research paper 700-800 words
Health Services Administration Assignment Grading Rubric
|
Component: Content |
Unacceptable
|
Marginally Meets Expectations |
Meets Expectations
|
Exceeds Expectations
|
Maximum Points |
Points Earned |
|
Demonstrates accurate understanding and synthesis of assignment concepts by: · Meeting content standards · Identifying relevant points and main ideas that are organized and complete · Providing accurate and relevant information highlighting an understanding of material · Demonstrating original thought and personal reflection in relation to the concepts · Providing evidence to support thoughts, comments and opinions (e.g., source citations) |
· Content does not meet assignment standards · Information provided was inaccurate · Information presented in disorganized manner · Information presented in an incomplete manner · Demonstrates limited understanding of the material · No supportive evidence provided · Provides insufficient peer-reviewed resources (citations and references) · Demonstrates limited or no original thought and/or reflection |
· Content marginally meets assignment standards · Information presented was generally accurate · Information presented is minimally developed · Content presented in a disorganized manner · Information presented demonstrates only partial understanding of the material · Information is insufficiently supported with up-to-date, peer-reviewed resources · Demonstrates some original thought and/or reflection |
· Content sufficiently meets all assignment standards · Information presented is accurate · Information presented is adequately developed · Content presented is organized · Information presented demonstrates an adequate understanding of the material · Information is adequately supported with up-to-date, peer reviewed resources · Demonstrates original thought and reflection |
· Content exceeds all assignment standards · Information presented exceeds expectations of upper division course work · Information presented is well developed · Content presented is exceptionally well organized and comprehensive · Information presented demonstrates thorough understanding and application of the material · Information is thoroughly supported with up-to-date, peer reviewed resources · Demonstrates original thought and insightful connections |
14 |
|
|
Component: Professionalism |
Unacceptable |
Marginally Meets Expectations |
Meets Expectations |
Exceeds Expectations |
Maximum Points |
Points Earned |
|
Demonstrates a commitment to academic integrity and professional standards by: · Meeting all assignment requirements completely · Maintaining academic integrity · Applying instructor feedback, when appropriate · Submitting work that is accurate and reflective of upper level scholarly expectations · Using professional language and terminology · Submitting work on time |
· Assignment requirements were not met · Did not adhere to principles of academic integrity · Work does not reflect correction of errors previously noted by instructor · Excessive errors in grammar, spelling, punctuation, and/or APA · Excessive use of unprofessional language, terminology or abbreviations (i.e. texting) |
· Key requirements of the assignment were missing · Adhered to principles of academic integrity · Works reflects only minimal correction of errors previously noted by instructor · Numerous errors in grammar, spelling, punctuation, and/or APA · Some use of unprofessional language, terminology or abbreviations (i.e. texting) |
· Key requirements of the assignment were met · Adhered to principles of academic integrity · Works reflects correction of the majority of errors previously noted by instructor · Minimal errors in grammar, spelling, punctuation, and/or APA · Language and terminology is professional and appropriate |
· Key requirements of the assignment were met · Adhered to principles of academic integrity · Works reflects correction of all errors previously noted by instructor · Accuracy with grammar, spelling, punctuation, and/or APA · Exceptional use of professional language and terminology |
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Points |
20 |
|
|
Instructor Feedback |
|
Special Disclaimers:
· 1 point deduction for failure to use standard HSA file naming convention: course_assignment_lastname (i.e. HSA3104_timeline_smith)
· 1 point deduction for failure to include the assignment rubric.
Abbreviated Late HSA Policy, please see your course syllabus for the full late policy:
· Assignments submitted within 24 hours of due date – 50% deduction (graded score – 50%).
· Assignments submitted after 24 hours are not accepted for credit.
Academic Integrity: