International Marketing (mid ex)

profilebbq65b20a06
ipptchap002.pptx

The Dynamic Environment of International Trade

Chapter 2

McGraw-Hill/Irwin

Copyright © 2013 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

Trade Barriers

Barriers to trade are one of the major issues confronting international marketers

They can be tariff or non-tariff barriers

Countries continue to use non-tariff barriers for a variety of reasons

Tariff barriers have reduced considerably in recent years

2-‹#›

Whether it is legislation regarding Pringles being the same potato chips in the UK and causing additional value added taxes for P&G or what percentage of California Rice can be mixed with “inferior” Japanese rice and still be labeled California Rice, these are examples of non-tariff trade barriers that can be used to prevent the easy entry of foreign companies into the country.

2

Exhibit 2.1 Top Ten 2011 U.S. Trading Partners ($ billions, merchandise trade)

2-3

Media, global communications and technology has allowed world trade to flourish and expand in recent years. As Exhibit 2.1 illustrates, world trade is an important economic activity. Increased competition also leads to increased protectionism. The creation of the World Trade Organization (WTO) is one of the biggest advancement for free trade among countries. Trade statistics such as those listed in Exhibit 2.1 have often served to focus the attention of government officials around the world. We should however, view this data with caution. For example, although it is evident that the imbalance of trade is the biggest with China for the United States. However, often U.S. imports from China include a majority of parts made in other countries. The parts of the majority of computers assembled in China (Lenovo for example) are made in surrounding countries like Taiwan.

3

2-4

Over the past 30 years, U.S. dominance in export markets has diminished as Japan, Germany, and a number of newly industrialized countries such as South Korea and China have taken a larger share of world exports. Similarly, the industrialized nations of Germany, France, and the United Kingdom, faced a decline in world market share of largest corporations. This decline in the position of the U.S. and other industrialized countries was a relative decline, reflecting the faster economic growth of several other countries, particularly in Asia.

4

World Trade and U.S. Multinationals

Dominance of U.S. multinationals in the 1950s and 1960s

Large investments by U.S. companies in Europe and Latin America

Concern in Latin America resulting in expropriation of direct U.S. investments

In Europe, there was strong public demand to limit foreign investment

2-‹#›

The threat felt by Europeans was best expressed in the popular book The American Challenge, published in 1968, in which the French author J. J. Servan-Schreiber wrote:

“Fifteen years from now it is quite possible that the world’s third greatest industrial power, just after the United States and Russia, will not be Europe but American Industry in Europe. Already, in the ninth year of the Common Market, this European market is basically American in organization.”

Servan-Schreiber’s prediction did not come true for many reasons as described in the following slides.

5

Source: Complied from annual reports of listed firms, 2012

2-6

The relative importance of U.S. multinational corporations (MNCs) after World War II declined where U.S. multinationals compete with strong corporations from Japan, Western Europe, Asia and many developing countries such as China and Mexico. This is forcing U.S. MNCs to examine new ways to remain competitive. From the 1960s to 2011, the U.S. moved from being the world's dominant industrial power to accounting for only 29 of the world’s 100 largest corporations (see Exhibit 2.3). 

Countries once classified as less developed were reclassified as newly industrialized countries (NICs). NICs such as Brazil, Mexico, South Korea, Taiwan, Singapore, and Hong Kong went through experienced rapid industrialization in specific industries such as steel, shipbuilding, consumer electronics, auto mobiles, light aircraft, shoes, textiles, apparel, and more. In short, economic power and potential became more evenly distributed among countries and Servan-Schreiber warning to Europe about U.S. multinational domination did not come close to becoming true.

6

Exhibit 2.3 The Nationality of the World’s 100 Largest Industrial Corporations (size measured by annual revenues) Source: “2011 Global 500,” Fortune, http://www.fortune.com , 2012.

2-7

Balance of Trade Favorable balance of trade means that the US sold more to other countries than it bought from them.

The balance of merchandise trade also reflected the changing role of the United States in world trade

Between 1888 and 1971, the United States had a favorable balance of trade

By 1971, the United States had a trade deficit of $2 billion that grew to at $160 billion in 1987

Trade deficit peaked in 2007, with the continued weakness in the U.S. dollar

The positive consequence of the global financial crisis in 2008 in the United States was the halving of the U.S. trade deficit during 2009 from its high in 2007

2-‹#›

Favorable balance of trade means that the U.S. sold more to other countries than it bought from them.

