The water, an indispensable resource for the survival of all species, exerts a decisive influence on the quality of living. However, the way water resources are used and managed has led to a level of environmental degradation and to a risk of water shortages that compromise the quality of life of future generations. The researchers say that the water issues in the twenty-first century is largely a management crisis rather a genuine crisis of stress and scarcity (Gleick, 2000). However, for other experts, it is a consequence of a number of ecological problems compounded with other problems related to economic as well as social expansion (Graff & Stroud 1-12). To Varis & Somlyody (2006), the aggravation and the involvedness of water predicament stem from actual availability as well as increased demand problems, and a process of further sectoral management and response to crises and problems without predictive attitude and systemic approach. Matsumura-Tundisi & Tundisi (2008) give emphasis to the need for an integrated, systemic as well as predictive approach to water management with decentralization to the watershed (Anderson, 2001). According to these authors, a consolidated database and transformed in management can be the most effective means to undertake the crisis of water shortage, water pressure as well as deteriorating quality. Considering the significance of the water crisis and its mismanagement, the researcher has chosen the issue of shortage of water supply in Lake Havasu City and associated risks to its water (Graff & Stroud 11).
The primary aim and objective of this research study is to evaluate the significance of water crisis in the Lake Havasu City, and to know the cause of this water supply management crisis. The researcher also has an objective to evaluate the risks associated to the lake water.
The water, an indispensable resource for the survival of all species, exerts a decisive influence on the quality of living. However, the way water resources are used and managed has led to a level of environmental degradation and to a risk of water shortages that compromise the quality of life of future generations (Westenburg et al., 2006. The case of Lake Havasu is also similar like other miss management of water reserve supply. This community living near the lake is positioned in the western Arizona, wherever supply of water is a main concern. Water reserve issues are mainly due the mismanagement of local government management team and planner of the city (Graff & Stroud 10-11).
The research work of Graff & Stroud (2010) has revealed different causes of shortage of water. Graff & Stroud (2010) point out that, in the wide social, environmental and economic twenty-first century, the main processes and problems are the major reasons of the “water crisis” are intense urbanization, growing demand of water, growing the expulsion of polluted water and with great demands for water supply and social and economic development (Graff & Stroud 2-4). One of the main reasons is stress and water scarcity in numerous parts of the world because of changes in the availability and increased demand (Kreamer19-29). Moreover, infrastructure and poor in critical condition in many urban areas up to 30% of losses on the network after the water treatment are also one of the main reasons. The research work of Graff & Stroud (2010) say that stress problems and shortages due to worldwide changes with tremendous hydrological events growing vulnerability of human population as well as affecting food security (heavy rains and drought intense period), and problems with lack of coordination as well as lack of constant actions in the governance of environmental sustainability and water resources (Roberts et al. 68-73).
This situate of issues has dimensions at the local, continental, regional, as well as planetary. These issues contribute to the exacerbation and increase of the causes of contamination, changing sources of water - springs - with scarcity as well as reduced availability. Moreover, increased susceptibility of human population because of contamination as well as difficult way in to fine quality water (treated and potable) (Wiele et al. 21).
This paper, while using a case of Lake Havasu City, reveals how pre-platted society is meeting a challenge of provision of a sufficient water supply on a regular basis for a fast increasing population in a tremendously dry environment, together with the crisis of management and infrastructure of water supply (Anderson 8).
The majority of Lake City’s ecological problems are frankly attributable to the McCulloch’s preference of site. Lake City is mainly susceptible to the flash floods, an issue that is hard to ease. In reality, flooding issues are overblown for the reason that the developers did not pursue the natural limits of this land (Beland et al., 1954). Even though, developments have been witnessed in the recent times, numerous homes are very close to the washes as well as drainage lines, and a lot of roads cross the washes without the bridges (Graff & Stroud 7-9).
Although infrequent flooding is common in the lake city but still the significant problem is the shortage of water in the city. The water shortage problem is a long term problem of the city. Water supply restrictions are mainly severe at Lake City for the reason that it resides in an unreceptive draw out of the desert, where the rainfall is negligible as well as temperatures are tremendously hot during the months of summer (City et al. 21). The average of rainfall is approximately 5 inches/year; furthermore summer temperatures frequently go beyond 115 degrees of F. This insensitive desert type of weather sustains merely widely spaced little shrubs as well as cacti (Graff & Stroud 6-9).
