mangement

profileakiwent
case_study_1.0.pptx

Case Study 1

GROUP 2

Derek Yach, senior vice president for global health policy

at PepsiCo, is assembling a team of “idealistic scientists

to find alternatives to Doritos.”These physicians and

researchers with doctorate degrees, many of whom have

built their reputations at places like the Mayo Clinic, the

World Health Organization, and like-minded organizations,

are tasked with creating healthier options by “making the

bad stuff less bad.” (p. 367)

Suppose that you were put in charge of

this elite team. How would you lead it?

THE CASE STUDY:

Structured around GROUP EFFORT

Have group LEADERS and STATUS

Have each group be designed a specific TASK. (I.E: Health Statistics, Differences in Doritos versus other chips, etc)

Give each group a different set of goals

Use GROUP DECISION MAKING for all the decisions we make

Group SIZE affects performance and satisfaction

Small groups are faster at completing tasks than are larger ones

Work will be decided on together

Mostly using TASK GROUPS - groups will have a specific job.

We will then have CROSS-FUNCTIONING TEAMS - we will bring together skills and research from all the groups and have discussion on each days developments

We will EVALUATE the research and developments of the day to make SPECIFIC PLANS for the next day

Have a DISCUSSION with each team at the end of the day to see what they

struggled with.

performance and satisfaction

TEAMWORK

Group 1:

Find which ingredients are causing the most harm in the human body

Identify the decision criteria of ingredients and allocate weights to the criteria

Find out what is the most harmful aspects of doritos

Group 2

Find and develop alternative ingredients to replace the most problematic ingredients and then analyze it.

Focus Specifically on: lowering calories, fat content, carbs, and sodium without diminishing the taste.

Group 3

Decipher and analyze the information from the first two groups

Select alternatives and implement those for evaluation

What Would Our Groups Do?

What did you accomplish?

What are the health benefits of any current developments?

What changes need to be made?

How can we execute those changes in a proficient manner?

What could we do differently tomorrow to make sure that we are working efficiently?

Is your team working well together? why or why not?

END OF THE DAY QUESTIONS?

Group: two or more interacting interdependent individuals who come together to achieve specific goals

Leaders: someone who can influence others and who has managerial authority

Status: a prestige grading, position, or rank within a group

Task: work that is done or undertaken

Group Decision Making: individuals collectively make a choice from the alternatives before them

Size: affects performance and satisfaction, but the effect depends on what the group is supposed to accomplish. Research indicates, for instance, that small groups are faster at completing tasks than are larger ones

Task - Groups: groups composed of individuals brought together to complete a specific job or task- their existence is often temporary because when the task is completed, the group disbands

Cross Functioning teams: groups that bring together the knowledge and skills of individuals from various work areas or groups whose members have been trained to do each others’ jobs.

Specific Plans: plans that are clearly defined and leave no room for interpretation

Evaluate: form an idea of the amount, number, or value of

Discussion: the act of talking about something with another person or a group of people

Golden Terms

Are there any terms that were new to you?

Would you guys handle the situation differently than any of our group members did?

Discussion Questions

Michael Scott’s Advice to You

Jaycee Levin Noura Boustany Jost

Robert Prindle Courtney Jankowski

Hyun Kang

Our Group Members: