTRATES GOOD VERBAL SKILLS AND A SOPHISTICATED VOCABULARY.

DEMONSTRATES OUTSTANDING VERBAL SKILLS AND HIGHLY EFFECTIVE AND SOPHISTICATED VOCABULARY.