A standout amongst the most-important issues that must be tended to by city authorities was the sensational increment in the requirement for water to a great extent related with the lake city’s development (Janik et al. 19-21). Shockingly, the lake city’s whole water provision is constrained to a water assignment built up by Bureau of Reclamation for the utilization of the Colorado River water (Anderson 19). The City is distributed around 25,180 sections of land feet, or around 8.2 billion gallons, of the water each year.
Issues linked with supply are expected to rise as the demand for water keeps on growing, especially those urban communities encountering fast population development. Luckily, the immoderate pattern at Lake City portrays a slight decrease, especially since the year 2002. Eventually, the present level of utilization is a worry in perspective of restricted supplies and the proceeded with dry season that torment the area (Marsh &Papoulias 374-377). Projections show that water demand may surpass the momentum designation if Lake City keeps on encountering population development later on (Graff & Stroud 11-12).
Lake City procured McDonnell and Burns, a building firm, for help in managing their water reserve issues. In the year 1997, the organization helped create and start the usage of an all-inclusive strategy to supplant an interwoven of provincial septic tanks with present day clean sewers, and to diminish the nitrate levels that are saturating the groundwater. The firm additionally started take a shot at a structure intended to improve Lake Havasu City’s water supply. The city labored for a long time to introduce sewer lines and another, cutting edge sewer treatment plant to moderate the issues connected with water quality. At the point when the venture is done in the year 2011, more or less 90 % of the metropolis will be associated with a focal sewer framework, at an expense of around $423 million (Roberts et al. 68-73).
The Water Management Plan of the Lake City likewise incorporates essential methodologies to acquire extra water and endeavors to expand protection. Protection and reuse are to a great degree imperative on the grounds that the quantity of extra supplies or new wellsprings of water are in reality constrained. These endeavors, large portions of which are incorporated in the city’s arrangements for the future, will do much to move the city toward water asset manageability (Graff & Stroud 11-12).
This research of Roberts et al. (2004) reviews the research findings of ecological surveys to evaluate carbon monoxide exposure in Lake Havasu located in Arizona. The researcher has revealed that the travelers who are enjoying boating in Bridgewater canal of the Havasu Lake in 1997 up to 2002 are poisoning the lake city by Non Fatal and the fatal cases concerning the CO; pervasiveness of the reported symptoms among the municipal employees; and Concentration of carbon monoxide obtained during ambient air examining (Graff & Stroud 10-11). The researcher has also explored that during the period of February 1997 to August 2002, 2 fatal with 6 non-fatal different cases of the CO poisoning happened in travelers who were involved in boating nearly the Lake Havesu. Moreover, author also discloses that in 2003, a consulting firm also requested to review carbon monoxide exposure in the canal during the period of 23-26 May (Kreamer19-29).
The researcher has analyzed the discoveries of the studies, which recorded unnecessary carbon monoxide presentation and affirmed the health danger among representatives and vacationers working in waterway close swarmed speedboat social events (Graff & Stroud 4-6).
Luckily, Lake Havasu City has taken a dynamic part in lessening the excessive utilization of water. The most sensational diminishments in water utilization are thought to be an immediate aftereffect of evaluating structure updates and estimating increments. Before the presentation of the prolonged scale-rate structure, water was generally modest. All out utilization per capita started to decline somewhere around the years 2002 as well as 2003, and it kept on declining to more or less around 220 GPCD (per capita use in gallons every day) in the year 2008 (Anderson 5-7). This decline is ascribed to the aggregate impacts of the end of the McCulloch assembling plant (a previous client of a lot of water) and an estimating structure that charges higher rates as water utilization increase (Hanley & Brady 314-316). Luckily, private utilization, which is seventy percent of the city’s aggregate utilization, diminished to underneath 170 GPCD in 2004. Except for a slight increment in water use in 2006, levels at or beneath 170 gpcd proceeded through the year 2008 (Graff & Stroud 4-9).
