Grading Rubric
Please refer to the rubric below for the grading criteria for this assignment.
![]()
Discussion Question 5-2
What is resource leveling with a project plan? Discuss the internal post project evaluation process and the two types of meetings involved. What are some ways you can obtain feedback from a customer after a project has been completed? How would you use this information? (A 2-page response is required.)
Grading Rubric
Please refer to the rubric on the following page for the grading criteria for this assignment.
![]()
CATEGORYExemplarySatisfactoryUnsatisfactoryUnacceptable
15 points 10 points 8 points 6 points
Student provides a clear,
logical discussion of what
needs to be done to manage
risk on a project.
Student provides a mostly
clear, logical discussion of
what needs to be done to
manage risk on a project.
Student provides a partially
clear, logical discussion of what
needs to be done to manage
risk on a project.
Student provides a weak, unclear
or incomplete discussion of what
needs to be done to manage risk
on a project.
15 points 10 points 8 points 6 points
Student provides a clear,
logical discussion of how a
risk assessment matrix can
help manage risk.
Student provides a mostly
clear, logical discussion of
how a risk assessment matrix
can help manage risk.
Student provides a partially
clear, logical discussion of how a
risk assessment matrix can help
manage risk.
Student provides a weak, unclear
or incomplete discussion of how
a risk assessment matrix can help
manage risk.
15 points 10 points 8 points 6 points
Student provides a clear,
logical discussion of the
priority for a risk change as
the project progresses.
Student provides a mostly
clear, logical discussion of the
priority for a risk change as
the project progresses.
Student provides a partially
clear, logical discussion of the
priority for a risk change as the
project progresses.
Student provides a weak, unclear
or incomplete discussion of the
priority for a risk change as the
project progresses.
2 points 1.5 points 1 point.5 point
Student makes no errors in
grammar or spelling that
distract the reader from the
content.
Student makes 1-2 errors in
grammar or spelling that
distract the reader from the
content.
Student makes 3-4 errors in
grammar or spelling that distract
the reader from the content.
Student makes more than 4
errors in grammar or spelling that
distract the reader from the
content.
3 points 2 points 1 point.5 point
The paper is written in proper
format. All sources used for
quotes and facts are credible
and cited correctly. Excellent
organization, including a
variety of thoughtful
transitions.
The paper is written in proper
format with only 1-2 errors.
All sources used for quotes
and facts are credible and
most are cited correctly.
Adequate organization
includes a variety of
appropriate transitions.
The paper is written in proper
format with only 3-5 errors.
Most sources used for quotes
and facts are credible and cited
correctly. Essay is poorly
organized, but may include a
few effective transitions.
The paper is not written in proper
format. Many sources used for
quotes and facts are less than
credible (suspect) and/or are not
cited correctly. Essay is
disorganized and does not
include effective transitions.
Mechanics -Grammar,
Punctuation, Spelling
(2 Points)
Format - APA Format,
Citations, Organization,
Transitions (3 Points)
Manage Risk (15 Points)
Priority for a Risk
Change (15 Points)
Risk Assessment Matrix
(15 Points)
CATEGORYExemplarySatisfactoryUnsatisfactoryUnacceptable
15 points 10 points 8 points 6 points
Student provides a clear,
logical definition of
resource leveling.
Student provides a mostly
clear, logical definition of
resource leveling.
Student provides a
partially clear, logical
definition of resource
leveling.
Student provides a weak,
unclear, or incomplete
definition of resource
leveling.
15 points 10 points 8 points 6 points
Student provides a clear,
logical discussion of the
internal post project
evaluation process and the
two types of meetings
involved.
Student provides a mostly
clear, logical discussion of
the internal post project
evaluation process and
the two types of meetings
involved.
Student provides a
partially clear, logical
discussion of the internal
post project evaluation
process and the two types
of meetings involved.
Student provides a weak,
unclear, or incomplete
discussion of the internal
post project evaluation
process and the two
types of meetings
involved.
15 points 10 points 8 points 6 points
Student provides a clear,
logical discussion of some
ways you can obtain
feedback from a customer
after a project has been
completed and how you
would use this information.
Student provides a mostly
clear, logical discussion of
some ways you can obtain
feedback from a customer
after a project has been
completed and how you
would use this
information.
Student provides a
partially clear, logical
discussion of some ways
you can obtain feedback
from a customer after a
project has been
completed and how you
would use this
information.
Student provides a weak,
unclear, or incomplete
discussion of some ways
you can obtain feedback
from a customer after a
project has been
completed and how you
would use this
information.
2 points 1.5 points 1 point.5 point
Student makes no errors in
grammar or spelling that
distract the reader from the
content.
Student makes 1-2 errors
in grammar or spelling
that distract the reader
from the content.
Student makes 3-4 errors
in grammar or spelling that
distract the reader from
the content.
Student makes more
than 4 errors in grammar
or spelling that distract
the reader from the
content.
3 points 2 points 1 point.5 point
The paper is written in
proper format. All sources
used for quotes and facts
are credible and cited
correctly. Excellent
organization, including a
variety of thoughtful
transitions.
The paper is written in
proper format with only 1-
2 errors. All sources used
for quotes and facts are
credible and most are
cited correctly. Adequate
organization includes a
variety of appropriate
transitions.
The paper is written in
proper format with only 3-
5 errors. Most sources
used for quotes and facts
are credible and cited
correctly. Essay is poorly
organized, but may
include a few effective
transitions.
The paper is not written
in proper format. Many
sources used for quotes
and facts are less than
credible (suspect) and/or
are not cited correctly.
Essay is disorganized and
does not include
effective transitions.
Mechanics -Grammar,
Punctuation, Spelling
(2 Points)
Format - APA Format,
Citations, Organization,
Transitions (3 Points)
Resource Leveling (15 Points)
Feedback (15 Points)
Post Project Evaluation
Process (15 Points)
Mike Airman
risk_mitigation_5-12.docx
0
