Risk Management Project

HCM370: Portfolio Project Scoring Rubric

Criteria Meets Expectation Approaches Expectation Below Expectation Limited Evidence Content, Research, and Analysis 21-25 Points 16-20 Points 11-15 Points 6-10 Points Preliminary Deliverables

Delivered a bibliography in Week 4 as required.

Delivered a bibliography in Week 4 as required with some omissions or errors, or late.

Delivered a bibliography in Week 4 as required with a significant omission or error.

Did not deliver a bibliography in Week 4 as required.

29-35 Points 22-28 Points 15-21 Points 8-14 Points Requirements The Portfolio includes

all of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

The Portfolio includes most of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

The Portfolio includes some of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

The Portfolio includes few of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

29-35 Points 22-28 Points 15-21 Points 8-14 Points Content Demonstrates strong

or adequate knowledge of the materials; correctly represents knowledge from the readings and sources.

Some significant but not major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge.

Major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge.

Fails to demonstrate knowledge of the materials.

49-60 Points 37-48 Points 25-36 Points 13-24 Points Problem Solving Demonstrates strong

or adequate thought and insight in problem solving.

Some significant but not major errors or omissions in problem solving.

Major errors or omissions in problem solving.

Fails to demonstrate problem solving.

53-65 Points 40-52 Points 27-39 Points 14-26 Points Analysis Provides strong or

adequate thought, insight, and analysis of concepts and applications.

Some significant but not major errors or omissions in thought, insight, and analysis.

Major errors or omissions in thought, insight, and analysis.

Fails to demonstrate thought, insight, and analysis.

29-35 Points 22-28 Points 15-21 Points 8-14 Points Recommendations Recommendations for

risk management address all of the salient issues raised by the situation.

Recommendations for risk management address most, but not all, of the salient issues raised by the situation.

Recommendations for risk management address some of the salient issues raised by the situation.

Recommendations for risk management address few of the salient issues raised by the situation.

29-35 Points 22-28 Points 15-21 Points 8-14 Points Research and Findings

Cites and integrates at least six credible sources and details of research supporting the recommendation.

Cites and integrates four or five credible sources and details of research supporting the recommendation.

Cites and integrates two or three credible sources and details of research supporting the recommendation.

Cites and integrates no more than one credible source and details of research supporting the recommendation.

HCM370: Portfolio Project Scoring Rubric

Mechanics and Writing 17-20 Points 13-16 Points 9-12 Points 5-8 Points Organization Project is clearly

organized, well written, and in proper essay format including an introduction, body, and conclusion. Conforms to project requirements.

Small number of significant but not major flaws in organization and writing; is in proper essay format. In a minor way does not conform to project requirements.

Major problems in organization and writing; does not completely follow proper essay format. In a significant way does not conform to project requirements.

Project is not well organized or well written and is not in proper essay format. Does not conform to project requirements.

17-20 Points 13-16 Points 9-12 Points 5-8 Points Grammar and Style Strong sentence and

paragraph structure; few or no minor errors in grammar and spelling; appropriate writing style; clear and concise with no unsupported comments.

Small number of significant but not major errors in grammar and spelling; generally appropriate writing.

Inconsistent to inadequate sentence and paragraph development; work needed on grammar and spelling; does not meet program expectations.

Poor quality; unacceptable in terms of grammar and/or spelling; inappropriate writing style that interferes with clarity.

17-20 Points 13-16 Points 9-12 Points 5-8 Points APA Project contains

proper APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA Requirements, with no more than one significant error.

Few errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA Requirements, with no more than two to three significant errors.

Significant errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU- Global Guide to Writing and APA Requirements, with four to five significant errors.

Numerous errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA Requirements, with more than five significant errors.

Total points possible = 350