PUJA

profileh6000
chapter_5_hitt.pptx

PART 2: STRATEGIC ACTIONS:

STRATEGY FORMULATION

CHAPTER 5 COMPETITIVE RIVALRY AND COMPETITIVE DYNAMICS

Authored by:

Marta Szabo White, PhD.

Georgia State University

THE STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT PROCESS

©2013 Cengage Learning.  All Rights Reserved.  May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.

KNOWLEDGE OBJECTIVES

©2013 Cengage Learning.  All Rights Reserved.  May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.

● Define competitors, competitive rivalry, competitive behavior, and competitive dynamics.

● Describe market commonality and resource similarity as the building blocks of a competitor analysis.

● Explain awareness, motivation, and ability as drivers of competitive behaviors.

KNOWLEDGE OBJECTIVES

©2013 Cengage Learning.  All Rights Reserved.  May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.

● Discuss factors affecting the likelihood a competitor will take competitive actions.

● Describe factors affecting the likelihood a competitor will respond to actions taken against it.

● Explain the competitive dynamics in each of slow-cycle, fast-cycle, and standard-cycle markets.

COMPETITORS

COMPETITORS:

firms operating in the same market, offering similar products, and targeting similar customers

EXAMPLES:

■ Southwest, Delta, United, Continental, and JetBlue

■ PepsiCo and Coca-Cola Company

■ Apple’s family of products (Macs, iPads, iPods, and iPhones) compete in the video game market with standalone and mobile game platforms from Sony, Microsoft, and Nintendo

IMPORTANT DEFINITIONS

©2013 Cengage Learning.  All Rights Reserved.  May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.

COMPETITIVE DYNAMICS VERSUS RIVALRY

©2013 Cengage Learning.  All Rights Reserved.  May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.

COMPETITIVE DYNAMICS

COMPETITIVE RIVALRY

Ongoing actions and responses taking place between an individual firm and its competitors for advantageous market position

Ongoing actions and responses taking place among all firms competing within a market for advantageous positions

A MODEL OF COMPETITIVE RIVALRY

Firms are mutually interdependent

A firm’s competitive actions have noticeable effects on competitors

A firm’s competitive actions elicit competitive responses from competitors

Firms are affected by each other’s actions and responses

Over time firms take competitive actions and reactions

©2013 Cengage Learning.  All Rights Reserved.  May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.

A MODEL OF COMPETITIVE RIVALRY

FIGURE 5.2

A Model of Competitive Rivalry

©2013 Cengage Learning.  All Rights Reserved.  May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.

COMPETITOR ANALYSIS

Two components to assess:

MARKET COMMONALITY and RESOURCE SIMILARITY

The question: To what extent are firms competitors?

● Competitor: high market commonality & high resource similarity

EXAMPLE: Dell and HP are direct competitors

● Combination of market commonality & resource similarity indicate a firm’s direct competitors

DIRECT COMPETITION DOES NOT ALWAYS IMPLY INTENSE RIVALRY

MARKET COMMONALITY AND RESOURCE SIMILARITY

©2013 Cengage Learning.  All Rights Reserved.  May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.

A FRAMEWORK OF COMPETITOR ANALYSIS

FIGURE 5.3

A Framework of Competitor Analysis

©2013 Cengage Learning.  All Rights Reserved.  May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.

COMPETITIVE RIVALRY

The ongoing competitive action/response sequence between a firm and a competitor affects the performance of both firms.

Understanding a competitor’s awareness, motivation, and ability helps the firm predict the likelihood of an attack and response to actions initiated by the firm or other competitors.

The predictions drawn from studying competitors in terms of awareness, motivation, and ability are grounded in market commonality and resource similarity.

©2013 Cengage Learning.  All Rights Reserved.  May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.

COMPETITIVE RIVALRY

STRATEGIC AND TACTICAL ACTIONS

Strategic Action (or Response)

A market-based move that involves a significant commitment of organizational resources and is difficult to implement and reverse

Tactical Action (or Response)

A market-based move that is taken to fine-tune a strategy

Usually involves fewer resources

Is relatively easy to implement and reverse

©2013 Cengage Learning.  All Rights Reserved.  May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.

LIKELIHOOD OF ATTACK

In addition to:

● Market commonality

● Resource similarity

● Awareness

● Motivation

● Ability

Other factors also affect the likelihood that a competitor will use strategic and tactical actions to attack its competitors:

● First-mover incentives

● Organizational size

● Quality

©2013 Cengage Learning.  All Rights Reserved.  May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.

LIKELIHOOD OF ATTACK

First-Mover Incentives

First Mover A firm that takes an initial competitive action in order to build or defend its competitive advantages or to improve its market position

First movers allocate funds for:

Product innovation and development

Aggressive advertising

Advanced research and development

First movers can gain:

The loyalty of customers who may become committed to the firm’s goods or services

Market share that can be difficult for competitors to take during future competitive rivalry

©2013 Cengage Learning.  All Rights Reserved.  May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.

