Writing a summary
cljyer2233
ej1022049.pdf
Keep taking the tablets? Assessing the use of tablet devices in learning and teaching activities in the Further Education sector
Khristin Fabian and Donald MacLean*
Learning Technologies Centre, Perth College UHI, Perth, Scotland
(Received 19 August 2013; final version received 19 August 2013)
This article summarises the methodology and outcomes of an interventionist/ action research project to assess the benefits, and potential pitfalls, of the use of mobile devices in learning and teaching activities in a Further Education environment. A bank of 15 tablet devices were purchased and prepared for classroom use. Staff members were approached to scope potential activities and uses for the tablet devices. Three departments took part in the research activity: the Language School, Social and Vocational Studies and the Hairdressing department. Use of the tablets was varied in nature and included: use of multimedia tools, use of apps, creation and use of a bespoke app, multimedia manipulation and sharing, and creation of an online e-portfolio. Staff and student feedback was gathered during and after the project, and project authors were present during classroom activities for observation and recording purposes. Overall feedback was very positive, but there were issues with tablet use and administration. One of the major issues was the onerous nature of the security setup, and app administration.
Keywords: mobile technology; tablets; student attitudes; staff attitudes; mobile classroom
Introduction
There is a growing interest in the use of mobile technologies in the educational sector,
evidenced by both research and uptake in the use of tablets and mobile phones in K�12 and Higher Education (Groupe Spéciale Mobile Association (GSMA) 2012; Wu et al.
2012). The recent New Media Consortium (NMC) Horizon Report (Johnson et al.
2013) identified that the adoption of tablet computing in higher education would occur
within a year or less, signifying that adoption is actually already established in some
areas. Key opportunities in mobile learning include: encourage anytime, anywhere
learning; reach underserved children; improve 21st century social interactions; fit
with learning environments; and enable a personalized learning experience (Shuler
2009, p. 6). In their toolkit for adopting mobile learning, Joint Information Systems
Committee (JISC) (2011) provided some tangible benefits associated with the use of
mobile technologies. Most of these are examples on Shuler’s list but also add the
promotion of active learning, enablement of new learning environments, and
accessibility, to the list of tangible benefits when using mobile technologies.
*Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Research in Learning Technology
Vol. 22, 2014
Research in Learning Technology 2014. # 2014 K. Fabian and D. MacLean. Research in Learning Technology is the journal of the Association
for Learning Technology (ALT), a UK-based professional and scholarly society and membership organisation. ALT is registered charity number
1063519. http://www.alt.ac.uk/. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons CC-BY 4.0 License (http://
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix,
transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
1
Citation: Research in Learning Technology 2014, 22: 22648 - http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v22.22648
(page number not for citation purpose)
Recently, the University of Hull was commissioned by the Scottish government to
research the affordability and effectiveness of iPads in education (Burden et al. 2012).
The study found that the use of tablet devices such as the iPad facilitates the
achievement of many of the core elements required within the Curriculum for
Excellence framework. It also noted that the adoption of mobile technologies comes
with many attendant benefits for learning, which include motivation, engagement,
parental involvement, and understanding of complex ideas. Furthermore, the study
having tried several setups for implementing the use of the iPad, found that the personal ownership of the device is the single most important factor for successful
use (Burden et al. 2012, p. 9). Although this report is encouraging, it flags up the issue
of cost of implementation in Further Education, with more students, and many more
simultaneous classes.
This pilot study aims to investigate the benefits as well as the potential issues in
implementing the use of mobile devices as shared devices, and aims to answer the
following questions:
(1) What are the benefits linked to the use of tablet devices in the classroom?
(2) What are the potential issues linked to tablet use?
Literature review
The rate of adoption of mobile devices in Further Education compared to K�12 has been at a slower pace and smaller in scale (Wishart and Green 2010). A search of
education index databases using the search term ‘mobile learning’ in Further
Education and its counterparts produced only a handful of results in comparison to a search of mobile learning in K�12 and higher education. Whilst dissemination of mobile learning in Further Education has been limited in peer-reviewed journals,
m-learning in Further Education has attracted attention via a proliferation of case
studies and good practice on the Internet.
