need help 5.2

profileJrasue
34.docx

StartFragment

Points: 80

Assignment 3: Elastic and Inelastic Traffic

Criteria

Unacceptable

Below 70% F

Fair

70-79% C

Proficient

80-89% B

Exemplary

90-100% A

1a. Outline a plan for the development of an addressing and naming model in an environment of ten departments in a 1,000-employee organization.

Weight: 10%

Did not submit or incompletely outlined a plan for the development of an addressing and naming model in an environment of ten departments in a 1,000-employee organization.

Partially outlined a plan for the development of an addressing and naming model in an environment of ten departments in a 1,000-employee organization.

Satisfactorily outlined a plan for the development of an addressing and naming model in an environment of ten departments in a 1,000-employee organization.

Thoroughly outlined a plan for the development of an addressing and naming model in an environment of ten departments in a 1,000-employee organization.

1b. Outline a plan for the development of an addressing and naming model in an environment of ten departments in a 1,000-employee organization.

Weight: 10%

Did not submit or incompletely outlined a plan for the development of an addressing and naming model in an environment of ten departments in a 1,000-employee organization.

Partially outlined a plan for the development of an addressing and naming model in an environment of ten departments in a 1,000-employee organization.

Satisfactorily outlined a plan for the development of an addressing and naming model in an environment of ten departments in a 1,000-employee organization.

Thoroughly outlined a plan for the development of an addressing and naming model in an environment of ten departments in a 1,000-employee organization.

1c. Outline a plan for the development of an addressing and naming model in an environment of ten departments in a 1,000-employee organization.

Weight:10%

Did not submit or incompletely outlined a plan for the development of an addressing and naming model in an environment of ten departments in a 1,000-employee organization.

Partially outlined a plan for the development of an addressing and naming model in an environment of ten departments in a 1,000-employee organization.

Satisfactorily outlined a plan for the development of an addressing and naming model in an environment of ten departments in a 1,000-employee organization.

Thoroughly outlined a plan for the development of an addressing and naming model in an environment of ten departments in a 1,000-employee organization.

2. Analyze the functional problems of throughput, delay, and packet loss as it pertains to your plan.
Weight: 15%

Did not submit or incompletely analyzed the functional problems of throughput, delay, and packet loss as it pertains to your plan.

Partially analyzed the functional problems of throughput, delay, and packet loss as it pertains to your plan.

Satisfactorily analyzed the functional problems of throughput, delay, and packet loss as it pertains to your plan.

Thoroughly analyzed the functional problems of throughput, delay, and packet loss as it pertains to your plan.

3. Analyze and explain how you would use DNS in your plan.

Weight: 15%

Did not submit or incompletely analyzed and explained how you would use DNS in your plan.

Partially analyzed and explained how you would use DNS in your plan.

Satisfactorily analyzed and explained how you would use DNS in your plan.

Thoroughly analyzed and explained how you would use DNS in your plan.

4. Compose a two-paragraph executive summary highlighting the main points of your plan.

Weight: 25%

Did not submit or incompletely composed a two-paragraph executive summary highlighting the main points of your plan.

Partially composed a two-paragraph executive summary highlighting the main points of your plan.

Satisfactorily composed a two-paragraph executive summary highlighting the main points of your plan.

Thoroughly composed a two-paragraph executive summary highlighting the main points of your plan.

5. 3 references

Weight: 5%

No references provided

Does not meet the required number of references; some or all references poor quality choices.

Meets number of required references; all references high quality choices.

Exceeds number of required references; all references high quality choices.

6. Clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements

Weight: 10%

More than 6 errors present

5-6 errors present

3-4 errors present

0-2 errors present