decision making 2

8/25/2015 Rubric Assessment ­ BMGT 317 6382 Decision Making (2158) ­ UMUC Learning Management System

https://learn.umuc.edu/d2l/lms/competencies/rubric/rubrics_assessment_results.d2l?ou=139278&evalObjectId=874869&evalObjectType=5&userId=1987&grou… 1/2

Rubric Name: Participation Rubric (30%)

Criteria Outstanding Superior Good Substandard

Evidence of critical

thinking (analysis,

synthesis, evaluation

and reflection) of class

reading material and

discussion

0.93 points

analysis, synthesis, evaluation and

reflection is strongly present across all

posts; rich in content full of thought, insight, and analysis (.93 - .85)

0.84 points

analysis, synthesis, evaluation and

reflection is present in most posts - substantial

information thought, insight, and analysis has taken place (.79 -

.88)

0.74 points

attempts analysis, synthesis, evaluation, and reflection but not

strongly evident or only partially evident -

generally competent information is thin and

commonplace (.69 - .78)

0.65 points

analysis, synthesis, evaluation, and

reflection is poorly demonstrated or does not exist; rudimentary

and superficial; no analysis or insight is displayed (0 - .68)

Responses to

classmates and

instructor reflect a

substantive

understanding of

course material

0.93 points

responses to instructor/classmates

are complete and meaningful as required; responses are relevant and advance the level

and depth of the discussion consistently using course material in the responses (.93 -

.85)

0.84 points

responses to instructor/classmates

are complete and meaningful as

required;  responses are relevant and advance the level and depth of

the discussion occasionally using the course material in the responses (.79 - .88)

0.74 points

responds to instructor/classmates

meet requirements but either a) responses lack some detail to explain answer; b) responses

do not add to the conversation;  c)

student does not use course material; d) student does not

respond to as many peers as required or e)

lacks consistency in responding to

others (.69 - .78)

0.65 points

fails to respond to classmates and/or

instructor as required; responses are

superficial (I agree statements, restating what other student

stated; response that evaluates the quality of a student's post adding

no substantial comment) (0 - .68)

Relevance of

participation to topic

under discussion

0.93 points

contributions are relevant and demonstrates outstanding

understanding of material; uses various

course material/resources in

responding, and consistently and accurately ties to activity (.93 - .85)

0.84 points

contributions are relevant and mostly demonstrates a good

understanding of material; uses some

course material/resources in

responding and attempts to ties to activity (.79 - .88)

0.74 points

contributions are somewhat relevant and

demonstrates some understanding of the material; rarely uses

course material/resources in

responses and occasionally ties to activity (.69 - .78)

0.65 points

contributions are off topic, distracting; does not use relevant course material/resources in

responses (0 - .68)

Writing mechanics and

APA usage

0.93 points

consistently uses grammatically correct

posts with no misspellings and no

APA style errors (.93 -

0.84 points

few grammatical or spelling errors are

noted in posts/ attempts in-text

citations and reference

0.74 points

errors in spelling and grammar evident; attempts in-text

citations or reference list but omits the other;

0.65 points

poor spelling and grammar in most posts;

no evidence of proofreading; no

attempt at APA (0 -

8/25/2015 Rubric Assessment ­ BMGT 317 6382 Decision Making (2158) ­ UMUC Learning Management System

https://learn.umuc.edu/d2l/lms/competencies/rubric/rubrics_assessment_results.d2l?ou=139278&evalObjectId=874869&evalObjectType=5&userId=1987&grou… 2/2

.85) list but errors are present (.79 - .88)

paraphrases or uses source material without

consistently citing/referencing (.69 -

.78)

.68) 

Overall Score Outstanding

3.38 or more

Superior

3 or more

Good

2.63 or more

Failure

0 or more