Amongst the attributed benefits of mobile learning in Further Education were the
improvement of communication channels, updating students about course materials
via SMS (Derwen College 2008) and other forms of alerts and updates through
mobile devices. This process has proven to be useful in engaging students and has improved learner welfare and retention (Northampton College 2010; Yorkshire Coast
College 2010).
On a one tablet per class setup, there are cost benefits associated with cheaper
applications on tablets and cheaper hardware (Bridgewater College 2013; Clydebank
College 2012). Mobile devices also facilitated location-based assessments (Excellence
Gateway 2008; South Lanarkshire College 2012) allowing assessors to document
student progress using various multimedia. This highlights not just the digitisation of
processes, but also the manner in which mobile technologies can widen the physical scope of the classroom environment.
Location-based learning using mobile devices facilitated learners to have mean-
ingful language interaction (JISC 2005b) and explore concepts in authentic
environments (Lius 2011; Mobiilisti 2012). In addition, the mobility of these devices
allows learners to engage with their learning materials anytime, anywhere and not
just in the classroom environment (JISC 2005a).
Mobile devices have now evolved from mere communication tools to pocket
computers with their own share of added functionalities and limitations. Patten,
K. Fabian and D. MacLean
2 (page number not for citation purpose)
Citation: Research in Learning Technology 2014, 22: 22648 - http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v22.22648
Sánchez, and Tangney (2006) identified seven functions by which a mobile device
would serve educational requirements: administration, referential, interactive, micro
world, data collection, location aware, and collaborative. The first four items are
functions that can be carried out with traditional fixed-location computers while the
latter three items highlight beneficial features of mobile devices. Patten’s framework
shows that a variety of learning activities can be carried out with mobile devices.
Puentedura (2009) introduced the Substitution Augmentation Modification
Redefinition (SAMR) model for technology integration (see Figure 1). The framework states that technology adoption ranges from substitution, where the technology acts as
a direct substitute for traditional tools, to that of redefinition, where the technology
allows for the creation of new tasks previously inconceivable. These two frameworks of
mobile use and technology integration will be used to evaluate the range of activities
carried out in the different subjects during the intervention, alongside the evaluation of
the benefits of using mobile devices.
Methodology
This is an interventionist/action research project that examines how the use of tablets
as a shared device can contribute in a Further Education learning environment. The authors’ role in the research was interventionist, in that propositions were identified,
and then practitioners were consulted to invite their collaboration to help to prove or
disprove the propositions. Action research was then undertaken in various classroom
scenarios to observe, gather data, and evaluate outcomes.
Project description
The pilot project was undertaken between November 2012 and May 2013, covering a
period of 6 months. Prior to the start of the pilot project, potential partners were
identified. The subject areas chosen were Hairdressing, the Language School and Social and Vocational Studies (SVS) to spread the diversity of the pilot study.
Figure 1. SAMR model of technology integration (Puentedura 2009).
Research in Learning Technology
Citation: Research in Learning Technology 2014, 22: 22648 - http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v22.22648 3 (page number not for citation purpose)
The SVS department at Perth College works with students with additional
learning support needs, and these can be at the extreme end of the support scale.
They work to ensure that students can attain and achieve, and progress through the
system to obtain higher level qualifications.
Contact with lecturers from the three subject areas was established at the outset.
The lecturers involved were briefed about the nature of the pilot study and were also
given introductory training on how to use the tablets and potential learning activities.
The lecturers were also provided with individual tablets for the duration of the pilot study to allow them to explore the various apps available on the market.
Lecturers decided when and how they would implement the tablets in their lesson
planning, whilst trying not to disrupt the normal course of activities for the semester.
Support from the Learning Technologies Centre was provided in terms of technical
guidance on the use of the tablets; pedagogical support by providing exemplars of
use; and in the case of one subject area, the development of a bespoke application.
Throughout the pilot study, this partnership was maintained through immediate
feedback on the part of the lecturers and on-going support on the part of the Learning Technologies Centre.
Joint Information Systems Committee Regional Support Centre (JISC RSC)
Scotland were involved in this pilot project, offering support for the SVS project,
which used the Infolio tool created by JISC Techdis, (York, United Kingdom). This
tool is still under development, and the project offered feedback to JISC about
practical use of the tool, as well as suggestions for its improvement.
