PUJA
PART 2: STRATEGIC ACTIONS:
STRATEGY FORMULATION
CHAPTER 5 COMPETITIVE RIVALRY AND COMPETITIVE DYNAMICS
Authored by:
Marta Szabo White, PhD.
Georgia State University
THE STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT PROCESS
©2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.
KNOWLEDGE OBJECTIVES
©2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.
● Define competitors, competitive rivalry, competitive behavior, and competitive dynamics.
● Describe market commonality and resource similarity as the building blocks of a competitor analysis.
● Explain awareness, motivation, and ability as drivers of competitive behaviors.
KNOWLEDGE OBJECTIVES
©2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.
● Discuss factors affecting the likelihood a competitor will take competitive actions.
● Describe factors affecting the likelihood a competitor will respond to actions taken against it.
● Explain the competitive dynamics in each of slow-cycle, fast-cycle, and standard-cycle markets.
COMPETITORS
COMPETITORS:
firms operating in the same market, offering similar products, and targeting similar customers
EXAMPLES:
■ Southwest, Delta, United, Continental, and JetBlue
■ PepsiCo and Coca-Cola Company
■ Apple’s family of products (Macs, iPads, iPods, and iPhones) compete in the video game market with standalone and mobile game platforms from Sony, Microsoft, and Nintendo
IMPORTANT DEFINITIONS
©2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.
COMPETITIVE DYNAMICS VERSUS RIVALRY
©2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.
COMPETITIVE DYNAMICS
COMPETITIVE RIVALRY
Ongoing actions and responses taking place between an individual firm and its competitors for advantageous market position
Ongoing actions and responses taking place among all firms competing within a market for advantageous positions
A MODEL OF COMPETITIVE RIVALRY
Firms are mutually interdependent
A firm’s competitive actions have noticeable effects on competitors
A firm’s competitive actions elicit competitive responses from competitors
Firms are affected by each other’s actions and responses
Over time firms take competitive actions and reactions
©2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.
A MODEL OF COMPETITIVE RIVALRY
FIGURE 5.2
A Model of Competitive Rivalry
©2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.
COMPETITOR ANALYSIS
Two components to assess:
MARKET COMMONALITY and RESOURCE SIMILARITY
The question: To what extent are firms competitors?
● Competitor: high market commonality & high resource similarity
EXAMPLE: Dell and HP are direct competitors
● Combination of market commonality & resource similarity indicate a firm’s direct competitors
DIRECT COMPETITION DOES NOT ALWAYS IMPLY INTENSE RIVALRY
MARKET COMMONALITY AND RESOURCE SIMILARITY
©2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.
A FRAMEWORK OF COMPETITOR ANALYSIS
FIGURE 5.3
A Framework of Competitor Analysis
©2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.
COMPETITIVE RIVALRY
The ongoing competitive action/response sequence between a firm and a competitor affects the performance of both firms.
Understanding a competitor’s awareness, motivation, and ability helps the firm predict the likelihood of an attack and response to actions initiated by the firm or other competitors.
The predictions drawn from studying competitors in terms of awareness, motivation, and ability are grounded in market commonality and resource similarity.
©2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.
COMPETITIVE RIVALRY
STRATEGIC AND TACTICAL ACTIONS
Strategic Action (or Response)
A market-based move that involves a significant commitment of organizational resources and is difficult to implement and reverse
Tactical Action (or Response)
A market-based move that is taken to fine-tune a strategy
Usually involves fewer resources
Is relatively easy to implement and reverse
©2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.
LIKELIHOOD OF ATTACK
In addition to:
● Market commonality
● Resource similarity
● Awareness
● Motivation
● Ability
Other factors also affect the likelihood that a competitor will use strategic and tactical actions to attack its competitors:
● First-mover incentives
● Organizational size
● Quality
©2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.
LIKELIHOOD OF ATTACK
First-Mover Incentives
First Mover A firm that takes an initial competitive action in order to build or defend its competitive advantages or to improve its market position
First movers allocate funds for:
Product innovation and development
Aggressive advertising
Advanced research and development
First movers can gain:
The loyalty of customers who may become committed to the firm’s goods or services
Market share that can be difficult for competitors to take during future competitive rivalry
©2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.
