i have assignment of taxation law based on Australian law...
LAW5230 Assignment
Word Limit: Approximately 3 000 words (excluding calculations)
This assignment consists of three (3) case studies. You must complete all the case studies and all parts of each case study.
Case Study One
The Holly Family
Heath is a consulting engineer from Canada who has been offered an 18 month contract with an Australian construction company, Apartment World Pty Ltd. His wife, Hayley will accompany him to Australia for the whole 18 months and plans to find casual work as an accountant once she arrives. She will leave her business in Canada in the hands of her business partners for the time she is away and will receive no income from the business during her absence. Heath and Hayley have no children. The Holly’s envisage returning to their home in Montreal once Heath’s contract finishes. They rent out their home in Montreal for the period of their absence. Apartment World Pty Ltd will provide a furnished house for the Holly’s to live in for the duration of the contract. Heath and Holly also had a number of other relevant transactions during the year ended 30 June 2015:
Heath works at his usual job in Montreal until November 2014 and the couple travel to Australia on 1 December 2014. In Australia Heath earns salary of
$80,000 for his work with Apartment World Pty Ltd to 30 June 2015.
Hayley earns $23,000 during her time in Australia for accounting contract work she undertakes. In addition, Hayley was due to receive $3,000 in wages during the week ended 30 June 2015. Hayley directed the pay officer to instead pay the amount directly onto her credit card as it was over the limit. The amount was paid onto her credit card on 29 June 2015.
Heath and Hayley have a number of investments in companies listed on the Canadian Stock Exchange. They received dividends of $15,000AUD in October 2014 and $5,000AUD in March 2015. Once in Australia, they also acquire some Australian shares which earn them dividends of $3,000AUD in
2015. The dividends were declared by the Australian company on 15 June
2015 and Heath received the credit in his bank account on 10 July 2015.
Through Hayley’s accounting connections, Heath and Hayley purchased a parcel of land in QLD on 1 February 2015 for $200,000. They had good advice it would be the perfect location for a motel given substantial passing traffic travelling to mines in Western QLD. They spent some time and $8,000 gaining relevant development approvals and having plans drawn up. However, in May 2015 they were advised by the local council that the plans would only be approved on the condition that the motel was built at least 50m away from the highway. This condition would substantially reduce the number of units
able to be built and thus Heath and Hayley decided to abandon the project. They signed a contract to sell the land for $230,000 on 25 June 2015. The contract settled on 1 August 2015.
Hayley also purchased a commercial property located in Australia on her arrival. She has agreed with her current tenant that provided the rent does not increase during the period, the tenant will pay 2 years rent in advance to Hayley. Under the lease agreement, rent is non-refundable except at the discretion of the lessor. In accordance with this agreement, the tenant paid Hayley an amount of $104,000 on 28 March 2015, being two years rent in advance from 1 April 2015.
Required:
Provide advice to Heath and Hayley as to whether they would be considered
Case Study Two
Steve Smooth operates a management consulting business in downtown Brisbane as a sole practitioner. His clients are large businesses prepared to pay premium fees for Steve’s expert advice and ideas on all aspects of business. During the 2015 income year, Steve incurred the expenses listed below in the operation of his business.
Dining Expenses:
Steve regularly conducts business meetings with current and potential clients over
lunch or dinner and spent $40,000 on fine dining restaurant meals for himself and clients during the year. Steve’s records indicate that 30% of the total expenses incurred related to his own personal meals, 30% related to current clients and 40% related to potential clients. His expenses also included taxi fares for himself and his clients on these occasions. The taxi fares amounted to $12,500. Advise Steve whether he can claim a tax deduction for these expenses.
Legal Fees
About five years ago Steve purchased a licence to exclusively sell a particular human resource management software package in Brisbane as part of his consulting services. At the time he invested $15,000 in purchasing the licence which was for 6 years with an option to renew. Due to the popularity of the software, the developer wants to amend the terms of the contract to restrict Steve’s licence to a certain number of sales rather than exclusivity for a particular area. This would be in exchange for a lump sum payment. The sale of this software accounts for approximately 20% of Steve’s total revenue, but notwithstanding this, he is not keen to change the terms of his licence. He has
therefore incurred $14,000 in legal fees during the 2015 income year in
negotiating with the developer. As at 30 June 2015, the matter is still ongoing, but Steve is hopeful for an outcome in his favour.
