|
Performance Outcomes Assessment Criteria
|
|
The student….
|
Advanced
20
|
Proficient
18
|
Basic
16
|
Minimal
14
|
Deficient
0
|
|
1. Selects a topic appropriate to the audience and occasion
|
Topic engages audience; topic is worthwhile, timely, and presents clear direction to the audience
|
Topic is appropriate to the audience and situation and provides some useful consideration to the audience
|
Topic is untimely or lacks originality; provides scant new information to audience
|
Topic is too trivial, too complex, or inappropriate for audience; topic not suitable for the situation
|
A single topic cannot be deduced
|
|
2. Formulates an introduction that orients audience to topic and speaker
|
Excellent attention getter; firmly establishes credibility; sound orientation to topic; clear thesis; preview of main points cogent and memorable
|
Good attention getter; generally establishes credibility; provides some orientation to topic; discernible thesis; previews main points
|
Attention getter is mundane; some-what develops credibility; awkwardly composed thesis; provides little direction for audience
|
Irrelevant opening; little attempt to build credibility; abrupt jump into body of speech; thesis and main points can be deduced but are not explicitly stated
|
No opening technique; no credibility statement; no background on topic; no thesis; no preview of points
|
|
3. Has an effective ARGUMENT “actionable” and is specific beyond the simple central idea; has support of outside credible sources
|
Very well developed; clear; effective
|
Developed, but leaves room for confusion
|
Simple and in need of specificity
|
Was only an informative idea; or a simple central idea
|
Did not develop
|
|
4. Successfully follows Motivated Sequence or Problem/Solution; has proper steps in correct form; very few audience disagreements
|
Exceeds expectations in this area
|
Meets required expectations in this area, but room for questions
|
Average or Basic, will need some re-thinking for the final presentation
|
Below expectations, not meeting all four categories or providing deep thought
|
Missed the directions entirely and did not complete all four components
|
|
5. Professionally communicates; FOLLOWS directions:
sentence outline, reference page in APA/MLA format
Conclusion: Re3
5+Sources!
|
Assignment is flawless with minimal errors of any kind
|
Mostly well-done; some issues with this requirement
|
Assignment could use some re-formatting for final presentation
|
Needs considerable work
|
Not professional
|
|
Comments (Not included in FIANL point value)
|
Things to work on
|
Argument Comments
|
Additional Comments
|
Things that ROCKED!
|
Final Score
_____/100
|