Need help summarizing this power point

profilejoefra
surgery.2015.pptx

Appendicle abscess

Siedah Telesford MD

Dr. Griffith Team

History

CC: H.M. age 42 M p/w vomiting and diarrhea for 3 days.

HPI: Pt p/w vomiting and diarrhea for 3 days.

Pt was diagnosed with gastroenteritis at Arima General after 1 day of vomiting and diarrhea.

Pt admitted to diffuse abdominal pain x 2 weeks. Initially 5/10, took antiemetics and panadol had some relief for 1 day.

1 day later, abdominal pain got progressively worse, 8/10, diffuse, took panadol but no relief

42 yo M came to the ED with vomiting and diarrhea x3days. 2 week h/o diffuse abd pain. Diagnosed as gastro 2 days before admission. Pt had pain relief with antiemetics and panadol initially. Physical

2

History

Exacerbated by movement and cough

Vomiting (3/7) 2 episodes/day of food bilious, nonbloody

Anorexia

Diarrhea

Subjective Fever

Tenesmus – he described wanting to pass stool but unable to

Denies urinary symptoms

No trauma

PMHx: Denies

Medications: Denies

PSx: Denies

Allergies: NKDA

ROS- Noncontributory

Tenesmus

3

Physical Exam

General appearance: Young male in mild painful distress

V/s: P- 96 O2- 98 T- 36.4 RR- 24 BP- 131/67

Abdomen: +BS, Nondistended, firm

Tenderness in lower abd; ++RLQ , +rebound, +guarding

+Rovsing sign, -Obturator sign,+iliopsoas sign, -DRE

Respiratory: CTAB

CVS: RRR, S1/S2 heard.

Labs and ED course

WBC- 16.9 Hb- 12 Plt- 290

RFT, LFT, amylase, lipase, UA- WNL

CXR and AXR-WNL

ED course: Pt received

4mg Buscopan

50mg Gravol

50mg zantac

1L IVF NS

Imaging

Appendix measuring 1.6cm

4.5mm appendicolith within its tip

Small amount of free fluid in RIF

Fat stranding around appendix

5.1cm x 4.2cm collection with enhancing walls at tip of appendix

Fat stranding around the sigmoid colon

Working diagnosis: Appendicitis with appendicular abscess

Procedure

General anesthesia. Open lap and appendectomy. 24 French was left.

7

Post op

POD # 1

V/S: WNL

Intake: 2L RL/24 hrs

Urine output: 600 ml/24 hrs

J-vac: 100 ml

WBC 14.82

- Abd: +BS, distended, tenderness at incision site.

Post op

WBC: 14.8—>13.7—>12.6

Remained NPO, IVF, pain meds

Antibiotic tx with Flagyl and Zinacef for 8 days and removal of the drain on POD #7

Management of appendicitis with abscess or mass

Management of appendicitis presenting with abscess

In acute appendicitis patients, the proportion of cases associated with an abscess or a tumor in the periappendix has been reported to be approximately 2% to 7%.

3 approaches:

Emergency surgery

Early conservative treatments followed by elective surgery

Conservative treatments and follow-up observation only

If surgery is performed under the condition that inflammation due to appendicitis has spread to adjacent areas, the inflammation may have spread over a wide area. In addition, because of edema and the vulnerability of the adjacent small intestine and large intestine, secondary fistulas, etc., may have developed. In our case, there was inflammation of the sigmoid and rectum. For such cases, instead of completing surgery after a simple appendectomy, cases requiring a simultaneous iliocecectomy in areas with inflammation and adhesion or a right colectomy are not rare [68-12].

11

Management of appendicitis presenting with abscess

Approach A: Emergency surgery

The incidence of complications in emergency surgery is reported to be up to 26%

If surgery is performed under the condition that inflammation due to appendicitis has spread to adjacent areas, the inflammation may have spread over a wide area

Cases requiring a simultaneous iliocecectomy in areas with inflammation and adhesion or a right colectomy are not rare

Advantages:

Less frequent follow-ups and tests

Readmission for elective surgery

12

Management of appendicitis presenting with abscess

Approach B: Early conservative treatments followed by elective surgery

high success rates of 76% to 97%

incidence of complications in patients who underwent conservative managements was 15%,

With 58% in the group that underwent surgical treatments, 

Similarly, between the group that underwent interval surgery after conservative managements and the group that underwent emergency surgery. The incidence of postsurgical complications between the two groups was not different.

The purpose of delay in the interval appendectomy is to avoid the morbidity of immediate appendectomy in these patients while definitively treating the underlying appendicitis.

Why interval appendectomy?

Prevent recurrence of acute appendicitis

Avoid misdiagnosing alternative pathology eg malignancy

Advantages:

Safe

Eliminates risk of recurrent appendicitis and need for readmission for interval appendectomy

Reduces total hospital stay

Disadvantages:

Complication rate of 36%

Immediate surgery leads to dissemination of infection and intestinal fistula formation

13

Management of appendicitis presenting with abscess

Approach C: Observation

The recurrence rate of appendicitis in the group that underwent only observation without surgery after conservative management was 10%

Incidence of complications in patients who underwent conservative managements was 15%,

thus, intensive follow-up observation without interval surgery might be useful

- 12% were diagnosed as having different diseases, such as Crohn's disease, tumors etc

- Nonoperative treatment delayed the diagnosis of Crohn's disease and cancer in approximately 2 % of patients