I have send you the question

Analysis 35 points maximum

Exemplary

(32–35 points)

Acceptable

(25–31 points)

Minimal Acceptance (0–24 points)

Analysis of topic includes doctoral-level thinking, as exemplified by rigorous assessment of topical themes and the systematic inclusion of required elements and content for the envisioned type of writing.

Analysis of topic includes sophisticated thinking, as exemplified by assessment of topical themes and the inclusion of required elements and content for the envisioned type of writing.

Analysis is superficial or is not thoroughly applied; themes and content are partially presented but are not assessed.

Formatting 15 points maximum

Exemplary

(13–15 points)

Acceptable

(11–12 points)

Minimal Acceptance (0–10 points)

Thoroughly follows the prescribed format for the type of academic writing, including structural elements and a logical flow of ideas. The deliverable represents an exemplary model for the type of writing envisioned.

Adheres to the prescribed format for the type of academic writing, including structural elements and a logical flow of ideas. The deliverable represents an acceptable model for the type of writing envisioned.

Does not fully follow the format of academic writing expected; lacks some structural elements, or ideas do not flow logically. Contains some deficiencies and does not serve as a viable model for the type of writing envisioned.

Adherence to Grammar and Style Guidelines

20 points maximum

Exemplary

(18–20 points)

Acceptable

(15–17 points)

Unacceptable

(0–14 points)

Clear, unambiguous writing that includes proper sentence structure, idea development, paragraph development, and grammar.

Relatively clear writing that includes proper sentence structure, reasonable idea and paragraph development, or few grammatical errors.

Unclear, poorly developed writing that lacks proper sentence structure and idea and paragraph development, or contains numerous grammatical errors.