|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DOES NOT MEET MINIMUM – REALLY DOESN’T GET IT
GRADE: 50% OR LESS OF MAX PTS
|
MEETS MINIMUM – MERELY GETS THE JOB DONE – FOLLOWS INSTRUCTIONS
GRADE: 50 – 65% OF MAX PTS
|
ABOVE AVERAGE – I.E., THINKS
GRADE: 65 – 85% OF MAX PTS
|
OUTSTANDING – I.E., THINKS OUTSIDE THE BOX
85 – 100% OF MAX PTS.
|
|
DESCRIBeS the particulars of the case SUBJECT
MAXIMUM POINTS:5
|
MISSES THE BOAT MOSTLY OR COMPLETELY – CLUELESS AS TO THE MEANING OF BASIC CONCEPTS
|
DESCRIBES CASE SUBJECT PARTICULARS WITHOUT FURTHER ELABORATION.
|
DESCRIBES CASE SUBJECT PARTICULARS AND PROVIDES MORE RELEVANT DETAIL, PLACING CASE IN CONTEXT.
|
DESCRIBES CASE SUBJECT IN DETAIL BUT NOT SUPERFLOUSLY, USINGOUTSIDE SOURCES AND APPROACHES TO PLACE SUBJECT IN CONTEXT.
|
|
articulateS the FINANCIAL STRUCture of the SUBJECT
MAXIMUM POINTS: 10
|
FAILS TO RECOGNIZE THE CASE SUBJECT’S ISSUES AND/OR FAILS TO UNDERSTAND THE NATURE AND PURPOSE OF THE CASE STUDY.
|
DEMONSTRATES AN UNDERSTANDING OF THE PROBLEM ONLY. NO FURTHER RELEVANT ELABORATION
|
DEMONSTRATES A THOROUGH UNDERSTANDING OF THE SUBJECT’S FINANCIAL STRUCTURE AND ITS RAMIFICATIONS.
|
DEMONSTRATES A THOROUGH UNDERSTANDING OF THE SUBJECT’S FINANCIAL STRUCTURE AND ITS RAMIFICATIONS. RELATES THE PROBLEM TO RECENT PRACTICES, AND/OR USES OTHER SOURCES TO EXPLAIN PROBLEM RAMIFICATIONS
|
|
ANALYSIS & CONCLUSIONS
MAXIMUM POINTS: 20
|
FAILS TO REACH LOGICAL CONCLUSIONS FROM DATA PRESENTED.
|
REACHES BASIC CONCLUSIONS.
|
REACHES CONCLUSIONS WHICH DEMONSTRATE THOROUGH UNDERSTANDING OF THE ANALYSIS.
|
REACHES CONCLUSIONS WHICH DEMONSTRATE A THOROUGH UNDERSTANDING OF THE ANALYSIS AND THE ABILITY TO PLACE IN HISTORIC OR CURRENT CONDITION CONTEXT.
|
|
OFFERED FINDINGS
MAXIMUM POINTS: 10
|
NONE OFFERED.
|
OFFEREED SOME CONCLUSION, NOT STRONGLY THOUGHT OUT
|
OFFERED CONCLUSION WITH LOGIC AND FORESIGHT.
|
OFFERED CONCLUSION WITH EXCEPTIONAL SOPHISTICATION – THOUGHT “OUTSIDE THE BOX”.
|
|
SOPHISTICATION OF PRESENTATION
MAXIMUM POINTS: 5
|
USES LESS-THAN HIGH SCHOOL ENGLISH AND SLANG. (IN FACT, IS IT REALLY ENGLISH?)
|
USES UNDERGRADUATE-LEVEL LANGUAGE; NOTHING SPECIAL.
|
DEMONSTRATES GOOD VERBAL SKILLS AND A SOPHISTICATED VOCABULARY.
|
DEMONSTRATES OUTSTANDING VERBAL SKILLS AND HIGHLY EFFECTIVE AND SOPHISTICATED VOCABULARY.
|