need help 7.2

points_77.docx

Home >Computer Science homework help >need help 7.2

Points: 80	Case Study 3: Carlson Companies
Criteria	Unacceptable Below 70% F	Fair 70-79% C	Proficient 80-89% B	Exemplary 90-100% A
1. Assess how the Carlson SAN approach would be implemented in todayâ€™s environment. Weight: 15%	Did not submit or incompletelyassessed how the Carlson SAN approach would be implemented in todayâ€™s environment.	Partiallyassessed how the Carlson SAN approach would be implemented in todayâ€™s environment.	Satisfactorilyassessed how the Carlson SAN approach would be implemented in todayâ€™s environment.	Thoroughlyassessed how the Carlson SAN approach would be implemented in todayâ€™s environment.
2. Compare the pros and cons of consolidating data on a SAN central data facility versus the dispersed arrangement it replaces. Weight: 15%	Did not submit or incompletelycompared the pros and cons of consolidating data on a SAN central data facility versus the dispersed arrangement it replaces.	Partiallycompared the pros and cons of consolidating data on a SAN central data facility versus the dispersed arrangement it replaces.	Satisfactorilycompared the pros and cons of consolidating data on a SAN central data facility versus the dispersed arrangement it replaces.	Thoroughlycompared the pros and cons of consolidating data on a SAN central data facility versus the dispersed arrangement it replaces.
3. Evaluate the issues raised from the Carlson SAN mixing equipment from a number of vendors and determine the management options for dealing with this type of situation. Weight: 15%	Did not submit or incompletelyevaluated the issues raised from the Carlson SAN mixing equipment from a number of vendors and did not submit or incompletely determined the management options for dealing with this type of situation.	Partiallyevaluated the issues raised from the Carlson SAN mixing equipment from a number of vendors and partially determined the management options for dealing with this type of situation.	Satisfactorilyevaluated the issues raised from the Carlson SAN mixing equipment from a number of vendors and satisfactorily determined the management options for dealing with this type of situation.	Thoroughlyevaluated the issues raised from the Carlson SAN mixing equipment from a number of vendors and thoroughly determined the management options for dealing with this type of situation.
4. Justify the reduction of administration and management of storage networking through Carlsonâ€™ s IP SAN. Weight: 15%	Did not submit or incompletelyjustified the reduction of administration and management of storage networking through Carlsonâ€™ s IP SAN.	Partially justified the reduction of administration and management of storage networking through Carlsonâ€™s IP SAN.	Satisfactorily justified the reduction of administration and management of storage networking through Carlsonâ€™s IP SAN.	Thoroughlyjustified the reduction of administration and management of storage networking through Carlsonâ€™s IP SAN.
5. Assess how cloud computing could be used by Carlson instead of a SAN. Create a diagram using Visio or its open source alternative software to illustrate the use of cloud computing. Weight: 25%	Did not submit or incompletelyassessed how cloud computing could be used by Carlson instead of a SAN and did not submit or incompletely created a diagram using Visio or its open source alternative software to illustrate the use of cloud computing.	Partially assessed how cloud computing could be used by Carlson instead of a SAN and partially created a diagram using Visio or its open source alternative software to illustrate the use of cloud computing.	Satisfactorily assessed how cloud computing could be used by Carlson instead of a SAN and satisfactorily created a diagram using Visio or its open source alternative software to illustrate the use of cloud computing.	Thoroughlyassessed how cloud computing could be used by Carlson instead of a SAN and thoroughly created a diagram using Visio or its open source alternative software to illustrate the use of cloud computing.
6. 3 references Weight: 5%	No references provided	Does not meet the required number of references; some or all references poor quality choices.	Meets number of required references; all references high quality choices.	Exceeds number of required references; all references high quality choices.
7. Clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements Weight: 10%	More than 6 errors present	5-6 errors present	3-4 errors present	0-2 errors present