Conference Attendance:
Steve travelled to a management conference in Las Vegas during the year. He
travelled with his wife Sally. Sally is a teacher and does not have any involvement in the business. While in the Las Vegas, Steve and Sally attended the four day conference and then boarded a tour which took them all over the East Coast of the United States. The tour was for 7 nights. Their expenses were as follows:
o Airfares $1,900 each
o Hotel – Las Vegas three nights $1,800
o Tour – all inclusive $8,000 each
o Meals during conference $1,000 each
o Return airport transfers $100 each trip (2 trips)
Maintenance
During the year, Steve repainted the entire interior of his business premises at a
cost of $11,000. The interior was last painted eight years ago and the old colour scheme did not match the new business branding and logo which was launched the previous year. Although the paintwork was generally in a fair condition, in several places and particularly in the reception area, the paintwork was peeling, scuffed and chipped.
Steve installed new blinds on all windows in the premises at a cost of $9,000.
Previously the windows were covered with curtains which were approximately eight years old.
Letter of Advice:
Provide advice to Steve as to the deductibility (or not) of each of the above
transactions for the 2015 income tax year in the form of a Client Letter of Advice. Your letter of advice should be written in language suitable for the audience and highlight Steve’s likely ability of claiming tax deductions along with any requests for further information you would need to come to a conclusion. You should also submit a brief summary of the law/legal principles you have used to write your letter as a separate page. This is where you would make reference to all relevant legislation, case law principles and rulings in approaching this question. Please consult the marking criteria for further information.
Case Study Three
Devi is a resident of Australia for tax purposes and has informed you of the following transactions which occurred during the income year ended 30 June 2015. Devi also informs you that he has unused carried forward capital losses from the 2012 year of
$3,000. This loss relates to the sale of land. Additionally he has an $800 carried forward capital loss from the 2014 income year in relation to the sale of painting.
Shares
Devi’s father passed away in October 2014 leaving him a parcel of 30,000 shares in a
listed company that he acquired over his lifetime. Devi’s father had acquired the shares in the following way:
|
Date |
Number of Shares |
Cost/share |
Brokerage |
|
April 1985 |
10,000 |
$4.60 |
$180 |
|
September 1998 |
5,000 |
$6.20 |
$270 |
|
August 2014 |
15,000 |
$8.00 |
$310 |
In February 2015, Devi sold all of the shares at $11.00 per share. He incurred brokerage fees of 2% of the proceeds at the time of sale. At the time of his father’s death in October 2014, the shares had a market value of $7.50
House
Devi purchased a rental property on 1 August 1992 for $240,000 and incurred stamp
duty and legal expenses of $6,200 in total at the date of purchase. He rented the property out to tenants up until 1 July 2000 when he decided to move into the property himself and commenced using it as his main residence. He paid $63,000 to put a covered outdoor entertaining area onto the rear of the house on 1 July 2006. He entered into a contract to sell the property on 1 June 2015 for $510,000 with settlement to take place on 18 July 2015. The house was used as a main residence by Devi between 1 July 2006 and 1 June 2015 when the property was sold. Interest paid on the property amounted to $6,000 during the period when the property was rented to tenants and $11,000 during the period it was a main residence.
Caravan
Devi sold his caravan (mobile home) for $290,000 on 9 February 2015. Devi had
purchased it on 9 February 2010 for $350,000. Devi used the caravan primarily for family holidays.
Required:
Advise Devi as to the capital gain/loss incurred for each of the above separate
transactions. Additionally, advise Devi of his net capital gain included in assessable income for the income year ended 30 June 2015 (if any) based on your conclusions. Assume that Devi wishes to minimise his gain wherever possible. Perform calculations of any relevant capital gains and support all conclusions with legislation and/or cases.
