HEALTH

profilemimo_doll
quality_presentation.pptx

US Healthcare Delivery Systems Quality Outcome Measures

Donna Wilson, RN MPH MSJ CPHQ

Director, Quality Improvement/Patient Safety

Mount Sinai Beth Israel

History Pre- 1913

The godmother of quality was Florence Nightingale. She was a wealthy woman who went to work in the nurse corp during the Crimean war. She studied illness – the dysentery that the soldiers were getting.

She was the first one credited with thinking about washing hands, how close the beds were to one another and sharing needles.

2

EMERGENCE OF Continue Quality Improvement in Health Care

1913 - American College of Surgeons (ACS)- started to measure what we are doing and what difference it makes.

1918 - Hospital Standardization Program

1951 - Joint Commission on Accreditation of

Hospitals Organizations (JCAHO)-certifies 99% of hospitals

1963 – Corporate Liability introduced to Hospitals 1st lawsuit

1986 - Corporatization of medicine (HMO’s started, PPO’s)

1988 - Harvard Health Care Demo Project

Need for objective information on physician performance

Data on cost/ outcomes of medical care used by CMS

3

3

1913

First step toward improving quality care in American hospital. Developed minimal essential standards of care for hospital. Became the Hospital’s Standardization Program (HSP).

1951

HSP became JCAH - assumed responsibility for accreditation

Shift focus from structure to process

Increasing demand for availability of data on quality outcomes, and cost

1963

Hospital can be held accountable for failing to establish system of safe practices as defined by the industry.

EMERGENCE OF CQI IN HEALTH CARE

1990 - Introduction of TQM/CQI principles to hospital management by industry people

1999:Institute of Medicine (IOM) Report said that over 100,000 patients died from medical errors

Started Patient Safety

Transparency in Healthcare

Creation of Institute for Healthcare Quality (IHI)

2000 - CMS Core Measures

2006 – Pay for Performance

2009 – Present on Admission & Readmissions

4

4

70’s-80’s

Organization demanded data on cost, use patterns and practice patterns because such information was crucial in managing care in these systems. Essential to evaluating costs and quality of care.

TQM

Growing focus on using scientific methods. TQM was introduced to hospitals to change the way certain hospitals approached quality.

Physician Performance

For appointment and reappointment process

Cost and Out come

Medicare Prospective Payment System - Center for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS)

Continuous Quality Improvement

This term started in 1990s and started to look at quality on a continuum

We would say “ this is the problem” then we would collect data to see where we were weak and then come up with a solution

Then we would measure it ( the outcome) to see if what I put in place actually helped.

If it worked we move onto a different problem. If not, we tried a new solution

5

5

CQI came from Japan’s car industry

Toyota would look for the problems

Decide a solution

Measure it

6

1990

Everyone was blown away with the report that stated over 100,000 patient a year died unnecessarily from medical errors. And that reall started the focus on patient safety.

It was not just about falling out of bed.

It looked at how do we make sure patients don’t get infections or how do we make make sure that a diabetic is getting the right diet.

7

Measuring quality on a broad basis

Dr. Berwick in Boston created the Institute for Health Care Quality & Harvard University

They looked at what people had been measuring in 1990s and came up with Core Measures. It started out voluntary and is now what is known as Pay for Performance

No longer are hospitals paid if the person got worse.

8

Affordable Healthcare Act (2010)

Strengthen Medicare

Extend the Program through Cost Cuts

Reduce Payment for Errors, Waste, Fraud & Abuse

Improve Drug Coverage

Improve Patient Safety/Decrease Readmissions

Incentives for Improved Quality of Care

Affordable Healthcare Act (2010)

Decrease Health Disparities

Increase Preventive Care

Increased Coordination of Care

Diversity & Cultural Competency

Increase Access to Underserved Groups

Insurance Affordability/End Insurance Discrimination

Health Insurance Premium Hikes

States to Receive Federal Grants (NYS)

Expand Scope/Improve Review Process

Increase Transparency & Accessibility

Develop & Upgrade Technology

The New World Order Transparency Plus Payment Changes

Value Based Purchasing (VBP)

Hospital Acquired Conditions (HACs)

Readmission Penalties

Meaningful Use for IT Implementation

12

What is QUALITY?

Doing the right thing & doing it well

meeting or exceeding customer expectations

Minimizing adverse outcomes and medical errors

Good business

we can measure this by evaluating outcomes- through patient satisfaction surveys, benchmarking, etc

12

Definition of PI

Example: right patient, right test, done timely, meeting the needs of the patient

(patient c/o are valid, even though as staff we consider the patient to have had a good outcome)

How do we measure care?

What do we look at when we look at outcome?

13

WHY QUALITY?

Improve Patient Safety

Improve Patient Outcomes

Regulatory Requirements

Increase Customer Satisfaction

Increase Organizational Effectiveness

Lower Costs

13

Patient Safety - IOM Report 1999 - preventable errors; new patient safety standards 7/01

Patient Outcomes -e ffective Treatment - d/c status, re-admission, infection control

Regulatory - NYPORTS, JCAHO, Hospital report cards

Customer Satisfaction - patient centered customer more aware

Organizational Effectiveness - systems that work - rapid TAT lab and diagnostic testing

14

Meeting the Changes in Our Healthcare Environment

Why provide the best quality possible?