8

Balance of Payments

When countries trade there are financial transactions among businesses or consumers of different nations

Money constantly flows into and out of a country

The system of accounts that records a nation’s international financial transactions is called its balance of payments (BP)

It records all financial transactions between a country’s firms, and residents, and the rest of the world usually over a year

The BP is maintained on a double-entry bookkeeping system

2-‹#›

As barriers to the free flow of goods, services, and capital have fallen over time, and as other countries increased their shares of world output, non-U.S. firms increasingly began to invest across national borders. If we look 20 years into the future, most forecasts now predict a rapid rise in the share of world output accounted for by developing nations such as China, India, Indonesia, Thailand, South Korea, Mexico, and Brazil, and a corresponding decline in the share of rich industrialized nations such as Great Britain, Germany, Japan, and the United States. The World Bank, for example, has estimated that if current trends continue, by 2020 the Chinese economy could be larger than that of the United States, while the economy of India will approach that of Germany. The World Bank also estimates that today's developing nations may account for more than 60 percent of world economic activity by 2020, while today's rich nations, which currently account for over 55 percent of world economic activity, may account for only about 38 percent by 2020.

As these trends continue and economies become closely tied with each other, one way to impact the inflow of goods and services into the domestic market is through the use of protectionism. The Balance of Payments and it reflects the economic position of the country. The more protectionist a country is, it imports less and exports more and that is reflected in its Balance of Payments as a surplus. The U.S. has had a negative balance of payments in recent years and the country that accounts for a large portion of this deficit is China. This can be explained by the fact that a lot of the consumer goods sold in the United States are manufactured and imported into the United States and the amount of goods and services exported from the U.S. into China is relatively small.

 

9

Balance of Payments

The BP is the difference between receipts and payments

2-10

Receipts

merchandise export sales.

money spent by foreign tourists.

transportation.

payments of dividends and interest from FDI abroad.

new foreign investments in the U.S.

Payments

costs of goods imported.

spending by U.S. tourists overseas.

new overseas investments.

cost of foreign military and economic aid.

Balance of Payments

A balance-of-payments statement includes three accounts

the current account, a record of all merchandise exports, imports, and services plus unilateral transfers of funds

the capital account, a record of direct investment, portfolio investment, and short-term capital movements to and from countries; and

the official reserves account, a record of exports and imports of gold, increases or decreases in foreign exchange, and increases or decreases in liabilities to foreign central banks.

Of the three, the current account is of primary interest to international business.

2-‹#›

11

Protectionism

The reality of trade is this is a world of tariffs, quotas, and nontariff barriers and nontariff barriers designed to protect a country’s markets from foreign investment

Although the World Trade Organization has been effective to some extent in reducing tariffs, countries still resort to measures of protectionism

Countries use legal barriers, exchange barriers, and psychological barriers to restrict the entry of unwanted goods

2-‹#›

The complex distribution system in Japan, is a good example of a market structure creating a barrier to trade. Most recently the United States and other countries have accused China of keeping the value of its currency artificially low to boost exports and limit exports.

12

Arguments for Protectionism

maintain employment and reduce unemployment

increase of business size, and

retaliation and bargaining

protection of the home market

need to keep money at home

encouragement of capital accumulation

2-‹#›

Arguments for Protectionism

maintenance of the standard of living and real wages

conservation of natural resources

protection of an infant industry

industrialization of a low-wage nation

national defense

2-‹#›

The Impact of Tariff (Tax) Barriers

Tariff Barriers tend to increase:

Inflationary pressures

Special interests’ privileges

Government control and political considerations in economic matters

The number of tariffs they beget via reciprocity

2-‹#›

The Impact of Tariff (Tax) Barriers

Tariff Barriers tend to weaken:

Balance-of-payments positions

Supply-and-demand patterns

International relations (they can start trade wars)

Tariff Barriers tend to restrict:

Manufacturer’ supply sources

Choices available to consumers

Competition

2-‹#›

Six Types of Non-Tariff Barriers

(1) Specific Limitations on Trade:

Quotas

Import Licensing requirements

Proportion restrictions of foreign to domestic goods (local content requirements)

Minimum import price limits

Embargoes

(2) Customs and Administrative Entry Procedures:

Valuation systems

Antidumping practices

Tariff classifications

Documentation requirements

Fees

2-‹#›

Six Types of Non-Tariff Barriers

(3) Standards:

Standard disparities

Intergovernmental acceptances of testing methods and standards

Packaging, labeling, and marking

(4) Government Participation in Trade:

Government procurement policies

Export subsidies

Countervailing duties

Domestic assistance programs

2-‹#›

Six Types of Non-Tariff Barriers

(5) Charges on imports:

Prior import deposit subsidies

Administrative fees

Special supplementary duties

Import credit discriminations

Variable levies

Border taxes

(6) Others:

Voluntary export restraints

Orderly marketing agreements

2-‹#›

Three Types of Monetary Barriers

Blocked currency: Blockage is accomplished by refusing to allow importers to exchange its national currency for the sellers’ currency.

