feedback.4,5
4- FEEDBACK
Autumn
A Due to Roskolnikov's mental illness, his "light punishment" does fit the crime that he committed. During Roskolnikov's trial, psychologists made it clear that Roskolnikov does suffer from mental illness and possibly more than one personality. Due to his mental instability, Roskolnikov can not be held accountable for a person that is sane. When a sick person, such as Roskolnikov, commits such horrific crimes or acts he possibly is not in the correct mind. This is why it is so pertinent that a psychologist become involved to do a full evaluation on the perpetrator to evaluate he/she if such crime was committed by a person with mental illness or a sane person. In the book, the psychologist made it evident that Roskolnikov does suffer from mental illness. It did state in the book that Roskolnikov was hospitalized at one point due to his illness so with that, continuous monitoring and the light sentencing, maybe the horrific acts of violence would not resurface again.
FEED BACK ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..
Daniel
The punishment that Roskolnikov received for the double murder did and, also did not fit the crime. In regards to getting eight years imprisonment is absolutely unjust and does not fit the the crime because one persons life should not only be worth four years imprisonment for that heinous act. Once Roskolnikov commits the murder his punishment has already begun. As we notice throughout the book he begins to push himself further and further away from people basically imprisoning himself. After the murder Roskolnikov lives his life in fear of the truth coming out. Living a life of fear from the truth will put you behind mental bars which will disconnect you from your sanity. The imprisonment of eight years again was not a just punishment but, living disconnected from humanity, hiding the truth, and living in fear is a forever lasting punishment that seems right for a person who believes that he has the right and power to take ones life.
FEEDBACK…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
Abdulla
The punishment for Raskolnikov does not fit the crime. He was given eight years behind bars only and regardless of the fact that he had confessed and turned himself in, he still had killed two innocent people through selfishness as shown in the decisive question as to what motive had impelled him to kill and rob “he answered very clearly with the coarsest frankness that the cause was his miserable position, his poverty and helplessness, and his desire to provide for his first steps in life by the help of the three thousand roubles he had reckoned on finding”. This was cowardly and shallow. It also encourages other murderers as all they would have to do is confess. He is still a conflicted man who has not sought any psychological help and could easily do it again as seen in his thoughts “Raskolnikov was so exhausted by what he had passed through that month that he could only decide such questions in one way; "then I shall kill him," he thought in cold despair”.
FEED BACK……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
FORM5
DISSCUSION
Autumn
1- The human race is attached to crime and punishment because it is in us to do sin. I like this thesis for my paper because I truly believe that since we were created that we have the capability of sin. Committing the unthinkable is in all of us. The question is, who will allow our own curiosity to get the best of us. I believe that this working thesis will be an argumentative subject and yet keep the audience attention. When crime is involved, the audience is usually attentive because again it is our own selves that have the capability of sin. Not everyone makes the choice of the unthinkable because of life, morals, consequences, and or just making good choices. I hope that I am able to use this as a working thesis and start my paper with a strong thesis. I am looking forward to criticism and comments.
FEEDBACK……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..
2 Anna
“Our conscience torments us when we behave in ways that are contrary to our values”.
Punishment is the inevitable consequence of crime. Every crime sooner or later will be detected and perpetrators will be punished. Nonetheless, punishment may help the criminal to transform and change his or her life to become a better human being. We all know already that Rascolnikov was sentenced to eight years of hard labor in Siberia. However, during that time his punishment let him undergo a deep life transformation. Rascolnikov faced not only rough camp conditions, but also his guilt. In other words, he was able to change as he did not lose his human conscience. Again, that might not be the case for every incarcerated criminal. Life in prison still obliges individuals to make choices either the right or wrong ones. Jim Quillen in his book Inside Alcatraz: My Time on the Rock presented a massive revolt with almost every prisoner participating. Obviously, the revolt was suppressed. Then it is evident that not every prisoner wishes to change his ways and use his or her punishment as a means to become a different man.
FEEDBACK……………………………………………………………………………..
………………………………………………………………………………………………..
In Crime and Punishment, Raskolnikov is mentally perturbed by guilt of his murder crime. His frenzied interaction with the outside world and his nihilistic world perspectives plays a role in his social alienation or the price of it. Raskolnikov committed murder with the idea that he possessed sufficient emotional and intellectual resilience to handle the outcomes; however, his sense of guilt soon overcomes him to the point of psychological and somatic illness. Subsequently, he realizes his formal punishment, having opted to confess and end his isolation from society.
FEEDBACK ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………