Value = Quality

Cost

14

Cost of quality falls into 4 categories:

1. Cost of prevention (training, team activities, community)

2. Cost if appraised (testing and inspection)

3. Cost of internal failure (waste, rework downtime, disruption)

4. Cost of external failure (patient goes elsewhere, litigation, ill will)

Car example

If the cost of the car is low but is not reliable and it doesn’t have good gas mileage, it might not be a good value

If you can get a good solid car – something that is safe, inexpensive and reliable – that’s value

15

Hospital example

If you can get a test done at hospital x and they do thousands of those and it cost more than hospital y and hospital y has more errors, it’s not value.

In the end we want the cost as low as we can get and then the determining factor is quality. If you can pay the lowest and get the best reputation and the best docs and workers and best equipment – you have gotten value

16

17

How do you achieve QUALITY?

Outcomes are achieved and customer requirements are met through processes

Quality can be ascertained by evaluating processes and/ or measuring outcomes

17

Process is a series of actions

Outcome - change in patient’s condition following treatment

What is Continuous Quality Improvement (CQI)?

The creation of organization-wide participation in examining, planning and implementing continuous improvements in the quality of care and services as defined by the customer

18

18

Evolution of Measurement

Structure

Policies & Procedures

Process

How to Achieve Workflow

Were You Efficient

Outcomes

What was the result

Were Your Policies Effective

Did Your Workflow Follow Policy

20

What is the Definition of Process?

A sequential series of actions that seek a desired outcome

Set of activities that occur daily within organizations

Includes all facets and people involved in a health care delivery system

20

Illustrate patient movement through system

�  �  �  �

21

What is the Definition of Outcome?

Clinical response to treatment

Desired result

Undesirable result

21

Change in patient’s condition following treatment

Desirable

Undesirable

22

How do we choose indicators?

According to high volume, high risk, problem prone procedures.

Required indicators set forth by regulatory agencies

Review of acceptable professional standards

Review of reliable benchmarking data that is available to us.

Overuse, under-use and misuse

22

High Volume Examples:

Cardiac Cath, Colonoscopy, CAP, CHF

Problem Prone Example:

Medication administration process

High Risk Procedures Example:

Brain Embolizations

Required indicators - immunizations, Care CAP, AMI patient, conscious sedation, use of restraints

Overuse, under-use and misuse Example

Use of Heparin/Coumadin

QI Program Annual Appraisal/ Assessment Areas of Evaluation

Adverse Occurrence/SE Trends

External Requirements (TJC,CMS,IPRO,DOH)

Current Performance Based on High Volume/High Risk/ Problem Prone

Publicly Reported Indicators/Core Measures/Value Based Purchasing

Benchmarking Data/ Best Practices

HCAHPS – Patient Satisfaction

Infection Prevention Initiatives

Joint Commission Required Data Collection

PI Priorities

Operative & Other Procedures

Tissue Review

Adverse Events Related To Moderate Sedation & Anesthesia

Use of Blood & Blood Products

Transfusion Reactions

Results of Resuscitation

Significant Medication Errors & Adverse Drug Reactions

Patient Perceptions of Care, Quality & Safety (HCAHPS)

Falls and Fall Reduction

RRT

Core (ORYX) Measures

Why standardize indicators?

Common Indicators

Internal

Ambulatory Network

Across Hospital Systems

External

CMS, DOH

, TJC, AHRQ, Q-HIP (Payers)

Outcome Data Example - NSQIP

CAUTI Prevention

Privileged and Confidential: Prepared in accordance with New York State Public Health Law 2805 j through m; New York State Education Law 6527; & Federal Law 109-4.

27

Improvement Achieved with:

Hand hygiene before and after patient contact

Use of PPE when handling Foley

Keeping drainage bag below bladder level

Improvement Still Needed with:

Securing Foley tubing to patient leg as per protocol

Valid orders in PRISM

27

CAUTI

Privileged and Confidential: Prepared in accordance with New York State Public Health Law 2805 j through m; New York State Education Law 6527; & Federal Law 109-4.

28

2013 National Prevention Target

25% reduction in CAUTI rate compared to 2009

SIR < 0.75

10% reduction in device utilization

100% adherence to indications for Foley catheter

SIR BIP = 0.3

SIR BIB = 0.3

THANK YOU !!!

29

Chart1

Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
Series 1
Time
% Compliance
Foley Catheter Maintenance Bundle Compliance
68
75
55
80
100
99

Sheet1

Series 1
Jul 68
Aug 75
Sep 55
Oct 80
Nov 100
Dec 99

Chart1

2009 2009 2009
2012 2012 2012
2013 2013 2013
BIP
BIB
NHSN
Rate per 1,000 Catheter Days
2.8
1.8
1.1
0.4
0.9
0.6
2.4

Sheet1

BIP BIB NHSN
2009 2.8 1.8
2012 1.1 0.4
2013 0.9 0.6 2.4
To resize chart data range, drag lower right corner of range.