At long last, the city has built up transient water protection objectives for the 5-year period from the year 2006 to the year 2010 (Graff & Stroud 2-9). The general objectives that stretched out through 2010 reveals to decrease the aggregate water utilization rate to between around 240-220 GPCD through the 5-year protection period, and also to implement the “Moderate the Flow” crusade. The objectives also emphasize to increase open attention to the water shortfall that Lake City will involvement in the impending years because of population development and anticipated Colorado River water deficiencies (Trammell et al. 68-73). Furthermore, emphasizes to reduce summer-season water utilization by ten percent or more (Graff & Stroud 3-7) and to target the private client bunch with particular projects intended to reduce general use.
This research has revealed the significance of making provision for the water supply inside pre-platted groups. Potential issues for the future incorporate challenging demands on effectively constrained supplies, the humiliation of existing wellsprings of supply from sudden pollution sources, or a significant ascent in the demand for water from quick population development. These and other potential issues highlight the significance of water reserves management and planning that incorporates assurance of existing sources and a continuous quest for new wellsprings of supply and inventive preservation strategies.
The circumstance at Lake City gives an evidence of the need to view water-asset issues in a provincial setting. This is amazingly critical on the grounds that population development in urban areas, for example, Las Vegas could affect water accessibility in the Lower Colorado Basin if more prominent volumes of water are occupied to upstream clients.
The seriousness of the circumstance is represented at Lake City, where inhabitants have couple of alternatives for getting new water if the stream of the Colorado River lessens, if the city surpasses its designation of 25, 180 section of land feet every year, or if the central government decreases the allotment to Lake Havasu City. As an intends to adapt to this intense circumstance, city authorities are attempting to get extra water rights, build water protection, and expand the utilization of recycled water. Since water supplies are so constrained, these endeavors and more are expected to guarantee sufficient water supplies later on.
Works Cited
Anderson, Bernard E. The socio-economic impacts of the Lake Havasu Fisheries Improvement Program.Anderson & Associates, 2001.pp. 1-9.
Baker, John R., and Larry J. Paulson. "The effects of limited food availability on the striped bass fishery in Lake Mead." (1983): 551.pp. 2-10.
Beland, R. D. "Report on the fishery of the Lower Colorado River: the Lake Havasu fishery." Calif. Dep. Fish (1954). pp. 5-11.
City, Lake Havasu. "General Plan 2002: Land Use Element, Lake Havasu City." Arizona. August (2002): 14.
Graff, Thomas O., and Hubert B. Stroud. "Water resource problems within pre-platted communities in the United States: the case of Lake Havasu City, Arizona." (2010). Pp. 1-12.
Hanley, Thomas A., and Ward W. Brady. "Feral burro impact on a Sonoran Desert range." Journal of Range Management (1977): 374-377.
Janik, Jeffrey John. "The role of nannoplankton in the phytoplankton dynamics of four Colorado River reservoirs (Lakes Powell, Mead, Mohave, and Havasu)." (1984).
Kreamer, David K. "The effect of the Central Arizona Project on the thermal structure of Lake Havasu." (1976).pp. 19-29.
Marsh, PAUL C., and D. Papoulias. "Ichthyoplankton of Lake Havasu, a Colorado River impoundment, Arizona-California." California Fish and Game75.2 (1989): 68-73.
Roberts, P., et al. "Carbon monoxide poisonings resulting from open air exposures to operating motorboats-Lake Havasu City, Arizona, 2003."Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report 53.15 (2004): 314-316.
Trammell, M., et al. "Humpback chub translocation to Havasu Creek, Grand Canyon National Park: implementation and monitoring plan." Natural Resource Report NPS/GRCA/NRR–2012/586. National Park Service, Fort Collins, CO. Available: h ttp://www. nature. nps. gov/publications/nrpm/nrr. cfm (2012).
Westenburg, Craig L., Don P. Harper, and Guy Andrew DeMeo.Evapotranspiration by Phreatophytes Along the Lower Colorado River at Havasu National Wildlife Refuge, Arizona. US Geological Survey, 2006.
Wiele, Stephen M., et al. Sediment transport in the Bill Williams River and turbidity in Lake Havasu during and following two high releases from Alamo Dam, Arizona, in 2005 and 2006. No. 2009-5195. US Geological Survey, 2009.