|
LAW5230 – Taxation Law Semester 1, 2015 Assignment Marking Criteria Sheet |
||||||
|
Case Study 1 – Assessable Income Issues |
Little attempt |
F |
C |
B |
A |
HD |
|
Identification of legal issues, legislation and case law |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Overall the student has identified the relevant assessable income issues, legislation and where appropriate case law and rulings. |
0 |
0.5 |
1.5 |
2 |
2.5 |
3 |
|
Application |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Demonstrated level of understanding of the residency & source issues through the application of the identified law. |
1 |
2 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
9 |
|
Demonstrated level of understanding of the derivation/timing issues through the application of the identified law. |
1 |
2 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
9 |
|
Demonstrated level of understanding of the ordinary income issues through the application of the identified law. |
1 |
2 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
9 |
|
Conclusions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Overall, the student has drawn appropriate and valid conclusions after applying the law. |
0 |
0.5 |
1.5 |
2 |
2.5 |
3 |
|
Total out of 33 |
|
|
Case Study 2 – Letter of Advice |
Little attempt |
F |
C |
B |
A |
HD |
|
Identification of legal issues, legislation and case law |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The student has identified the significant relevant client issues, legislation and case law. |
0 |
1 |
1.5 |
2 |
2.5 |
3 |
|
Application |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Demonstrated level of understanding the relevant issues, legal concepts in both letter and supporting information. (Dining and Legal Fees) |
0 |
1 |
2.5 |
3.5 |
4 |
5 |
|
Demonstrated level of understanding the relevant issues, legal concepts in both letter and supporting information.(Conference) |
0 |
1 |
2.5 |
3.5 |
4 |
5 |
|
Demonstrated level of understanding the relevant issues, legal concepts in both letter and supporting information. (Maintenance) |
0 |
1 |
2.5 |
3.5 |
4 |
5 |
|
Conclusions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The student has identified appropriate further information required. |
0 |
1 |
1.5 |
2 |
2.5 |
3 |
|
The student has drawn appropriate and valid conclusions and recommendations for the client. |
0 |
1 |
3 |
4 |
4.5 |
6 |
|
Expression. |
|
|||||
|
Overall clarity of expression, use of grammar and appropriateness of the language and terminology for a client letter of advice. |
0 1 3 4 4.5 6 |
|||||
|
Total out of 33 |
|
|
Case Study 3 – Capital Gains Tax Issues |
Little attempt |
F |
C |
B |
A |
HD |
|
Identification of legal issues, legislation and case law |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Overall the student has identified the relevant capital gains tax issues, legislation and where appropriate case law and rulings. |
0 |
0.5 |
1.5 |
2 |
2.5 |
3 |
|
Application |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Demonstrated level of understanding of the specific capital gains tax issues in relation to the sale of Devi’s shares. |
1 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
|
Demonstrated level of understanding of the specific capital gains tax issues in relation to the sale of Devi’s house. |
1 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
|
Demonstrated level of understanding of the specific capital gains tax issues in relation to the sale of Devi’s caravan. |
0 |
1 |
2 |
2.5 |
3.5 |
4 |
|
Conclusions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Overall, the student has drawn appropriate and valid conclusions after applying the law. (Calculation & explanation of Net Capital Gain) |
0 |
0.5 |
1.5 |
2 |
2.5 |
3 |
|
Total out of 24 |
|
|
General Criteria |
Little attempt |
F |
C |
B |
A |
HD |
|
Overall clarity of expression, logical flow of ideas, use of grammar and punctuation. |
1 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
|
Ability to use chosen referencing method appropriately and correctly. |
0 |
1 |
1.5 |
2 |
2.5 |
3 |
|
Total out of 10 |
|
TOTAL (out of 100)
Description of Performance Standards;
HD – the student has shown a very high level of demonstrated ability in relation to the stated criteria by covering
all valid points in a clear and succinct manner. The student may have also demonstrated an ability to think beyond the facts and recognise the broader implications of the facts, missing facts or alternate arguments.
A – The student has show a high level of demonstrated ability in relation to the stated criteria by either covering all valid points or by covering the majority of valid points in a clear and succinct manner. The student may have very briefly or occasionally shown ability at the HD level.
B - The student has show a good level of demonstrated ability in relation to the stated criteria by covering most of the valid points. The student may have made some minor incorrect statements or missed some minor points.
C - The student has show a satisfactory level of demonstrated ability in relation to the stated criteria by covering the main valid points. The student may have made a number of minor incorrect statements but did make incorrect statements in relation to major points.
F - The student has not shown a satisfactory level of demonstrated ability in relation to the stated criteria by missing some main points or by making incorrect statements in relation to major points.
Little Attempt – The student has not addressed or attempted to address this criterion.
END OF ASSIGNMENT