LIKELIHOOD OF ATTACK

First-Mover Incentives

Second Mover

Second mover responds to first mover, typically through imitation

Is more cautious than first movers

Tends to study customer reactions to product innovations

Tends to learn from the mistakes of first movers, reducing its risks

Takes advantage of time to develop processes and technologies that are more efficient than first movers, reducing its costs

Can avoid both the mistakes and the huge spending of the first movers

Will not benefit from first mover advantages, lowering potential returns

©2013 Cengage Learning.  All Rights Reserved.  May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.

LIKELIHOOD OF ATTACK

First-Mover Incentives

Second Mover

Late Mover

Late mover responds to a competitive action only after considerable time has elapsed since first and second movers have taken action

Any success achieved will be slow in coming and much less than that achieved by first and second movers

Late mover’s competitive action allows it to earn only average returns and delays its understanding of how to create value for customers

Has substantially reduced risks and returns

©2013 Cengage Learning.  All Rights Reserved.  May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.

LIKELIHOOD OF ATTACK

First-Mover Incentives

Second Mover

Late Mover

Organizational Size - Small

Small firms are more likely:

To launch competitive actions

To be quicker

To be nimble and flexible competitors

To rely on speed and surprise to defend their competitive advantage

To have flexibility needed to launch a greater variety of competitive actions

©2013 Cengage Learning.  All Rights Reserved.  May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.

LIKELIHOOD OF ATTACK

First-Mover Incentives

Second Mover

Late Mover

Organizational Size - Large

Large firms are more likely to initiate competitive as well as strategic actions over time

Large organizations often have greater slack resources

They tend to rely on a limited variety of competitive actions, which can ultimately reduce their competitive success

Think and act big and we’ll get smaller. Think and act small and we’ll get bigger. Herb Kelleher Former CEO, Southwest Airlines

Walmart has the flexibility required to take many types of competitive actions that few—if any—of its competitors can undertake, and does it at a reduced cost

©2013 Cengage Learning.  All Rights Reserved.  May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.

LIKELIHOOD OF ATTACK

First-Mover Incentives

Second Mover

Late Mover

Organizational Size

Quality (Product)

Quality exists when the firm’s goods or services meet or exceed customers’ expectations

Product quality dimensions include:

Performance

Features

Flexibility

Durability

Conformance

Serviceability

Aesthetics

Perceived quality

©2013 Cengage Learning.  All Rights Reserved.  May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.

LIKELIHOOD OF ATTACK

First-Mover Incentives

Second Mover

Late Mover

Organizational Size

Quality (Service)

Service quality dimensions include:

Timeliness

Courtesy

Consistency

Convenience

Completeness

Accuracy

©2013 Cengage Learning.  All Rights Reserved.  May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.

COMPETITIVE DYNAMICS

Slow-Cycle Markets

Competitive advantages are shielded from imitation for long periods of time and imitation is costly.

Competitive advantages are sustainable in slow-cycle markets.

Build a unique and proprietary capability that yields competitive advantage, creating sustainability (i.e., proprietary and difficult for competitors to imitate).

Once a proprietary advantage is developed, competitive behavior should be oriented to protecting, maintaining, and extending that advantage.

Organizational structure should be used to effectively support strategic efforts.

©2013 Cengage Learning.  All Rights Reserved.  May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.

COMPETITIVE DYNAMICS

Slow-Cycle Markets

Fast-Cycle Markets

The firm’s competitive advantages are not shielded from imitation.

Technology is non-proprietary.

Imitation is rapid and inexpensive.

Competitive advantages are not sustainable.

Reverse engineering.

Market volatility.

Focus: Learning how to rapidly and continuously develop new competitive advantages that are superior to those they replace (creating innovation).

©2013 Cengage Learning.  All Rights Reserved.  May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.

COMPETITIVE DYNAMICS

Slow-Cycle Markets

Fast-Cycle Markets

Avoid loyalty to any one product, possibly cannibalizing on own current products to launch new ones before competitors learn how to do so through successful imitation.

Continually try to move on to another temporary competitive advantage before competitors can respond to the previous one.

©2013 Cengage Learning.  All Rights Reserved.  May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.

COMPETITIVE DYNAMICS

Slow-Cycle Markets

Fast-Cycle Markets

Standard-Cycle Markets

Firm’s competitive advantages are moderately shielded from imitation

Imitation is moderately costly

Competitive advantages partially sustainable if quality is continuously upgraded

Firms

Seek large market shares; mass markets

Develop economies of scale

Gain customer loyalty through brand names

Carefully control operations

Manage a consistent experience for the customer

©2013 Cengage Learning.  All Rights Reserved.  May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.

COMPETITIVE DYNAMICS

Slow-Cycle Markets

Fast-Cycle Markets

Standard-Cycle Markets

IMITATION

COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE

Slow and Costly Proprietary rights A costly-to-imitate resource/capability usually results from unique historical conditions, causal ambiguity, and/or social complexity Sustained competitive advantage is most achievable in this market
Rapid and Inexpensive Not sustainable Reverse engineering
Faster and less costly than in slow-cycle markets; and slower and more expensive than in fast-cycle markets Partially sustainable

©2013 Cengage Learning.  All Rights Reserved.  May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.