Participants
The lecturers were nominated because of their track record in using innovative
technologies in the classroom and their previous involvement with the Learning
Technologies Centre. They also had ideas for specific uses for the tablets, and were
prepared to plan and prepare for such use. These lecturers then selected the classes to
trial the tablets. A summary of participant numbers during the pilot study is available
in Table 1.
Equipment
Three operating systems were considered: Android, Apple and Windows 8. Windows
8 was attractive from an organisational viewpoint, because there was a potential for
operating via the College network for security and identification purposes. However,
at that time Win 8 tablets were not generally available and price was an issue. Android
was chosen on the basis of two factors: price, and the relative ease of native app
creation.
Table 1. Summary of participants per subject area.
Subject area Number of
practitioners involved Number of classes
involved Total number of
participants
Cluster 1: Language 1 3 54 Cluster 2: Hairdressing 1 2 50 Cluster 3: SVS 2 4 40 Total 4 9 144
K. Fabian and D. MacLean
4 (page number not for citation purpose)
Citation: Research in Learning Technology 2014, 22: 22648 - http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v22.22648
A bank of 15 Samsung Galaxy Tab 2 10.1 tablets were purchased together with a
20-slot charging unit. The devices run on the Android 4.0 operating system, and have
front and back facing cameras. This purchase was financed by the college.
Students did not always have 1:1 access to devices. Students in SVS had a 1:1 ratio
during use, but hairdressing and Language School students had to share devices.
Three was the maximum number of student groups.
Data collection and analysis
Data in the form of observation, video recordings, practitioner interviews, and survey
data were gathered throughout the pilot study. The authors conducted all interviews
with practitioners, and recorded classroom activity for analysis. One camcorder on
a tripod and one portable flip-camera were used to record classroom activities. Practitioner interviews were conducted throughout the 6-month period; two informal
interviews, and one final formal interview per curricular area. The informal
interviews were related to progress and immediate issues, and the formal interviews
were more evaluative in nature. Student surveys were conducted at the end of the
intervention.
Results and discussion
This section outlines the results of the pilot study in terms of (1) the range of
activities the tablets were able to support; (2) student engagement; and (3) issues
encountered.
A variety of learning activities were carried out using the tablets as shown in Table 2. Most of these activities were carried out as group activities with 2�3 members in a group. In the SVS area, it was possible to provide a one-to-one student
� tablet provision, with some activities carried out individually, and later converged into a group activity.
The assortment of activities carried out varied greatly, ranging from referential to
collaborative activities. Table 3 shows how each subject area utilized the tablets
Table 2. Activities carried out with the tablets.
Language Hairdressing SVS
Used the Internet to gather artefacts ª ª Used the tablet camera (video and photos) ª ª ª Used free and paid for apps available from the Android†
Market ª1 ª2
Used bespoke apps ª Created content with the tablet (aside from photos and
videos) ª3 ª4
Used the tablet to access Blackboard ª ª Used the tablets to create an e-portfolio ª Used the tablets for word processing ª Used the tablets to carry out learning activities outside
the classroom ª ª
1. LearnEnglish Grammar; English Class Demo; Socrative Student; Skitch; Comic Strip It (lite).
2. Virtual Makeover; Hair design game; Clairol Studio; Polaris.
3. Annotated images; Comics.
4. Moodboards.
Research in Learning Technology
Citation: Research in Learning Technology 2014, 22: 22648 - http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v22.22648 5 (page number not for citation purpose)
following Patten, Sánchez, and Tangney (2006) functional pedagogical framework.
This shows that tablets can be suitable alternatives for the standard fixed-location
computers. At the same time, the tablet’s data gathering features, as well as its form
factor, make it suitable for carrying out collaborative learning activities inside or
outside the classroom.
The activities carried out with the tablets in the various subject areas are analysed
in terms of the SAMR model. The tablet feature(s) used, the nature of the activity,
information on how an activity is normally carried out without the tablets, and the
mapping of these tablet-based activities to the SAMR model is available on Table 4.
From Table 4, it can be seen that some activities carried out with the tablets offer
only minor enhancements, such as the use of the tablet for word processing, whereby
the only measurable benefit, as the practitioner states, is that it made reading the
student output a lot easier as opposed to a short story written on paper. In one case,
this minor enhancement provided a functional improvement, namely, the case of
using the Socrative App, which allowed the lecturer to see how many students had
made a mistake. This allowed for instant corrective action or advice. The Socrative
App allows the lecturer to ask questions in the form of a multiple choice question
or a short answer without having to create the questions in advance. This way,
the question can be elsewhere (e.g. from a textbook, or a totally new, impromptu
concept), which is a valued feature over some traditional classroom response systems.
