Risk Management

HCM370 Critical Thinking Rubric – Module 3

Meets Expectation Approaches Expectation

Below Expectation Limited Evidence

Content, Research, and Analysis

9-10 Points 7-8 Points 5-6 Points 3-4 Points

Requirements The paper includes all of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

The paper includes most of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

The paper includes some of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

The paper includes few of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

13-15 Points 10-12 Points 7-9 Points 4-6 Points

Content Demonstrates strong or adequate knowledge of the materials; correctly represents knowledge from the readings and sources.

Some significant but not major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge.

Major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge.

Fails to demonstrate knowledge of the materials.

21-25 Points 16-20 Points 11-15 Points 6-10 Points

Critical Analysis Provides a strong critical analysis and interpretation of the information given.

Some significant but not major errors or omissions in analysis and interpretation.

Major errors or omissions in analysis and interpretation.

Fails to provide critical analysis and interpretation of the information given.

13-15 Points 10-12 Points 7-9 Points 4-6 Points

Application of Source Material

Sources well or adequately chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue; knowledge from the course linked properly to source material.

Some significant but not major problems with selection and linkage of sources.

Major problems with selection and linkage of sources.

Source selection is seriously flawed; no linkage to knowledge from the course.

9-10 Points 7-8 Points 5-6 Points 3-4 Points

Sources Cites and integrates at least 3 credible sources as specified in description.

Cites and integrates 2 credible sources as specified in description.

Cites and integrates 1 credible source as specified in description.

Cites and integrates no credible sources.

Mechanics and Writing

9-10 Points 7-8 Points 5-6 Points 3-4 Points

Demonstrates college-level

Project is clearly organized, well

Project is fairly well organized and

Project is poorly organized; does

Project is not organized or well

HCM370 Critical Thinking Rubric – Module 3

proficiency in organization, grammar, and style.

written, and in proper format as outlined in the assignment. Strong sentence and paragraph structure; few errors in grammar, spelling, or APA style.

written, and is in proper format as outlined in the assignment. Reasonably good sentence and paragraph structure; significant number of errors in grammar, spelling, or APA style.

not follow proper paper format. Inconsistent to inadequate sentence and paragraph development; numerous errors in grammar, spelling, or APA style.

written, and is not in proper paper format. Poor quality work; unacceptable in terms of grammar, spelling, and/or APA style.

9-10 Points 7-8 Points 5-6 Points 3-4 Points

Demonstrates proper use of APA style

Project contains proper APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA Requirements, with no more than one significant error.

Few errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA Requirements, with no more than two to three significant errors.

Significant errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA Requirements, with four to five significant errors.

Numerous errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA Requirements, with more than five significant errors.

Total points possible = 95