takes second part of essay and topic 3-4 Defense of the parties and Documents of the plantiffs side will ask for and how they will be used
MN 506 - Unit 9: Scoring Rubric
Legal Malpractice Case Group Paper
[300 points total-230 for group paper; 40 for individual participation & 30 APA & grammar]
|
Requirements |
Unsatisfactory Does Not Meet Requirements 0-4 points |
Underdeveloped/Limited-Meets Some Requirements 5-11 points
|
Satisfactory
12- 19 points |
Exceptional Meet Requirements 20 points |
Total Points |
|
Liability issues
|
The assignment does not address any or all of this section. |
The assignment contains some information on this area of focus, but needs more clarity. Topic needs to be developed more thoroughly. |
Entry well-constructed and demonstrated basic connection to the course materials, the required topic and/or upper-level thinking (application or analysis). |
Group project demonstrates substantial integration of course materials and/or use of upper level thinking (legal synthesis of malpractice case).
|
|
|
Parties involved and who should be sued |
The assignment does not address any or all of this section. |
The assignment contains some information on this area of focus, but needs more clarity. Topic needs to be developed more thoroughly. |
Entry well-constructed and demonstrated basic connection to the course materials, the required topic and/or upper-level thinking (application or analysis). |
Group project demonstrates substantial integration of course materials and/or use of upper level thinking (legal synthesis of malpractice case).
|
|
|
Defenses of the parties |
The assignment does not address any or all of this section. |
The assignment contains some information on this area of focus, but needs more clarity. Topic needs to be developed more thoroughly. |
Entry well-constructed and demonstrated basic connection to the course materials, the required topic and/or upper-level thinking (application or analysis). |
Group project demonstrates substantial integration of course materials and/or use of upper level thinking (legal synthesis of malpractice case).
|
|
|
Documents that the Plaintiff’s side will ask for and how they will be used |
The assignment does not address any or all of this section. |
The assignment contains some information on this area of focus, but needs more clarity. Topic needs to be developed more thoroughly. |
Entry well-constructed and demonstrated basic connection to the course materials, the required topic and/or upper-level thinking (application or analysis). |
Group project demonstrates substantial integration of course materials and/or use of upper level thinking (legal synthesis of malpractice case).
|
|
|
Standards of care |
The assignment does not address any or all of this section. |
The assignment contains some information on this area of focus, but needs more clarity. Topic needs to be developed more thoroughly. |
Entry well-constructed and demonstrated basic connection to the course materials, the required topic and/or upper-level thinking (application or analysis). |
Group project demonstrates substantial integration of course materials and/or use of upper level thinking (legal synthesis of malpractice case).
|
|
|
Duty, breach, damages and proximate cause |
The assignment does not address any or all of this section. |
The assignment contains some information on this area of focus, but needs more clarity. Topic needs to be developed more thoroughly. |
Entry well-constructed and demonstrated basic connection to the course materials, the required topic and/or upper-level thinking (application or analysis). |
Group project demonstrates substantial integration of course materials and/or use of upper level thinking (legal synthesis of malpractice case).
|
|
|
Insurance issues |
The assignment does not address any or all of this section. |
The assignment contains some information on this area of focus, but needs more clarity. Topic needs to be developed more thoroughly. |
Entry well-constructed and demonstrated basic connection to the course materials, the required topic and/or upper-level thinking (application or analysis). |
Group project demonstrates substantial integration of course materials and/or use of upper level thinking (legal synthesis of malpractice case).
|
|
|
Risk management issues before and after the incident |
The assignment does not address any or all of this section. |
The assignment contains some information on this area of focus, but needs more clarity. Topic needs to be developed more thoroughly. |
Entry well-constructed and demonstrated basic connection to the course materials, the required topic and/or upper-level thinking (application or analysis). |
Group project demonstrates substantial integration of course materials and/or use of upper level thinking (legal synthesis of malpractice case).
|
|
|
Documentation and mandatory reporting |
The assignment does not address any or all of this section. |
The assignment contains some information on this area of focus, but needs more clarity. Topic needs to be developed more thoroughly. |
Entry well-constructed and demonstrated basic connection to the course materials, the required topic and/or upper-level thinking (application or analysis). |
Group project demonstrates substantial integration of course materials and/or use of upper level thinking (legal synthesis of malpractice case).
|
|
|
Who should write the incident report and what should it say? |
The assignment does not address any or all of this section. |
The assignment contains some information on this area of focus, but needs more clarity. Topic needs to be developed more thoroughly. |
Entry well-constructed and demonstrated basic connection to the course materials, the required topic and/or upper-level thinking (application or analysis). |
Group project demonstrates substantial integration of course materials and/or use of upper level thinking (legal synthesis of malpractice case).
|
|
|
The doctrine of Respondeat Superior and how it would apply |
The assignment does not address any or all of this section. |
The assignment contains some information on this area of focus, but needs more clarity. Topic needs to be developed more thoroughly. |
Entry well-constructed and demonstrated basic connection to the course materials, the required topic and/or upper-level thinking (application or analysis). |
Group project demonstrates substantial integration of course materials and/or use of upper level thinking (legal synthesis of malpractice case).
|
|
|
The issues surrounding informed consent |
The assignment does not address any or all of this section. |
The assignment contains some information on this area of focus, but needs more clarity. Topic needs to be developed more thoroughly. |
Entry well-constructed and demonstrated basic connection to the course materials, the required topic and/or upper-level thinking (application or analysis). |
Group project demonstrates substantial integration of course materials and/or use of upper level thinking (legal synthesis of malpractice case).
|
|
|
Preparation for court of the parties |
The assignment does not address any or all of this section. |
The assignment contains some information on this area of focus, but needs more clarity. Topic needs to be developed more thoroughly. |
Entry well-constructed and demonstrated basic connection to the course materials, the required topic and/or upper-level thinking (application or analysis). |
Group project demonstrates substantial integration of course materials and/or use of upper level thinking (legal synthesis of malpractice case).
|
|
|
Individual points for group work Requirements |
Unsatisfactory Does Not Meet Requirements 0 points |
Underdeveloped/Limited-Meets Some Requirements 5 points
|
Satisfactory
8 points |
Exceptional Meet Requirements 10 points |
Total Points |
|
Cooperates with group. Assists with assignments, makes meetings, contributes to the paper and works to further the interests of the group. |
Does not cooperate with the group or does not participate.
|
Participates but does not put full efforts in or is disruptive to the group.
|
Participates in group process.
|
Exceptional Meet Requirements.
|
|
|
B. Format (15 points possible) |
Unsatisfactory 0 poin1ts |
Underdeveloped/Limited 4 point |
Satisfactory 6 points |
Exceptional 10 points |
|
|
APA Format |
There are >4 errors with APA format. |
There are 3-4 errors with APA format. |
There are 1-2 errors with APA format. |
There are no errors with APA format. |
|
|
Citations |
There are no references/citations. |
Student appeals only to his/her own experiences to support main point. |
There is one reference/citation. Student incorporates the work/experiences of other students, scholars. |
There are 2+ references/citations. Student supports main position with references to scholarly articles, course readings, and experts. |
|
|
Spelling/Grammar |
There are > 4 errors with spelling/grammar. |
There are 3-4 errors with spelling/grammar. |
There are 1-2 errors with spelling/grammar. |
There are no errors with spelling/grammar. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total raw points earned on Part B (format) |
___/30 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total Points: (A +B +C) /300 |
___/300 points |