Some tasks constituted a transformation of the learning activity and from Table 4
we can see that these are activities that made use of the tablet’s multiple features for
the same task. This highlights how the multiple features and functions of the tablets
make them suitable tools to be used in the classroom environment, making previously
unrealistic activities feasible.
Student engagement and feedback
The practitioners reported that students enjoyed using the tablets regardless of which
spectrum of the SAMR model this technology integration fell into. In one instance of
using the LearnEnglish App, the practitioner reported that students spent as much as
45 minutes exploring the app and trying out the different exercises before eventually
becoming disengaged and looking for further direction. Whilst the novelty of the
device may explain this enthusiasm in engaging the students, it flags up that altering
the usual course methodologies can come with benefits, such as improved
engagement with the learning activity, and the ability to carry out tasks they could
not have done by traditional methods.
Table 3. Activities mapped into Patten, Sánchez, and Tangney (2006) functional pedagogical framework.
Language Hairdressing SVS
Administration Referential ª ª Interactive ª ª Microworld Data collection ª ª ª Location aware Collaborative ª ª
K. Fabian and D. MacLean
6 (page number not for citation purpose)
Citation: Research in Learning Technology 2014, 22: 22648 - http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v22.22648
Table 4. Activities carried out with the tablets mapped into SAMR model.
Subject area Tablet feature(s) used Activity How this activity is normally carried out SAMR model
Language Word processor Students created a short story of 50 words in pairs using the tablet.
This was normally carried out using pens and paper
Substitution
Language LearnEnglish Grammar App
Students used the app to do multiple choice exercises in pairs.
Students have access to exercises of the same kind using computers.
Substitution
Language Socrative (classroom response system)
The practitioner asked a series of questions and had the students key in their replies using the app.
This can be done orally or by having students simply raise their hands.
Augmentation
Language Video camera � Multimedia player
Students used the tablets to capture videos of themselves having a conversation with another student. They then played back this recording and tried to critique the conversations they had recorded.
Part 1 of this activity was normally carried out with audio recordings with pairs of students doing a recording one at a time. Part 2 of the activity is normally not carried out.
Modification
Language Comic Strip It � Tablet camera
Students created a comics story using the app and the tablet’s camera.
No suitable alternative. Redefinition
Language Tablet camera � Skitch Students use the tablet to go around the campus to capture some photographs. After which, they go back to the classroom to annotate the pictures that they have taken.
No suitable alternative. Redefinition
SVS Internet, Infolio � Camera
Students used the tablet to browse the Internet, take photographs and create their portfolio using the online web service Infolio.
Students used to access Infolio using computers, which resulted in a poor level of interaction between students. They also used a separate camera to take pictures and upload content to their portfolio.
Modification
Hairdressing Internet Students browse the Internet to look for the latest fashion trends. Youtube was used to allow students to have peer discussions and debates after watching the clips.
In a one-computer classroom setup, the videos are shown to the class for discussion.
Substitution
Hairdressing Polaris � Internet Students browsed the Internet for pictures to create moodboards using Polaris.
This was normally carried out using cutouts of pictures from magazines.
Augmentation
R e se
a rch
in L
e a
rn in
g T
e ch
n o
lo g
y
C ita
tio n
: R
e se
a rc
h in
L e a rn
in g
T e c h
n o
lo g y
2 0 1 4 ,
2 2 :
2 2 6 4 8
- h
ttp ://d
x .d
o i.o
rg /1
0 .3
4 0 2 /rlt.v
2 2 .2
2 6 4 8
7 (p
a g e
n u m
b e r
n o t
fo r
c ita
tio n
p u rp
o se
)
Table 4 (Continued )
Subject area Tablet feature(s) used Activity How this activity is normally carried out SAMR model
Hairdressing Video recorder � Playback
Students took videos of themselves as they were carrying out consultations. The recorded videos were then played back to the members of the group for peer-review and assessment.
This activity is normally carried out in pairs without the use of any technology.
