takes second part of essay and topic 3-4 Defense of the parties and Documents of the plantiffs side will ask for and how they will be used

profilegengri
u9_case_study__rubric.docx

MN 506 - Unit 9: Scoring Rubric

Legal Malpractice Case Group Paper

 [300 points total-230 for group paper; 40 for individual participation & 30 APA & grammar]

Requirements

Unsatisfactory Does Not Meet Requirements

0-4 points

Underdeveloped/Limited-Meets Some Requirements

5-11 points

Satisfactory

12- 19 points

Exceptional Meet Requirements

20 points

Total Points

Liability issues

The assignment does not address any or all of this section.

The assignment contains some information on this area of focus, but needs more clarity. Topic needs to be developed more thoroughly.

Entry well-constructed and demonstrated basic connection to the course materials, the required topic and/or upper-level thinking (application or analysis).

Group project demonstrates substantial integration of course materials and/or use of upper level thinking (legal synthesis of malpractice case).

 

Parties involved and who should be sued

The assignment does not address any or all of this section.

The assignment contains some information on this area of focus, but needs more clarity. Topic needs to be developed more thoroughly.

Entry well-constructed and demonstrated basic connection to the course materials, the required topic and/or upper-level thinking (application or analysis).

Group project demonstrates substantial integration of course materials and/or use of upper level thinking (legal synthesis of malpractice case).

Defenses of the parties

The assignment does not address any or all of this section.

The assignment contains some information on this area of focus, but needs more clarity. Topic needs to be developed more thoroughly.

Entry well-constructed and demonstrated basic connection to the course materials, the required topic and/or upper-level thinking (application or analysis).

Group project demonstrates substantial integration of course materials and/or use of upper level thinking (legal synthesis of malpractice case).

Documents that the Plaintiff’s side will ask for and how they will be used

The assignment does not address any or all of this section.

The assignment contains some information on this area of focus, but needs more clarity. Topic needs to be developed more thoroughly.

Entry well-constructed and demonstrated basic connection to the course materials, the required topic and/or upper-level thinking (application or analysis).

Group project demonstrates substantial integration of course materials and/or use of upper level thinking (legal synthesis of malpractice case).

Standards of care

The assignment does not address any or all of this section.

The assignment contains some information on this area of focus, but needs more clarity. Topic needs to be developed more thoroughly.

Entry well-constructed and demonstrated basic connection to the course materials, the required topic and/or upper-level thinking (application or analysis).

Group project demonstrates substantial integration of course materials and/or use of upper level thinking (legal synthesis of malpractice case).

Duty, breach, damages and proximate cause

The assignment does not address any or all of this section.

The assignment contains some information on this area of focus, but needs more clarity. Topic needs to be developed more thoroughly.

Entry well-constructed and demonstrated basic connection to the course materials, the required topic and/or upper-level thinking (application or analysis).

Group project demonstrates substantial integration of course materials and/or use of upper level thinking (legal synthesis of malpractice case).

Insurance issues

The assignment does not address any or all of this section.

The assignment contains some information on this area of focus, but needs more clarity. Topic needs to be developed more thoroughly.

Entry well-constructed and demonstrated basic connection to the course materials, the required topic and/or upper-level thinking (application or analysis).

Group project demonstrates substantial integration of course materials and/or use of upper level thinking (legal synthesis of malpractice case).

Risk management issues before and after the incident

The assignment does not address any or all of this section.

The assignment contains some information on this area of focus, but needs more clarity. Topic needs to be developed more thoroughly.

Entry well-constructed and demonstrated basic connection to the course materials, the required topic and/or upper-level thinking (application or analysis).

Group project demonstrates substantial integration of course materials and/or use of upper level thinking (legal synthesis of malpractice case).

Documentation and mandatory reporting

The assignment does not address any or all of this section.

The assignment contains some information on this area of focus, but needs more clarity. Topic needs to be developed more thoroughly.

Entry well-constructed and demonstrated basic connection to the course materials, the required topic and/or upper-level thinking (application or analysis).

Group project demonstrates substantial integration of course materials and/or use of upper level thinking (legal synthesis of malpractice case).

Who should write the incident report and what should it say?

The assignment does not address any or all of this section.

The assignment contains some information on this area of focus, but needs more clarity. Topic needs to be developed more thoroughly.

Entry well-constructed and demonstrated basic connection to the course materials, the required topic and/or upper-level thinking (application or analysis).

Group project demonstrates substantial integration of course materials and/or use of upper level thinking (legal synthesis of malpractice case).

The doctrine of Respondeat Superior and how it would apply

The assignment does not address any or all of this section.

The assignment contains some information on this area of focus, but needs more clarity. Topic needs to be developed more thoroughly.

Entry well-constructed and demonstrated basic connection to the course materials, the required topic and/or upper-level thinking (application or analysis).

Group project demonstrates substantial integration of course materials and/or use of upper level thinking (legal synthesis of malpractice case).

The issues surrounding informed consent

The assignment does not address any or all of this section.

The assignment contains some information on this area of focus, but needs more clarity. Topic needs to be developed more thoroughly.

Entry well-constructed and demonstrated basic connection to the course materials, the required topic and/or upper-level thinking (application or analysis).

Group project demonstrates substantial integration of course materials and/or use of upper level thinking (legal synthesis of malpractice case).

Preparation for court of the parties

The assignment does not address any or all of this section.

The assignment contains some information on this area of focus, but needs more clarity. Topic needs to be developed more thoroughly.

Entry well-constructed and demonstrated basic connection to the course materials, the required topic and/or upper-level thinking (application or analysis).

Group project demonstrates substantial integration of course materials and/or use of upper level thinking (legal synthesis of malpractice case).

Individual points for group work Requirements

Unsatisfactory Does Not Meet Requirements

0 points

Underdeveloped/Limited-Meets Some Requirements

5 points

Satisfactory

8 points

Exceptional Meet Requirements

10 points

Total Points

Cooperates with group. Assists with assignments, makes meetings, contributes to the paper and works to further the interests of the group.

Does not cooperate with the group or does not participate.

Participates but does not put full efforts in or is disruptive to the group.

Participates in group process.

Exceptional Meet Requirements.

B. Format

(15 points possible)

Unsatisfactory 0 poin1ts

Underdeveloped/Limited

4 point

Satisfactory

6 points

Exceptional

10 points

APA Format

There are >4 errors with APA format.

There are 3-4 errors with APA format.

There are 1-2 errors with APA format.

There are no errors with APA format.

Citations

There are no references/citations.

Student appeals only to his/her own experiences to support main point.

There is one reference/citation. Student incorporates the work/experiences of other students, scholars.

There are 2+ references/citations. Student supports main position with references to scholarly articles, course readings, and experts.

Spelling/Grammar

There are > 4 errors with spelling/grammar.

There are 3-4 errors with spelling/grammar.

There are 1-2 errors with spelling/grammar.

There are no errors with spelling/grammar.

Total raw points earned on Part B (format)

___/30

Total Points: (A +B +C) /300

___/300 points