LIKELIHOOD OF ATTACK
First-Mover Incentives
Second Mover
Second mover responds to first mover, typically through imitation
Is more cautious than first movers
Tends to study customer reactions to product innovations
Tends to learn from the mistakes of first movers, reducing its risks
Takes advantage of time to develop processes and technologies that are more efficient than first movers, reducing its costs
Can avoid both the mistakes and the huge spending of the first movers
Will not benefit from first mover advantages, lowering potential returns
©2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.
LIKELIHOOD OF ATTACK
First-Mover Incentives
Second Mover
Late Mover
Late mover responds to a competitive action only after considerable time has elapsed since first and second movers have taken action
Any success achieved will be slow in coming and much less than that achieved by first and second movers
Late mover’s competitive action allows it to earn only average returns and delays its understanding of how to create value for customers
Has substantially reduced risks and returns
©2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.
LIKELIHOOD OF ATTACK
First-Mover Incentives
Second Mover
Late Mover
Organizational Size - Small
Small firms are more likely:
To launch competitive actions
To be quicker
To be nimble and flexible competitors
To rely on speed and surprise to defend their competitive advantage
To have flexibility needed to launch a greater variety of competitive actions
©2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.
LIKELIHOOD OF ATTACK
First-Mover Incentives
Second Mover
Late Mover
Organizational Size - Large
Large firms are more likely to initiate competitive as well as strategic actions over time
Large organizations often have greater slack resources
They tend to rely on a limited variety of competitive actions, which can ultimately reduce their competitive success
Think and act big and we’ll get smaller. Think and act small and we’ll get bigger. Herb Kelleher Former CEO, Southwest Airlines
Walmart has the flexibility required to take many types of competitive actions that few—if any—of its competitors can undertake, and does it at a reduced cost
©2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.
LIKELIHOOD OF ATTACK
First-Mover Incentives
Second Mover
Late Mover
Organizational Size
Quality (Product)
Quality exists when the firm’s goods or services meet or exceed customers’ expectations
Product quality dimensions include:
Performance
Features
Flexibility
Durability
Conformance
Serviceability
Aesthetics
Perceived quality
©2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.
LIKELIHOOD OF ATTACK
First-Mover Incentives
Second Mover
Late Mover
Organizational Size
Quality (Service)
Service quality dimensions include:
Timeliness
Courtesy
Consistency
Convenience
Completeness
Accuracy
©2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.
COMPETITIVE DYNAMICS
Slow-Cycle Markets
Competitive advantages are shielded from imitation for long periods of time and imitation is costly.
Competitive advantages are sustainable in slow-cycle markets.
Build a unique and proprietary capability that yields competitive advantage, creating sustainability (i.e., proprietary and difficult for competitors to imitate).
Once a proprietary advantage is developed, competitive behavior should be oriented to protecting, maintaining, and extending that advantage.
Organizational structure should be used to effectively support strategic efforts.
©2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.
COMPETITIVE DYNAMICS
Slow-Cycle Markets
Fast-Cycle Markets
The firm’s competitive advantages are not shielded from imitation.
Technology is non-proprietary.
Imitation is rapid and inexpensive.
Competitive advantages are not sustainable.
Reverse engineering.
Market volatility.
Focus: Learning how to rapidly and continuously develop new competitive advantages that are superior to those they replace (creating innovation).
©2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.
COMPETITIVE DYNAMICS
Slow-Cycle Markets
Fast-Cycle Markets
Avoid loyalty to any one product, possibly cannibalizing on own current products to launch new ones before competitors learn how to do so through successful imitation.
Continually try to move on to another temporary competitive advantage before competitors can respond to the previous one.
©2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.
COMPETITIVE DYNAMICS
Slow-Cycle Markets
Fast-Cycle Markets
Standard-Cycle Markets
Firm’s competitive advantages are moderately shielded from imitation
Imitation is moderately costly
Competitive advantages partially sustainable if quality is continuously upgraded
Firms
Seek large market shares; mass markets
Develop economies of scale
Gain customer loyalty through brand names
Carefully control operations
Manage a consistent experience for the customer
©2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.
COMPETITIVE DYNAMICS
Slow-Cycle Markets
Fast-Cycle Markets
Standard-Cycle Markets
IMITATION
COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE
| Slow and Costly Proprietary rights A costly-to-imitate resource/capability usually results from unique historical conditions, causal ambiguity, and/or social complexity | Sustained competitive advantage is most achievable in this market |
| Rapid and Inexpensive | Not sustainable Reverse engineering |
| Faster and less costly than in slow-cycle markets; and slower and more expensive than in fast-cycle markets | Partially sustainable |
©2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.