Modification
Hairdressing Bespoke app Students used an app to help them check whether they were using the right colour choices and product for a service. In the app, students make a series of choices then click on ‘submit’ to find out whether their choices were correct. This results in more accurate and safer outcomes in terms of working with chemicals and hair colouring process. The app is being used in case studies and also with the hair salon clients. This app was installed on their own phones and in the tablets provided for in-class use.
Students do case studies using the book to aid in colour choices. There was no way to check whether the choices were right until they got to the part where they discuss their choices with the rest of the class.
Redefinition
K .
F a
b ia
n a
n d
D .
M a
c L
e a
n
8(p a g e
n u m
b e r
n o t
fo r
c ita
tio n
p u rp
o se
) C
ita tio
n :
R e se
a rc
h in
L e a rn
in g
T e c h
n o
lo g y
2 0 1 4 ,
2 2 :
2 2 6 4 8
- h
ttp ://d
x .d
o i.o
rg /1
0 .3
4 0 2 /rlt.v
2 2 .2
2 6 4 8
Overall, the students have reported that they enjoyed most of the activities as
evidenced in the evaluation questionnaire. A summary of the students’ survey
responses is available in Table 5. The survey was distributed at the end of the pilot study and uses a combination of questions using a Likert scale of 1 to 4 and open-
ended questions. Most of the students rated enjoyment of the tablet-based activities
as 3 or 4. A few students (n �6) out of the total 70 students completed the end- evaluation survey and rated their enjoyment with the activities as 1 or 2. In the open-
ended questions, a student clarified that she was not keen on using touch screen
interfaces and preferred to use a standard keyboard. These results highlight that the
use of tablets or new technologies will not be an automatic hit with all students.
Language school
Students reported in the survey that they liked the Grammar App and the discussion
board best. Whilst the discussion board activity is not mentioned in Table 5, this was
actually the end process for most of the activities in the language area. Completed
materials � a video interview, a comic or an annotated picture � are uploaded to the discussion board and shared with the rest of the class for feedback. Students valued
the higher levels of engagement encouraged by tablet use, but also valued activities
that improved their level of English speaking, whether from peer or tutor feedback.
Students also reported that they liked the collaborative aspect of undertaking the activities. In the walkabout activity, they described the learning activity as fun, new
and dynamic, referring to the seamless workspace the tablets provide. The students
were only asked to annotate two pictures but actually uploaded more than what was
required to Blackboard. The captions that they have provided on their journal upload
with captions like Photo Art, Crazy lesson and Lovely break are all indicative of their
positive engagement with the lesson.
Capturing video footage of the oral dialogues encouraged the participants to be
creative with the activity and included fantasy role play by some participants. The students were all happy to share their videos, which provided an effective peer
learning experience. This also provided a new method to critique their language skills,
and develop softer skills such as awareness of their own presence, ways of speaking,
posture, and personal interactions, as well as learning to be tactful and sensitive with
feedback to their peers.
The use of tablets in this subject area highlights the variety of activities that can be
undertaken with mobile devices. The activities they liked the most tended to correlate
with the ones from which they reported learning the most.
Table 5. Student survey results.
Language (n �16)
SVS (n �8)
Hairdressing (n �46)
How much did you enjoy using the tablets as part of your learning activities?
3.28 3.83 3.26
How much do you think that tablets helped in class? 2.93 3.67 3.15
How would you rate the activities carried out with the tablet in terms of it being . . . . . . engaging 3.2 3.83 3.14 . . . interesting 3.27 3.83 3.2 . . . relevant 3.27 3.83 3.14
Research in Learning Technology
Citation: Research in Learning Technology 2014, 22: 22648 - http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v22.22648 9 (page number not for citation purpose)
Social and vocational studies
Some of the potential benefits the authors underlined to encourage lecturer buy-in
at the start of the project were: the streamlined process of content, creation,
consumption, assessing and sharing. The mobility of tablets allows users to interact
with the environment as they carry out a learning activity. The tablet’s form factor is
another advantage over traditional computers because it does not take away the face-
to-face element in a learning activity. These potentials were realised during actual use.
Students would sit around a table in clear view of the lecturer as well as interacting
with their peers. This setup of the learning space is superior in comparison to
the traditional desktop computer setup, where students sit with their backs to the
classroom and tutor, and, therefore, are disconnected from their fellow classmates.
In the survey conducted with the students, all students gave the highest rating of
4 in terms of enjoying the activities with the tablet. There was consensus that the use
of the tablets helped in their class and that the use of the tablets is relevant,
particularly where the tablets help to create a final product, or where they helped
them to avoid mistakes. Students indicated that the tablet devices provided real
opportunity to engage with one another.
In terms of ease of use, students indicated that there were problems with tasks
such as copying and pasting items from the Web and also keying in text. There were
also a few problems with the compatibility of some Web sites, such as Infolio, with
the tablets, which were resolved by finding work-arounds for these limitations. These
technical problems led to some frustration on the part of the students during the
initial stages but they also highlight the beneficial role of peer and practitioner
support readily available in a face-to-face environment.
Hairdressing
Informal and survey feedback from students was positive. Students felt that the use of
the tablets made the lesson engaging and meaningful. The students particularly liked
the cognitive tool, which was installed on the tablets and their own phones, because
this helped them to track their own progress and flag up any areas where they were
making mistakes. They also liked the electronic research process and creating mood
boards using the tablets. Students reported that they liked the bespoke Android app
because it helped them master the theories related to hair colouring, whilst the mood
board activity allowed them to research the latest fashions and create ideas for
haircuts and colours.
The range of activities carried out in this subject area facilitated a link between
theoretical and practical knowledge. The design and implementation of tablet
materials gave ‘added value’ to traditional class-based activities previously used,
and encouraged students to engage with self-directed learning using their own mobile
devices.
Issues
Whilst the overall use of the tablets can be classified as successful judging from the
positive response from the students, the use of the tablets is not totally problem-free.
These issues have been grouped into technical and activity design issues.
K. Fabian and D. MacLean
10 (page number not for citation purpose)
Citation: Research in Learning Technology 2014, 22: 22648 - http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v22.22648
Technical issues
Students occasionally hit a brick wall due to unfamiliarity with the tablet tools or
operating system, and there was the occasional system crash. Wireless connectivity
and browser issues also caused students some problems. In these cases, the best
solution was to shut down and restart. On the other hand, tablets only take about 30
seconds to power up so even these ‘brick walls’ were not much of an issue in practice,
although they disrupted the continuity of the activity.
Tablets and current mobile devices are designed as personal devices. Multimedia
items are stored for easy sharing, and browsers are designed to remember keyboard
inputs to facilitate a better experience on the part of the user, with continued use
of the device. These personalization features, however, had to be locked down in a
shared setup, mainly for Data Protection and security issues. This means that apps
native to the device that personalizes the tablet were removed or locked down (apps
like Gmail and Email Client, Google Play and Settings). As the tablet setting
is locked down, Internet connectivity is defaulted to the college network. Students
would be able to login to the Internet via the browser using the same network
username and password, but would not be able to connect elsewhere. Locking down
the connection to the college network ensures that Internet activities on the tablet
remain within the College acceptable use policy and Joint Academic Network
(JANET) regulations.
The settings mentioned above were implemented before distributing the tablets
for shared use. However, this did not eliminate all privacy issues. Pictures and other
personal multimedia in the tablets had to be manually deleted after use. Students and
lecturers were also reminded that they had to log out of Web services like inFolio,
Gmail or Facebook every time they finish using the tablet, because these logins tend
to remain active even after shut down. No data protection or privacy issues were
raised during the 6-month trial with the three student groups.
Setting up a secure environment, loading the tablets with apps, and making any
kind of administrative changes offered a serious challenge throughout the project.
Dealing with app updates, removal of personal data and charging the devices, were
all onerous in terms of staff time.
Activity design issues
Some of the difficulties were about the mismatch between technology and activity
design. For example, using the tablets as word processors presented issues with input.
Whilst the tablet’s keyboard has the same layout as a standard keyboard, students
were not able to do touch-typing as they would on a keyboard and this caused a lot of
typographical errors. The tablet word spelling correction required precise input and
was more time consuming for students. In this case, using a standard computer would
probably have been the better choice.
All of the activities with the tablet were carried out collaboratively with the
exception of the activities conducted in the SVS subject area. This setup was required
mainly because of the limited number of devices available. However, some of the
learning tasks were not suited for collaborative work. For example, in the reading
task in language activities, a student commented that it is difficult to share a tablet,
and for both to concentrate on a reading task. This is an activity where the pace of
learners’ progress can vary and different levels of student pace can cause issues.
