revion

There is freedom of worship at free will, and a member is entitled to move to one religion to the other at free will, and one should not be discriminated. The university also treated with contempt the Newman Center by denying them the right to worship within their premises. By arguing that the statement were a variance with established Catholic Doctrine and therefore they were not allowed to hold religious activities within their premises is a clear constitution violation on the basis of different opinion and the University is answerable for such malicious acts.

Church and state are separate organization and, therefore, the state should not act on the decisions made by the church regarding a given entity. The university taking action against the statement made by a student at the Newman center is not within the constitutional coverage, and therefore it is termed as being unconstitutional. What is punishable by the state does not imply that is should be punishable by the church as they are separate entities that are guided by their constitution and rules. It is illegal also to punish an organization or a group for the statement that was made by an individual and, therefore, the constitutional right of the Newman Center was violated.