Differential exchange rates: It encourages the importation of goods the government deems desirable and discourages importation of goods the government does not want by adjusting the exchange rate. The exchange rate for importation of a desirable product is favorable and vice-versa

Government approval: In countries where there is a severe shortage of foreign exchange, an exchange permit to import foreign goods is required from the government

2-‹#›

The Omnibus Trade and Competitiveness Act (OTCA) 1988

Many countries are allowed to trade freely with the United States but do not grant equal access to U.S. products in their countries.

To ease trade restrictions, the OTCA focused on correcting perceived injustice in trade practices.

It dealt with trade deficits, protectionism, and the overall fairness of our trading partners.

2-‹#›

The Omnibus Trade and Competitiveness Act (OTCA) 1988

Covers three areas for improving U.S. trade:

market access,

export expansion, and

import relief

2-‹#›

General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT)

Covers three basic areas:

trade shall be conducted on a nondiscriminatory basis;

protection shall be afforded domestic industries through customs tariffs, not through such commercial measures as import quotas; and

consultation shall be the primary method used to solve global trade problems.

2-‹#›

World Trade Organization (WTO)

It sets many rules governing trade between its 132 members

WTO provides a panel of experts to hear and rule on trade disputes between members, and, unlike GATT, issues binding decisions

Unlike GATT, WTO is an institution, not an agreement

2-‹#›

WTO

The Internet exposed protected industries to global competition

WTO was established January 1, 1995 through the Uruguay round of GATT (1986-1993)

Statutory powers to adjudicate trade disputes

2-‹#›

WTO

Permanent international organization

New legal and institutional foundation

Platform for trade relations: collective debate, negotiation and adjudication

Dispute settlement faster

Evolution of GATS, TRIMS, TRIPS

2-‹#›

The World Trade Organization (like its predecessor GATT) is primarily responsible for regulating world trade and making sure nation-states adhere to the rules laid down in trade treaties signed by WTO member states. 147 nations that collectively accounted for 97 percent of world trade are members of the WTO, thereby giving the organization enormous scope and influence. The WTO is also responsible for facilitating the establishment of additional multinational agreements between WTO member states. Over its entire history, and that of the GATT before it, the WTO has promoted the lowering of barriers to cross-border trade and investment. In doing so, the WTO has been the instrument of its member states, which have sought to create a more open global business system unencumbered by barriers to trade and investment between countries. Without an institution such as the WTO, the globalization of markets and production is unlikely to have proceeded as far as it has. It is interesting to see the history of WTO’s dispute resolution among countries. See the “Banana Wars” (http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/8391752.stm) dispute that has been ongoing for over 16 years and the resolution in the case for an example of the role of the WTO and the type of disputes that it has ruled on. Immediately after the Banana Wars ruling, the EU filed a complaint with the WTO against the U.S. that establishing Foreign Sales Corporations (http://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/dispu_e/cases_e/ds108_e.htm) gives the U.S.an undue tax advantage and should not be allowed to make the playing field level for all countries.

26

The IMF and the World Bank

The International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the World Bank Group are two global institutions created to assist nations in becoming and remaining economically viable.

These organizations play important roles in international trade:

by helping maintain stability in the financial markets and

by assisting countries that are seeking economic development and restructuring

2-‹#›

The International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the World Bank were both created in 1944 by 44 nations that met at Bretton Woods, New Hampshire. The task of the IMF was to maintain order in the international monetary system, and that of the World Bank was to promote economic development. In the 60 years since their creation, both institutions have emerged as significant players in the global economy. The World Bank is the less controversial of the two sister institutions. It has focused on making low-interest-rate loans to cash-strapped governments in poor nations that wish to undertake significant infrastructure investments (such as building dams or roads). The IMF is often seen as the lender of last resort to nation-states whose economies are in turmoil and currencies are losing value against those of other nations. Frequently, in the recent past, for example, the IMF has bailed out governments of troubled nation states, including Argentina, Indonesia, Mexico, Russia, South Korea, Thailand, and Turkey.

27