Research in Learning Technology
Citation: Research in Learning Technology 2014, 22: 22648 - http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v22.22648 11 (page number not for citation purpose)
In this example, one student had to wait for the other to finish before going through
the next page, whilst the other student would probably feel more pressured into
finishing the reading faster. This was also observed in an activity that required
students to transcribe the dialogue from the video their classmates had created, where
one student was controlling the technology in terms of when to pause and rewind. In
this case, the person controlling the device was more active in the transcription whilst
the other student was observed to step back.
Tablets are designed for one unique user. This is not to say that collaborative
activities are mismatched with tablets, but rather that collaborative activities with
tablets work best with activities that require joint decision-making and dialogue
between members of the group.
The issues discussed here are not exclusive to this study but have also been
discussed in other mobile learning papers (i.e. Clarke, Svanaes, and Zimmermann,
2013; Wishart and Green 2010), which highlights the importance of design factors in
mobile learning activities.
When designing mobile-based activities, two design layers need to be taken into
account during planning: the technical layer as well as the social environment. In the
technical layer, we check whether the mobile device is suitable for the type of activity
we want and in the social environment layer, we plan for projected student behaviour.
Conclusion
We have set out to identify the benefits linked to the use of tablet devices in
the classroom and any issues associated with tablet use. In terms of learning content,
the tablets were used in: content consumption, content creation and content sharing.
In terms of the range of learning activities carried out with the devices, they were
able to simulate activities possible with traditional computers, but at the same time
provide the face-to-face interaction often lost when working with desktop computers.
The design of the activities carried out in this pilot project highlighted col-
laborative learning, student discourse and peer support. In these activities, the mobile
devices can be seen as enablers that facilitated these student interactions. They also
highlight how the design of mobile technology supported activities that started as in-
class activities can be used to encourage students to engage with self-directed learning
using their own mobile devices.
It might be worth underlining that the use of tablets in class is not a panacea.
Whilst students displayed improved engagement during the activities, there were
tasks that did not fit very well with the tablets and there were tasks that were not
suited to be carried out as collaborative activities. Practitioner buy-in is a critical factor in the successful implementation of the
tablets, because the activities that produced the most positive student engagement
were those that called for a redefinition of the learning task. In addition, these new
technologies, including the apps that go with them, very rarely come with a manual,
which underlines the need for practitioner commitment to explore the market, and to
try various apps before use in the classroom. It became apparent that if practitioners
were enthusiastic about tablet use, that enthusiasm was taken up by the student. If
the same activities were repeated too often, or the tablets were used constantly, then
the students could become disengaged. The influence of the practitioner’s attitude
in the successful use of such technology cannot be overstated.
K. Fabian and D. MacLean
12 (page number not for citation purpose)
Citation: Research in Learning Technology 2014, 22: 22648 - http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v22.22648
It is apparent that there are advantages in the use of such technologies in the
classroom. Some of the technical issues encountered may be eradicated in the near
future as operating system manufacturers tackle the needs of educational use, and
administration and central control will be enabled by device and app management
systems. What is clear from this pilot study is that both students and staff enjoyed
using the tablets, that student engagement was improved in many cases as evidenced
by lecturer feedback and student surveys, and that tasks were carried out which
would have been unrealistic in the ‘traditional’ classroom environment.
There has been much research conducted on the use of mobile technologies in
classrooms, though the range particularly related to Further Education provision is
limited. Political considerations may mean that future research and procurement of
devices may need to be pan-organisational, to enable sharing of knowledge, and
potential cost savings.
Notes on contributors
John Small (Language Lecturer, Language School), Diane Murdoch and Tamie Viviers (both Lecturers, Social & Vocational Studies).
Paula Muir (Subject Leader, Hairdressing), Margaret McKay (Advisor: Accessibility and Inclusion, JISC RSC).
