padm530_8wk_articlereviewrubric2...shaw4_.docx
PADM 530
Article Review Grading Rubric
|
Criteria
|
Novice
|
Competent
|
Proficient
|
|
Formatting
|
0 to 14 points
Review does not follow length requirements.
Essay is not formatted according to guidelines.
Poor grammar/spelling.
Formatting writing standards are not present.
|
15 to 19 points
The student’s review does not meet the proficient standards in all four categories, but the essay exceeds what would qualify it as novice.
|
20 to 25 points
The review meets the length and formatting requirements.
Complete citation is formatted correctly.
Grammar and spelling are correct.
Formatting writing standards are implemented throughout the essay.
|
|
Summary Content
|
0 to 14 points
Student's review is not clear or concise. It does
not demonstrate understanding or comprehension of the article.
|
15 to 19 points
The student’s summary contains superfluous information that does not reflect the ability to critically "weed-out" trivial content.
|
20 to 25 points
Each paragraph is written using clear and concise language.
Important details from the article are present, demonstrating comprehension.
|
|
Key Elements
|
0 to 14 points
The article does not provide the opportunity for biblical/ethical reflection.
The review does not interact with course material.
|
15 to 19 points
The student’s review does not cogently interact with the article provided.
The student forgets one of the key elements in the article review.
|
20 to 25 points
Provides the student with an opportunity to reflect on biblical/ethical issues associated with the article.
Discusses key elements in the review which are related back to the concepts within the course.
|
|
Total Points:
|
Mz Genuine
0
