Reflection

SUMMARY OF REFLECTION

1.  How the information that you gleaned from the interview contributes to your knowledge of the child you selected for your Child Observation Project

Based on the observation of Hillary it is clear to realize that she is a relatively intelligent child. This is due to the fact that at 4 years old, she is capable of depicting the advanced use of cognitive functions. This is evident by the fact that at first she is quiet always seeming to be self-absorbed but this is just a ploy. She is very quiet at first and this can often be confused for being due to the notion that she is shy but that is not the case as deduced. Hillary has adapted the art of critical thinking as it was evident because she was not self-absorbed as we gathered when we tried to talk about her thinking she wasn’t listening only for her to answer, saying that she did not actually have a problem with socializing but she just understood that not every situation required a response. She said that her mother had expressly told her to learn to take time and think of something before she spoke. This observation had started with the intent of investigating her social development but it was becoming clear that she did not necessarily have a social problem but she was just a product of her environment.

2.  Information, knowledge, and/or advice from the Parent/Family Member Interview Sheet that you want to remember in order to facilitate your observation 

Hillary is clearly a product of growing up around four teens and adults in her life and for the most part she is bound to inherit their behavior. This was not meant to be the focus of the observation, but it was clearly turning into a cognitive war on social development. More critical analysis I came to the realization that Hillary was a product of her environment and socialization as she was a direct mirror of her relative. But the most amazing part of the visit and subsequent observation is the fact that through it became apparent that the behavior is not the only thing that was being influenced by the family but rather the family was helping to nurture Hillary’s cognitive development. This is due to the fact that it requires a tremendous amount of brain ability to be instructed and Hillary clearly was keen on following instructions.

Also, as the observation went on it was apparent to see that Hillary had heightened thinking and deduction capability as she was watching a television show meant for the age group of 13 years and above and she actually very intriguing and charismatic. She expressed extensive concentration and thinking as she was subjected by me and other grownups. For her age, it was clear from other activities the level of maturity that she possessed, but more so the thinking capabilities she portrayed. The best example is the fact that she was concentrating on the completion of a jigsaw puzzle and she was doing a great job of completing it. Many would have attributed this to the fact that she might have been artistically gifted but we need to understand that all other bodily functions from motor skills to speech are a portrayal of a person’s cognitive prowess and for a 4 year old it is clear that Hillary is exceptionally gifted. As a recommendation further observation should be undertaken to confirm but in case it is confirmed then she should be enrolled into an extra credits program that will nurture her cognitive prowess.

EDUC 3003 Application Assignment Evaluation Criteria

Application Assignments are worth a maximum of 425 points for the entire course.

Note: For privacy purposes, you may not include the actual name of any student, parent, or professional referenced in the assignment.

68–85 points

1. The response demonstrates a full understanding and correct use of the concepts and/or strategies as presented in the Learning Resources.

1. The response follows directions and includes all components indicated in the instructions. If requested, references are included and properly cited.

1. The writing demonstrates mastery of all criteria for high academic literacy standards as indicated in “Writing Across the Curriculum” (see below).

45–67 points

1. The response demonstrates a general understanding and correct use of the concepts and/or strategies as presented in the Learning Resources.

1. The response follows directions and includes most components indicated in the instructions. If requested, references are included and properly cited.

1. The writing demonstrates mastery of most criteria for high academic literacy standards as indicated in “Writing Across the Curriculum” (see below).

44 or fewer points

1. The response demonstrates a minimal understanding and correct use of the concepts and/or strategies as presented in the Learning Resources.

1. The response does not follow all directions and is missing components indicated in the instructions. If requested, references are not included and properly cited.

1. The writing is unclear and/or disorganized. Thoughts are not expressed in a logical manner. Few criteria for high academic literacy standards as indicated in “Writing Across the Curriculum” (see below) are followed.

Writing Across the Curriculum

Walden University is committed to high academic literacy standards. To develop these skills in students, this course has a strong emphasis on written assignments which may include content review questions, Application Assignments, case study analyses, observations, and online Discussions. All assignments are expected to meet the following standards:

1. Clear central idea carefully and coherently developed and with intended emphasis

1. Correct grammar; no persistent mechanical errors

1. Neat appearance with evidence of having been carefully proofread

1. Academic integrity and honesty

1. Full documentation of research work

1. References cited using APA style (except in Discussion postings)