10 page essay double space on Psychological Considerations / Sociological
picwan
las432_project_rubrics.docx
Team Project Week 1
Topic and Outline
Group Grade
Team Name/Topic:
Group Members’ Names:
|
Includes a clearly stated thesis statement
|
/20 |
|
|
Outline has sufficient detail with at least 2 levels of headings. All sections have been included and assigned. |
/20 |
|
|
Spelling and grammar
|
/10 |
|
Please Note: I reserve the right to deduct points from individual team members for lack of participation, late participation, and/or quality of work that does not meet expectations. It is important to adhere to the deadlines your team agrees upon. If you submit after the time the team agrees upon, you may lose points or receive a zero.
Total Grade Points /50
Team Project – Week 2
Resource Review
Individual Grade
Student Name:
Graded element Points Comments
|
Minimum of 5 scholarly resources
|
/25 |
|
|
Correct use of APA formatting
|
/25 |
|
|
Clearly indicates how the resources support research in this section |
/25 |
|
|
Spelling and grammar
|
/15 |
|
Please Note: I reserve the right to deduct points from individual team members for lack of participation, late participation, and/or quality of work that does not meet expectations. It is important to adhere to the deadlines your team agrees upon. If you submit after the time the team agrees upon, you may lose points or receive a zero.
Total Grade Points /90
HUMN 432 Paper
INDIVIDUAL GRADING SHEET
STUDENT NAME: /200
Your contribution to the paper will be evaluated according to the complexity of the material, the thoroughness of your research, the quality of the analysis and synthesis of other course material, and your writing skills. I will look at how well your team covered off on all requirements and how your section fits into the overall project.
|
ELEMENT TO BE ASSESSED IN EACH SECTION |
MARK |
COMMENTS |
|
Organization of Material - central theme, arrangement and use of evidence and quotes, logic |
/40 |
|
|
Examination of Topic - comprehensiveness, connections, explanation of context/impact |
/40 |
|
|
Synthesis of material with course concepts and course readings (specific authors included) /quality of research |
/40 |
|
|
Bibliography and notes
|
/20 |
|
|
Format, spelling grammar |
/30 |
|
|
Completeness of overall report, all topics covered, fit with overall report (Group mark) |
/30 |
|
Please Note: I reserve the right to deduct points from individual team members for lack of participation, late participation, and/or quality of work that does not meet expectations. It is important to adhere to the deadlines your team agrees upon. If you submit after the time the team agrees upon, you may lose points or receive a zero.
LAS432 Final Project
Checklist of Elements to be Covered
Just a working checklist, not an outline!
|
Element
|
Research Paper Yes/No/Partially |
Presentation Yes/No/Partially |
|
Description of the technology and the associated science
|
|
|
|
Historical development and context, factors that drove the technology
|
|
|
|
Economic issues
|
|
|
|
Political/legal issues
|
|
|
|
Social/psychological
|
|
|
|
Cultural/artistic/film/literature
|
|
|
|
Moral/ethical
|
|
|
|
Environmental issues
|
|
|
Humn 432 Team Presentation Grade
|
Goal |
Excellent |
Very Good |
Good But Needs Improvement |
Does Not Meet Standards |
Points
|
Instructor Comments |
|
Team Work 25 points |
The group functioned exceptionally well. All members listened to, shared with and supported the efforts of each other. The group (all members) was always on task! (21-25) |
The group functioned very well. Most members listened to, shared with and supported the efforts of others. The group (all members) was almost always on task! (14-20) |
The group functioned fairly well but was dominated by one or two members and/or members were absent. (8-13) |
Some members of the group were often off task AND/OR were overtly disrespectful to others in the group AND/OR were disregarded by other group members. (0-7) |
|
|
|
Graphics 10 points |
Graphics included original material and were clearly related to the material being presented. (8-10) |
Graphics were clearly related to the material being presented, but only some were original. (6-7) |
Graphics included some original material but were only somewhat related to the material being presented. (4-5) |
Graphics were not original and not related to the material being presented. Or there were no graphics. (0-3) |
|
|
|
Oral Expression 25 points |
Spoke clearly and distinctly all of the time and mispronounced no words. (21-25) |
Spoke clearly and distinctly most of the time but sometimes mispronounced words. (14-20) |
Spoke clearly and distinctly some of the time but often mispronounced words. (8-13) |
Did NOT speak clearly and distinctly most of the time AND/OR consistently mispronounced words. (0-7) |
|
|
|
Research 90 points |
Group researched the subject and integrated ALL required elements from their research into their presentation. (77-90) |
Group researched the subject and integrated all but one required element from their research into their presentation. (68-76) |
Group researched the subject but only integrated two or three elements from their research into their presentation. (54-67) |
Very little content presented. Either no research was done or it was not clear that the group used it in the presentation. (0-53) |
|
|
Please Note: I reserve the right to deduct points from individual team members for lack of participation, late participation, and/or quality of work that does not meet expectations. It is important to adhere to the deadlines your team agrees upon. If you submit after the time the team agrees upon, you may lose points or receive a zero.
/150