References
Bridgewater College. (2013) ‘iPads enhancing teaching and learning in the classroom’, JISC RSC, [online] Available at: http://www.jiscrsc.ac.uk/media/323918/sw56-pdf-version.pdf
Burden, K., et al. (2012) ‘iPad Scotland evaluation’, University of Hull, [online] Available at: http://www.janhylen.se/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/Skottland.pdf
Clarke, B., Svanaes, S. & Zimmermann, S. (2013) ‘One-to-one tablets in secondary schools: an evaluation study’, Tablets for Schools, [online] Available at: http://tabletsforschools.org.uk/ wp-content/uploads/2012/12/FKY-Tablets-for-Schools-Stage-2-Full-Report-July-2013.pdf
Clydebank College. (2012) ‘Amazing apps’, JISC RSC Scotland, [online] Available at: http:// www.rsc-sw-scotland.ac.uk/case_studies/docs/ClydebankAmazingApps.pdf
Derwen College. (2008) ‘Derwen College: trialling new technologies � video conferencing and JANET Txt for teaching, learning and student support’, Excellence Gateway, [online] Available at: http://archive.excellencegateway.org.uk/166795
Excellence Gateway. (2008) ‘Tracking success: an excellence gateway case study’, Excellence Gateway, [online] Available at: http://www.excellencegateway.org.uk/node/3470
GSMA. (2012) ‘Mobile education landscape report’, GSMA, [online] Available at: http://www. gsma.com/connectedliving/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/landscape110811interactive.pdf
JISC. (2005a) ‘Mobile learning and teaching with PDAs’, JISC, [online] Available at http:// www.elearning.ac.uk/innoprac/practitioner/resources/dewsbury.pdf
JISC. (2005b) ‘Multimedia learning with mobile phones’, JISC, [online] Available at http:// libweb.anglia.ac.uk/referencing/files/Harvard_referencing_2012.pdf
JISC. (2011) ‘Mobile learning infokit’, JISC, [online] Available at: http://www.jiscinfonet.ac. uk/infokits/mobile-learning/
Johnson, L., et al. (2013) ‘NMC Horizon Report: 2013 Higher Education Edition’, NMC, [online] Available at: http://www.nmc.org/publications/2013-horizon-report-higher-ed
Lius, E. (2011) An innovative approach to vocational learning environments, Global Learn, Melbourne, Australia, p. 1004.
Mobiilisti. (2012) ‘Mobiliisti: in English’, [online] Available at: http://www.mobiilisti.com/ mobiilisti---mobilearn
Northampton College. (2010) ‘Northampton College: learner voice and technology’, Excellence Gateway, [online] Available at: http://archive.excellencegateway.org.uk/page.aspx?o�298753
Research in Learning Technology
Citation: Research in Learning Technology 2014, 22: 22648 - http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v22.22648 13 (page number not for citation purpose)
Patten, B., Sánchez, I. A. & Tangney, B. (2006) ‘Designing collaborative, constructionist and contextual applications for handheld devices’, Computers and Education, vol. 46, no. 3, pp. 294�308.
Puentedura, R. (2009) ‘Transformation, technology, and education’, [online] Available at: http://hippasus.com/resources/tte/
Shuler, C. (2009) ‘Pockets of potential: using mobile technologies to promote children’s learning’, Joan Ganz Cooney Center, [online] Available at: http://www.joanganzcooney center.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/pockets_of_potential_1_.pdf
South Lanarkshire College. (2012) ‘The use of tablet PCs for e-assessment at South Lanarkshire College’, JISC RSC Scotland, [online] Available at: http://www.rsc-sw- scotland.ac.uk/case_studies/docs/SLanark_EnablingTechs.pdf
Wishart, J., & Green, D. (2010) ‘Identifying emerging issues in mobile learning in Higher and Further Education’, JISC, [online] Available at: http://www.bristol.ac.uk/education/ research/networks/mobile/publications/emergereport.pdf
Wu, W. H., et al. (2012) ‘Review of trends from mobile learning studies: a meta-analysis’, Computers and Education, vol. 59, no. 2, pp. 817�827.
Yorkshire Coast College. (2010) ‘Yorkshire Coast College: the educational impact of SMS on safeguarding and retention’, Excellence Gateway, [online] Available at: http://archive. excellencegateway.org.uk/page.aspx?o�272072
K. Fabian and D. MacLean
14 (page number not for citation purpose)
Citation: Research in Learning Technology 2014, 22: 22648 - http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v22.22648
Copyright of Research in Learning Technology is the property of Co-Action Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
